On 7/4/07, BG Mahesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I heard there is a flag --no-phishing-scan-urls and if I switch this off it
> will be fine.
> Is that the cause of my problem? If so, how do I specify in the conf file
> not to scan urls for phishing.
that option is for Phishing.Email.*, or Phishin
>
>
> >>Christoph
> >
> >
> >
> > Not including the From/To address etc. The body of the mail is as
> follows
> > and it has one attachments (.eml file) which is nothing but a previous
> email
> > which is being forwarded again to this user,
>
> Could you provide this attached/forwarded mail? P
I heard there is a flag --no-phishing-scan-urls and if I switch this off it
will be fine.
Is that the cause of my problem? If so, how do I specify in the conf file
not to scan urls for phishing.
I will submit the email on clamav site for FP. Will that email be made
public?
On 7/3/07, Christoph Co
I had version 0.90.1 running with no problems, then updated to 0.90.2. I had
a few problems getting it started but I did, and the logs were updating
daily with no problems. I had setup in both cases freshclam to be a root
cron job hourly. Last Thursday, June 28, 2007 I updated to 0.90.3 and
freshcl
On 7/3/07, Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/2/07, Török Edvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/3/07, Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've poked and prodded an rpm specfile to put all the directories and
> > files
> > > where system-config-selinux says it expects t
On 7/2/07, Török Edvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/3/07, Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've poked and prodded an rpm specfile to put all the directories and
> files
> > where system-config-selinux says it expects them to be... and it mostly
> > works without complaint.
> >
> >
BG Mahesh schrieb:
> On 7/3/07, Christoph Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> Could you please provide a copy of the mail that clam blocks? The
>> fact that i received your mail is a proof that ClamAV does not detect
>> anything in mails from you. So, the mail that Clam detects on your
>>
On 7/3/07, Christoph Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
>
> Could you please provide a copy of the mail that clam blocks? The
> fact that i received your mail is a proof that ClamAV does not detect
> anything in mails from you. So, the mail that Clam detects on your
> server contains s
Am 03.07.2007 um 07:30 schrieb BG Mahesh:
> On 6/28/07, Steve Basford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 554 Failure Messagecontains an infected attachment (
>> Email.Phishing.RB-827)
>>>
>>> The laptop that is sending the message is not infected with any
>>> virus.
>>
>> RB-827 is a phishin
