Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam warning newer version, recommending older version

ZiGGie wrote: # freshclam ClamAV update process started at Fri Oct 27 18:15:03 2006 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.90RC1.1 Recommended version: 0.88.5 DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/faq.html main.cvd is up to date (version: 40, sigs: 64138, f-lev

[Clamav-users] Freshclam warning newer version, recommending older version

# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Fri Oct 27 18:15:03 2006 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.90RC1.1 Recommended version: 0.88.5 DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/faq.html main.cvd is up to date (version: 40, sigs: 64138, f-level: 8, builder:

Re: [Clamav-users] Complexity limit on (custom) signatures?

Kris Deugau wrote: From the problems I'm having with supposedly malformed signatures, it looks like there's an effective complexity limit; from the problems in *matching* a signature that's finally been found to be acceptable, it looks like there's a (lower) limit on what Clam can actually u

[Clamav-users] Complexity limit on (custom) signatures?

I've been attempting to lighten the load for SpamAssassin a little by creating signatures for the stock and pill spams that are flooding in these days. More specifically, I'm creating signatures for the attached images in the spams. (Upgrading SA, to be able to use OCR plugins and so on, is not r

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam misidentifying portfile.dll

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:40:57 -0500 "Thomas Raef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been running clamwin on some Windows XP systems with Quickbooks > installed. This is not a ClamWin mailing list. Please first verify the problem exists in ClamAV and then report a false positive via our website.

[Clamav-users] Clam misidentifying portfile.dll

I have been running clamwin on some Windows XP systems with Quickbooks installed. When I upgraded to the 88.5 version it misidentifies a Quickbooks dll (portfile.dll) as an infected file and quarantines it. How do I get this de-listed (unlisted)??? Thank you. ___

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV miss Win32/Stration worm

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:52:13 -0300 "Facundo Barrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi i've got ClamAV 0.88.5 running and it's updated well (Today at > 1:30 am), but it let pass thru this Worm "Today at 1:30 am" means that your database is pretty much outdated. -- oo. Toma

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV miss Win32/Stration worm

Hello, Le Vendredi 27 Octobre 2006 17:52, Facundo Barrera a écrit : > Hi i've got ClamAV 0.88.5 running and it's updated well (Today at > 1:30 am), but it let pass thru this Worm Please, submit the sample : http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi -- Cordialement / Best regards, Arnaud Jacques

[Clamav-users] ClamAV miss Win32/Stration worm

Hi i've got ClamAV 0.88.5 running and it's updated well (Today at 1:30 am), but it let pass thru this Worm Any ideas??, hopefully NOD32 catch it! Thanks. The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. __ NOD32 1.1841 (2006102

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter problem

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:38:09 -0300 Nicholas Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a login, and i logged in with it, and then it says that i dont > have permission to access you bug id . Should work now. -- oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter problem

I have a login, and i logged in with it, and then it says that i dont have permission to access you bug id . :-P Nicholas Anderson Administrador de Sistemas Unix LPIC-1 Certified Rede Fiocruz R. Steven Rainwater wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 07:51, Nicholas Anderson wrote: > >>> https:/

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter problem

On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 07:51, Nicholas Anderson wrote: > > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106 > > > I tried acessing this post but I was not able ... > :-P > You are not authorized to access bug #106 Hmmm... I get a warning saying the site has a broken security certificate but

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd 0.90RC1.1 version string

Hi Robert, I have 2 different machines using Gentoo Linux: one with ClamAV 0.88.5 and other with ClamAV 0.99RC1.1. The output is: /var/lib/clamav. clamd -V output was correct, VERSION answer was not. Interesting, that it has started to work :) # clamd -V ClamAV 0.90RC1.1/2121/Fri Oct 27 11:42

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter problem

R. Steven Rainwater wrote: > Thanks! I've filed a bug report and included sample error messages from > my log. It might be a good idea if some of the other people experiencing > this posted samples of their logs on the bug report too. > > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106 > I

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam says 0.90RC1.1 is outdated

On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:02:59AM +0200, Robert Allerstorfer said: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, 13:23 GMT-04 Jim Maul wrote: > > > Eric Peabody wrote: > >> # freshclam -v > (...) > >> Software version from DNS: 0.88.5 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation > >> is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.90RC1.

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd 0.90RC1.1 version string

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, 23:30 GMT+03 Ovidiu Bivolaru wrote: > Example: > v. 0.88.5 > ClamAV 0.88.5/2108/Thu Oct 26 19:21:59 2006 > v. 0.90RC1.1 > ClamAV 0.90RC1.1 I guess your problem is another one. What is the output of /path_to/clamscan --debug --no-summary --tempdir=/dev/null 2>&1 | sed -e

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam says 0.90RC1.1 is outdated

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, 13:23 GMT-04 Jim Maul wrote: > Eric Peabody wrote: >> # freshclam -v (...) >> Software version from DNS: 0.88.5 >> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! >> WARNING: Local version: 0.90RC1.1 Recommended version: 0.88.5 > Of course it says its outdated, 0.90RC1.1 != 0.