Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> I posted on another list as well, but thought this may gets more attention
> from the developers:
> Clamscan is extremely slow and CPU hungry. clamscan a pdf file of about 1.2
> MB
> and it takes about 1 minute. Same file with a commercial scanner takes 2 sec.
> This wasn
I posted on another list as well, but thought this may gets more attention
from the developers:
Clamscan is extremely slow and CPU hungry. clamscan a pdf file of about 1.2 MB
and it takes about 1 minute. Same file with a commercial scanner takes 2 sec.
This wasn't always like this. As a result, c
