On 8/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Even though ClamAV has been configured, I still receive the same error in
> regard to it saying "... connecting to clamd service ...". It just sits
> there forever and no progress is shown. I actually let it sit for an hour
> to
Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 05:16:38PM -0400, Marshall Dudley said:
>> /tmp/clamav-ec6d3e4e4e253eaf directory and filled it up. To make
>> matters worse, I had a difficult time deleting them to get the system
>> back up because when I tried to do a "rm *" it reported that the f
Hi List,
I am testing out clamav on a qmail/vpopmail/simscan setup. Seems like the virus
is accepted. See below.
@400046c12173114f2124 simscan:[23879]:CLEAN (3.00/5.00):6.7643s:Emailing_
message.txt.exe:165.21.103.142:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@400046c1217315e49764 tcpserver:
Hello,
Even though ClamAV has been configured, I still receive the same error in
regard to it saying "... connecting to clamd service ...". It just sits
there forever and no progress is shown. I actually let it sit for an hour
to see if it was taking a long time to load yet it obviously has someth
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Sargent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 8:22 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: [Clamav-users] clamd service
> Importance: Low
>
> I have installed clamav thus:-
>
> yum install clamav
>
> But it did not install a clamd servi
On Monday 13 August 2007 11:26 am, Stephen Gran wrote:
>...
> How many unix admins does it take to not notice that rm has a recursive
> option?
That is fine, if you want to remove the directory, not just the contents of
it. You could remove the directory and then re-create it though.
If you want
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 05:16:38PM -0400, Marshall Dudley said:
> /tmp/clamav-ec6d3e4e4e253eaf directory and filled it up. To make
> matters worse, I had a difficult time deleting them to get the system
> back up because when I tried to do a "rm *" it reported that the file
> list was too long,
Am 13.08.2007 um 18:24 schrieb Roberto Ullfig:
> What determines a clean/small/fast database? Are these removals logged
> anywhere? I now notice that all Phishing "viruses" are gone and we're
> now getting Email.Ecard viruses. Was there a renaming?
The RB signatures are not generic and will usua
Sven Strickroth wrote:
> Am 10.08.2007 19:00 schrieb Roberto Ullfig:
>
>> On 2007-08-10 12:42, Roberto Ullfig wrote:
>> Actually, what we see is that nearly all viruses of the form:
>>
>> Email.Phishing.RB-12...
>>
>> stopped being detected on Aug 9 15:31 on all 12 of our servers. On one
>> ser
I have installed clamav thus:-
yum install clamav
But it did not install a clamd service:-
chkconfig clamd --list
error reading information on service clamd: No such file or directory
Have I done something wrong?
--
Steve Sargent, Vox +44 020 7882 3220, Fax +44 020 8980 2001
QMUL Computing S
Ken Sandberg wrote:
> Try "ls | xargs rm" to get around the list being too long.
The safe way to do this, assuming GNU find and GNU xargs, is:
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 rm
Regards,
David.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guid
On Friday 10 August 2007 02:16 pm, Marshall Dudley wrote:
>...
>To make
> matters worse, I had a difficult time deleting them to get the system
> back up because when I tried to do a "rm *" it reported that the file
> list was too long, so I had to delete them a few at a time.
Try "ls | xargs rm"
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Marshall Dudley wrote:
>
>> I was running clamscan, and the var partition of the drive filled up.
>> This partition had 300 Meg free on it, and clamscan created a huge
>> number of files like mixedtextportion05GJ4k in the
>> /tmp/clamav-ec6d3e4e4e253eaf directory and
Christoph Cordes wrote:
> Am 10.08.2007 um 23:16 schrieb Marshall Dudley:
>
>
>> I was running clamscan, and the var partition of the drive filled up.
>> This partition had 300 Meg free on it, and clamscan created a huge
>> number of files like mixedtextportion05GJ4k in the
>> /tmp/clamav-ec6d3e
Dear all
I am an absolute newbie with postfix, amavis and clamav. I had set up an
installation on Fedora7 with postfix 2.4.2 , amavis-new and clamav.
Without content and virus filtering everything worked fine, but when i
tried to filter virus affected emails i ran into the following error
m
Make sure that LocalSocket in clamd.conf points to the same socket as in
amavisd.conf
For example my clamd.conf says "LocalSocket /tmp/clamd" and in amavisd.conf
under @av_scanners = (
['ClamAV-clamd',
\&ask_daemon, ["CONTSCAN {}\n", "/tmp/clamd"],
qr/\bOK$/, qr/\bFOUND$/,
qr/^.*?: (?!
Hi there,
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Re: memory leak in clamd (0.91.1)?
> Does clamd (0.91.1) have a memory leak of some sort?
I use sendmail and clamav-milter, and I see something rather strange
with 0.91.1. I haven't usesd versions between those, I moved from
0.88.7 direct
Dear all
I am an absolute newbie with postfix, amavis and clamav. I had set up an
installation on Fedora7 with postfix 2.4.2 , amavis-new and clamav.
Without content and virus filtering everything worked fine, but when i
tried to filter virus affected emails i ran into the following error
mess
Le Mon 13/08/2007, Tomasz Chmielewski disait
> Does clamd (0.91.1) have a memory leak of some sort?
>
> After it's started, it takes just about 40-50 MB:
>
> clamav 13602 48.0 8.4 47932 45128 ?Ds 10:38 0:01 clamd
> -c /etc/clamd.conf
>
>
> After some time, the memory usage goes
Does clamd (0.91.1) have a memory leak of some sort?
After it's started, it takes just about 40-50 MB:
clamav 13602 48.0 8.4 47932 45128 ?Ds 10:38 0:01 clamd
-c /etc/clamd.conf
After some time, the memory usage goes to about 100 MB, machine begins
to swap more and more:
clama
20 matches
Mail list logo
