[Clamav-users] Re: False PayPal positive [FW: Your submission to ClamAV]

2006-10-12 Thread Sven Strickroth
"Daniel Tiefnig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ClamAV wrote: Dear ClamAV user, The following submissions have been processed and published: - 504853 The submission was a PayPal e-mail that was falsely classified as Email.Phishing.Pay-10. Now, it is still ide

[Clamav-users] Can't change dir to /usr/local/share/clamav

2006-10-12 Thread Pete
Hello, For the first time ever, I can't seem to get either clamd or freshclam to work on my Slackware Linux 11.0 (2.4.33.3) system. I've just installed clamav 0.88.4, using (as I always have with various distros of Linux) : ./configure make make install (root) This time however, when I try to r

[Clamav-users] Re: Can't change dir to /usr/local/share/clamav [resolved]

2006-10-12 Thread Pete
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:54:51PM +0100, Pete wrote: > Hello, > > For the first time ever, I can't seem to get either clamd or freshclam to > work on my Slackware Linux 11.0 (2.4.33.3) system. > > I've just installed clamav 0.88.4, using (as I always have with various > distros of Linux) : > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav on SCO Openserver Unix V 5.0.5

2006-10-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Oct 12, 2006, at 6:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Undefined first referenced symbol in file std_syslog output.o ntohl ../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so closelogou

[Clamav-users] Clamav on SCO Openserver Unix V 5.0.5

2006-10-12 Thread freekhessels
Hello All, I've tried to compile the Clamav sources on SCO Unix 5.0.5 with the gcc compiler v 2.95.2 19991024 In the manual of clamav is described that it should compile with this but actually it doesn't. I get first a message that strcasecmp is defined twice. I've modified all strcasecmp' s i

[Clamav-users] Re: False PayPal positive

2006-10-12 Thread Julian Mehnle
Daniel Tiefnig wrote: > ClamAV wrote: > > Dear ClamAV user, > > The following submissions have been processed and published: > > - 504853 > > The submission was a PayPal e-mail that was falsely classified as > Email.Phishing.Pay-10. Now, it is still identified as Phish. What should > I do now? Subm

[Clamav-users] False PayPal positive [FW: Your submission to ClamAV]

2006-10-12 Thread Daniel Tiefnig
ClamAV wrote: > Dear ClamAV user, > The following submissions have been processed and published: > - 504853 The submission was a PayPal e-mail that was falsely classified as Email.Phishing.Pay-10. Now, it is still identified as Phish. What should I do now? Submit it again? I know the DB people hav