Re: [Clamav-users] new password protected .rar virus

2007-04-25 Thread Christoph Cordes
James Bourne schrieb: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Christoph Cordes wrote: > >> Gary V schrieb: >>> I received an email with a password protected .rar file that claims to >>> contain an .exe file that I should run in ordrer to protect me from an >>> undetected worm. I submitted it and it was recognized

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2 (solved)

2007-04-25 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:49:26 +0200 Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Rene, > > thx a bunch for sending the patch as attachment off the list. Works like > a charm, performance is well back. ;-) Seem it was indeed the patch just > got garbled on the list, as thought. > > Best r

Re: [Clamav-users] new password protected .rar virus

2007-04-25 Thread James Bourne
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Christoph Cordes wrote: > Gary V schrieb: >> I received an email with a password protected .rar file that claims to >> contain an .exe file that I should run in ordrer to protect me from an >> undetected worm. I submitted it and it was recognized as ... > The file inside the

Re: [Clamav-users] new password protected .rar virus

2007-04-25 Thread Christoph Cordes
Gary V schrieb: > I received an email with a password protected .rar file that claims to > contain an .exe file that I should run in ordrer to protect me from an > undetected worm. I submitted it and it was recognized as > Email.Phishing.RB-686. The only other anti virus vendor to recognize it > at

[Clamav-users] new password protected .rar virus

2007-04-25 Thread Gary V
I received an email with a password protected .rar file that claims to contain an .exe file that I should run in ordrer to protect me from an undetected worm. I submitted it and it was recognized as Email.Phishing.RB-686. The only other anti virus vendor to recognize it at this moment is McAfee

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays

2007-04-25 Thread Seth.Bush
Sorry...went to the web postings and realized the response was for a different issue, not related to mine. My apologies Seth Bush Information Systems Security Manager CAS, Inc. 5021 Technology Drive Huntsville, AL 35805 CAGE: 4S077 Ph: 256-895-8861 Fax: 256-895-8633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL P

[Clamav-users] Recall: Clamscan delays

2007-04-25 Thread Seth.Bush
Seth.Bush would like to recall the message, "[Clamav-users] Clamscan delays". ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays

2007-04-25 Thread Seth.Bush
I'm not sure how this addresses my problem stated below... "I am installing clamAV on IRIX 6.5. I have already read the postings in the archives regarding errors with gcc and cc during builds. Not my case. I found how to gunzip and "un"-tar the clamAV on IRIX to build from source. I ran the con

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays

2007-04-25 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:43 +0200 Urban Hillebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have > reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan - > however, on our mailgateways clamscan is still there as fallback if clam

[Clamav-users] clamAV and IRIX errors on install

2007-04-25 Thread Seth.Bush
I am installing clamAV on IRIX 6.5. I have already read the postings in the archives regarding errors with gcc and cc during builds. Not my case. I found how to gunzip and "un"-tar the clamAV on IRIX to build from source. I ran the configure script as shown in www.clamav.net/doc/latest/clamdo

[Clamav-users] TERROR_EM_VIRGINIA.scr

2007-04-25 Thread Kelly Jones
What's the best way to confirm that ClamAV is blocking a specific "in-the-news" virus? In this case, I want to make sure ClamAV is blocking the virus described at: http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2007/04/virginia.html It's pretty old (Sophos has been blocking it since January 2000

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays

2007-04-25 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:00:43AM +0200, Urban Hillebrand wrote: >With the newly introduced delays during the initialization of clamscan this >would cause us significant problems. So my question is: Will this get fixed, >or is this "working as expe