Matthias Häker wrote:
Bit Fuzzy schrieb:
I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing.
We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but
good things to say about it.
That is until we updated to version 90.1
Since the update any and all messages containing
Matthias Häker wrote:
Bit Fuzzy schrieb:
I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing.
We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but
good things to say about it.
That is until we updated to version 90.1
Since the update any and all messages containing
Bit Fuzzy schrieb:
I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing.
We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but
good things to say about it.
That is until we updated to version 90.1
Since the update any and all messages containing infected attachments
On Saturday March 31, 2007 at 12:25:49 (PM) Bit Fuzzy wrote:
> I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing.
>
> We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but
> good things to say about it.
> That is until we updated to version 90.1
>
> Since the update an
I'm hoping somebody can shed some light on what we're seeing.
We've been using ClamAV since version: 85.1 and have had nothing but
good things to say about it.
That is until we updated to version 90.1
Since the update any and all messages containing infected attachments
including the provided
