Re: [Clamav-users] Problem installing ClamAV 0.90.1 via NetBSD pkgsrc

2007-03-12 Thread Menuhin Saitov
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:30:30AM +0100, Menuhin Saitov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:10:46AM -0400, Frank DeChellis wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > In case there is a NetBSD user out there... > > > > We are using NetBSD 1.6.2 and I¹m having trouble installing clamAV 0.90.1 > > All has w

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem installing ClamAV 0.90.1 via NetBSD pkgsrc

2007-03-12 Thread Menuhin Saitov
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:10:46AM -0400, Frank DeChellis wrote: > > Hi there, > > In case there is a NetBSD user out there... > > We are using NetBSD 1.6.2 and I¹m having trouble installing clamAV 0.90.1 > All has worked fine until now. I have the latest pkg_install installed. > Running ³make

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update

2007-03-12 Thread Abdul Rehman Gani
On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:54 AM, Kevin W. Gagel wrote: Mark, I feel for you. I use the source to install and un-install. I assume this is the reason I'm not having the problems some others have described. I also use the source to install/re-install 0.90 and 0.90.1 on OpenBSD. Tried it on

[Clamav-users] Problem installing ClamAV 0.90.1 via NetBSD pkgsrc

2007-03-12 Thread Frank DeChellis
Hi there, In case there is a NetBSD user out there... We are using NetBSD 1.6.2 and I¹m having trouble installing clamAV 0.90.1 All has worked fine until now. I have the latest pkg_install installed. Running ³make update² it does it¹s thing then ends with [wrapper.sh] note: The real command li

Re: [Clamav-users] How to make ClamAV scan incoming email received by qmail on Plesk

2007-03-12 Thread John W. Baxter
On 3/11/07 11:02 PM, "Dennis Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I would never assume mail I receive has ever been scanned before, > but that's not what is implied in what I said, is it? If we both scan a > message one of us is redundant. I'm going to scan anyway, but hopefully > because yo

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update

2007-03-12 Thread Dennis Peterson
Mark wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin W. Gagel Sent: maandag 12 maart 2007 18:00 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update - Original Message - So, its been a few days. How is everyon

[Clamav-users] Compiling 0.90.1 on Mac OS X Server 10.3

2007-03-12 Thread Dana Kashubeck
I am not able to compile the latest stable version on Mac OS X Server 10.3. There are a few different warnings here and there, most of them are shown while compiling unrar.c: unrar/unrar.c: In function `cli_unrar_open': unrar/unrar.c:1468: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards qualifiers

Re: [Clamav-users] Don't know what to do with infected files

2007-03-12 Thread Pascal Duchatelle
Thomas Sprinkmeier a écrit : Is deleting it enough? My advice is to nuke infected systems. Even benign programs rarely uninstall cleanly; malware is nasty and designed not to go quietly. To nuke you mean just reformatting the space and to a re-install ? "oversized" archives are also known

RE: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update

2007-03-12 Thread Kevin W. Gagel
- Original Message - >In earnest, can't say as I'm very inspired to upgrade (from 0.88.7) yet. >Ranging from various serious pthread problems to excessive CPU usage, to >unlinking of pid files, to clamd dying, none of this makes me feel >inclined much to do the upgrade; 0.90 may well be the

[Clamav-users] Clamav Logs

2007-03-12 Thread clamav
Hello, I've come across a problem when the system archives the clamav logs each day. It sends a SIGHUP signal to the clamav-daemon and that restarts the logs for the clamav-daemon program but it stops recording the detailed log info about virus it stopped or other information that one might have

RE: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update

2007-03-12 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Kevin W. Gagel > Sent: maandag 12 maart 2007 18:00 > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update > > - Original Message - > > So, its been a few days. How is e

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi, Doug-- On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am experiencing the same problems. We have two quad CPU E450's running Solaris 9 handling the incomming mail on our domains. These servers are generally very busy. I initially installed clamav 0.90 with experimental code ena

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update

2007-03-12 Thread Kevin W. Gagel
- Original Message - >So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version? >I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating >problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades. > >What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enoug

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

2007-03-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am experiencing the same problems. We have two quad CPU E450's running Solaris 9 handling the incomming mail on our domains. These servers are generally very busy. I initially installed clamav 0.90 with experimental code enabled. Compiled in this way clamd would crash every 2 minutes without an

Re: [Clamav-users] Don't know what to do with infected files

2007-03-12 Thread Thomas Sprinkmeier
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 11:31 +0100, Pascal Duchatelle wrote: > Hi there, > > sorry to bother you but I am new to ClamAV (on fedora core 6). I ran > clamscan on my laptop and got a message telling me that I have 3 files > infected. > One is in my mail . I browed the FAQ and find a way supposed (by

[Clamav-users] Don't know what to do with infected files

2007-03-12 Thread Pascal Duchatelle
Hi there, sorry to bother you but I am new to ClamAV (on fedora core 6). I ran clamscan on my laptop and got a message telling me that I have 3 files infected. One is in my mail . I browed the FAQ and find a way supposed (by using the --debug option) to tell the number of the infected message