Stephen Gran wrote:
su - clamav -s /bin/sh
strace -ff freshclam -o strace.out
I ran into this issue on one of three servers I upgraded to 0.88.2
today. After running your trace, it was obvious that another process had
the logfile already open for writing. An inspection via ps -ef | grep
f
>
> These are ldd results:
>
> # ldd -v /usr/lib/libclamav.so.1
These are the results of running ldd against the libraries. You need to do it
again
for clamd and for any other utilities you use (clamscan, 'frinstance).
>
> What am I looking for?
"Not found" messges.
There's an issue in doin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Isaac wrote:
> These are ldd results:
>
> # ldd -v /usr/lib/libclamav.so.1
[snip no problem]
>
> What am I looking for?
>Dennis Peterson:
>
> If you su - to the clamav user id and run ldd against the clamav binaries it
> should tell you what
These are ldd results:
# ldd -v /usr/lib/libclamav.so.1
libbz2.so.1 => /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1 (0x00b6a000)
libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib/sse2/libgmp.so.3 (0x00406000)
libcurl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3 (0x00852000)
libidn.so.11 => /usr/lib/libidn.so.11 (0x00111000)
On Tue, 2 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert Isaac wrote:
> > The libclamav.so.1 files are 777
>
> Danger, Will Robinson!
Probably not. It's a symbolic link. Those are always mode 777 .
Actually what lrwxrwxrwx comes out as numericly
===
Matthew van Eerde wrote:
> Robert Isaac wrote:
>> The libclamav.so.1 files are 777
>
> Danger, Will Robinson!
Hmmm, so are mine...
Ah, I see, libclamav.so.1 is a symbolic link to libclamav.so.1.0.17
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Robert Isaac wrote:
> The libclamav.so.1 files are 777
Danger, Will Robinson!
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-
Robert Isaac wrote:
The libclamav.so.1 files are 777
The libclamav.so.1.0.17 are 755
Bob
If you su - to the clamav user id and run ldd against the clamav
binaries it should tell you what is found and what is not found so far
as libraries are concerned. Using ldd as any other user may not
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:42:18PM -0400, Jeff Donsbach said:
> On 5/2/06, Robert Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >/usr/lib/libclamav.so.1 is a symbolic link to /usr/lib/libclamav.so.1.0.17
> >
> >/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1 is a symbolic link to
> >/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.0.17
>
> Hmm.
The libclamav.so.1 files are 777
The libclamav.so.1.0.17 are 755
Bob
___
Robert Isaac
Director/Web Admin
www.volvoclub.org.uk
Please include all previous text with reply
All messages are scanned with an antivirus scanner.
-Original Message
On 5/2/06, Robert Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/usr/lib/libclamav.so.1 is a symbolic link to /usr/lib/libclamav.so.1.0.17
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1 is a symbolic link to
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.0.17
Hmm. That seems ok, although I don't know why there are copies of this
stuff in b
/usr/lib/libclamav.so.1 is a symbolic link to /usr/lib/libclamav.so.1.0.17
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1 is a symbolic link to
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.0.17
Bob
___
Robert Isaac
Director/Web Admin
www.volvoclub.org.uk
Please include all pr
Are either of the libclamav.so.1 files symbolic links? If so, are they
pointing to non-existent files now after the upgrade? If so, fix them.
Jeff D
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Yesterday (May 1) I installed ClamAV 0.88.2 on our ProLiant server running
RHEL-4 and Apache 2.0.52 using rpms from
http://dag.wieers.com/packages/clamav/
I had set the daemon to run the update but got this in logwatch today:
+++
Daemon check list:
Database modification de
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:16:57 +0200
Roman ZARAGOCI wrote:
> >> For example, I would want to scan only new files added to homes
> >> directories or by checking the modification date of files.
> >> Maybe someone has already made this sort of script ?
> >
> > If you run something like:
> >
> >fin
15 matches
Mail list logo
