> On Sunday 20 May 2007 17:16, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Thomas Spuhler wrote:
>> > Hello: I just joined the list and found this thread in the archive.
>> > It seems, I have a very similar problem. Clamscan is using up to 100%
>> cpu
>> > and memory lately and sometimes cannot even keep up with the
Good morning,
When I run a clamscan on a folder containing emails with different viruses.
There is an eicar that is not detected.
Would you know why?
The file start after this line:
t;1179497094
p;3
*;4
u;FILTER_DISCARD
c;tcp_intranet
(;TCP|129.194.9.224|25|129.194.16.24|46422
);SMTP/a
s;a ([129
On Sunday 20 May 2007 17:16, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> > Hello: I just joined the list and found this thread in the archive.
> > It seems, I have a very similar problem. Clamscan is using up to 100% cpu
> > and memory lately and sometimes cannot even keep up with the e-mail
>
Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> Hello: I just joined the list and found this thread in the archive.
> It seems, I have a very similar problem. Clamscan is using up to 100% cpu and
> memory lately and sometimes cannot even keep up with the e-mail flood.
> It happened twice in about a month. I deleted all s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thomas Spuhler wrote:
| Hello: I just joined the list and found this thread in the archive.
| It seems, I have a very similar problem. Clamscan is using up to 100% cpu and
| memory lately and sometimes cannot even keep up with the e-mail flood.
Con
Hello: I just joined the list and found this thread in the archive.
It seems, I have a very similar problem. Clamscan is using up to 100% cpu and
memory lately and sometimes cannot even keep up with the e-mail flood.
It happened twice in about a month. I deleted all signature files, did a
freshcl
