[Clamav-users] Re: 0.90rc3 from Sourceforge: How do I use the .sig file?

2007-02-02 Thread René Berber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roy Carin wrote: > Thanks René. This is what I get when I do that: > > $ gpg --keyserver random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de > --verify clamav-0.90rc3.tar.gz.sig > gpg: Signature made Wed Jan 31 18:04:35 2007 CST using DSA key ID 985A444B > gpg: Can't c

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: 0.90rc3 from Sourceforge: How do I use the .sig file?

2007-02-02 Thread Roy Carin
On 02/02/2007 04:11 PM, René Berber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roy Carin wrote: I just downloaded clamav 0.90rc3 from Sourceforge here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=86638&package_id=90197&release_id=483125 At first I though the .sig file was

[Clamav-users] clamav-0.90rc3 on FC6/x86_64

2007-02-02 Thread Bill Maidment
Hi Guys I've downloaded and compiled OK on an FC6/i386 machine, but cannot compile on FC6/x86_64 machines because it compains about /ust/lib/libidn.so being missing. Putting a link to /usr/lib/libidn.so.11.5.16 didn't work either. Finally, in desperation, I did ln -s /usr/lib64/libidn.so.11.5.16

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90rc3 on Sparc Solaris 9

2007-02-02 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote: > What breaks? I agree that at first glance it seems like an unnecessary > include, but I'm curious what error you get. Here are the errors I get building rc3 with --enable-experimental gcc 4.1.1 binutils 2.17 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I./u

[Clamav-users] Re: 0.90rc3 from Sourceforge: How do I use the .sig file?

2007-02-02 Thread René Berber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roy Carin wrote: > I just downloaded clamav 0.90rc3 from Sourceforge here: > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=86638&package_id=90197&release_id=483125 > > At first I though the .sig file was an md5-sum or sha1-sum, but it's > bin

[Clamav-users] 0.90rc3 from Sourceforge: How do I use the .sig file?

2007-02-02 Thread Roy Carin
I just downloaded clamav 0.90rc3 from Sourceforge here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=86638&package_id=90197&release_id=483125 At first I though the .sig file was an md5-sum or sha1-sum, but it's binary data. How do I use it to check the integrity of the tar file? --

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90rc3 on Sparc Solaris 9

2007-02-02 Thread Török Edvin
On 2/2/07, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:58:18PM +0100, Didi Rieder said: What breaks? I agree that at first glance it seems like an unnecessary include, but I'm curious what error you get. FYI this has already been fixed in CVS, thanks for the patch [its t

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90rc3 on Sparc Solaris 9

2007-02-02 Thread Stephen Gran
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:58:18PM +0100, Didi Rieder said: > Hi, > > the 0.90rc3 under Solaris needs the patch below if configured with > "--enable-experimental" > > --- hashtab.c.orig 2007-02-02 12:52:17.57604 +0100 > +++ hashtab.c 2007-02-02 12:52:34.702246000 +0100 > @@ -24,9 +24,

[Clamav-users] 0.90rc3 on Sparc Solaris 9

2007-02-02 Thread Didi Rieder
Hi, the 0.90rc3 under Solaris needs the patch below if configured with "--enable-experimental" --- hashtab.c.orig 2007-02-02 12:52:17.57604 +0100 +++ hashtab.c 2007-02-02 12:52:34.702246000 +0100 @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ #include #include -#include #include +#include "cltypes.h" #inc

[Clamav-users] FP on HTML.Phishing.Bank-573

2007-02-02 Thread Dhawal Doshy
Hello List, One of my users reported a missing mail, turned out that the attachment was detected as virus HTML.Phishing.Bank-573 This is what clamscan reports: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dhawal]# clamscan Reports.xls Reports.xls: HTML.Phishing.Bank-573 FOUND --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Known