Re: [Clamav-users] How to disable single signature to avoid FP?

2006-02-27 Thread Noel Jones
At 12:21 AM 2/28/2006, Tomi Hakala wrote: Noel Jones wrote: > First unpack the *.cvd files (using sigtool --unpack) then edit the > resulting *db text files to remove the offending signatures. > > Next move all the *db files to some other directory. Tell clam to use > the new directory with th

Re: [Clamav-users] How to disable single signature to avoid FP?

2006-02-27 Thread Tomi Hakala
Noel Jones wrote: > First unpack the *.cvd files (using sigtool --unpack) then edit the > resulting *db text files to remove the offending signatures. > > Next move all the *db files to some other directory. Tell clam to use > the new directory with the DatabaseDirectory directive in clamd.conf or

Re: [Clamav-users] How to disable single signature to avoid FP?

2006-02-27 Thread Noel Jones
At 11:42 PM 2/27/2006, Tomi Hakala wrote: Hello, Is there a way to disable any single signature by hand? First unpack the *.cvd files (using sigtool --unpack) then edit the resulting *db text files to remove the offending signatures. Next move all the *db files to some other directory. Te

[Clamav-users] How to disable single signature to avoid FP?

2006-02-27 Thread Tomi Hakala
Hello, Is there a way to disable any single signature by hand? I'm asking this because of I think that I'm seeing false positives with XF.Sic.L but I cannot be certain as I don't have any of those FP files available. What makes me think of false positive is that I am running Kaspersky and Sophos

[Clamav-users] custom signatures not working

2006-02-27 Thread BitFuzzy
I'm trying to add a couple of custom phishing signatures using .ndb files within clamav's database directory For testing purposes I've used a simple phrase "Dear Paypal Members" and created a hex key for it Email.Phishing.Paypal.Test.0227001:0:*:446561722050617950616c204d656d6265720a I've als

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing Signatures

2006-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > >> BTW, how do you make the stats? Do you run two seperate clamd > > >> instances, one with official databases and the other one with Steve's > > >> sigs only? > > >> > > > > > > The milter I use records the name and time of the found virus/phishing > > > file > > > in a table. I sort out two l

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing Signatures

2006-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > > > The milter I use records the name and time of the found virus/phishing > > file > > in a table. I sort out two lists based on names. > > So, if one particular phish signature is listed in the official ClamAV > database, and is also listed in the user maintained database (phish.ndb), > w

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing Signatures

2006-02-27 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:50:50 -0800 "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Dennis Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:27:57 -0800 > >> Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > The follow-up. Steve - your list found ov

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing Signatures

2006-02-27 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "Dennis Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:27:57 -0800 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The follow-up. Steve - your list found over 3,000 Phishing attempts > while= the=20 > ClamAV list found just over 300. This is since Feb.

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing Signatures

2006-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:27:57 -0800 > Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The follow-up. Steve - your list found over 3,000 Phishing attempts while= > the=20 > > ClamAV list found just over 300. This is since Feb. 2. I didn't expect th= > at.=20 > > Thanks, bud! > > BTW, how do

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing Signatures

2006-02-27 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:27:57 -0800 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The follow-up. Steve - your list found over 3,000 Phishing attempts while the > ClamAV list found just over 300. This is since Feb. 2. I didn't expect that. > Thanks, bud! BTW, how do you make the stats? Do you run

Re: [Clamav-users] ping

2006-02-27 Thread ..lj
On Feb 27, 2006, at 05:03, Mark Grieveson wrote: I just installed clamav on Debian Sarge, using packages from the debian-volatile repository. When I test the daemon with ping, I do not get the answer "pong", which I've read somewhere that I should. Any idea how I can be sure the daemon i

Re: [Clamav-users] ping

2006-02-27 Thread Matt Fretwell
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:03:37 -0500 Mark Grieveson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just installed clamav on Debian Sarge, using packages from > the debian-volatile repository. When I test the daemon with > ping, I do not get the answer "pong", which I've read > somewhere that I should. Any idea

Re: [Clamav-users] ping

2006-02-27 Thread Nigel Horne
> I just installed clamav on Debian Sarge, using packages from the > debian-volatile repository. When I test the daemon with ping, I do not > get the answer "pong", which I've read somewhere that I should. Any > idea how I can be sure the daemon is working? Can it be set to check > mail coming i

[Clamav-users] ping

2006-02-27 Thread Mark Grieveson
I just installed clamav on Debian Sarge, using packages from the debian-volatile repository. When I test the daemon with ping, I do not get the answer "pong", which I've read somewhere that I should. Any idea how I can be sure the daemon is working? Can it be set to check mail coming in to t

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures: 369 sigs: 26th February 2006

2006-02-27 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Sunday 26 Feb 2006 14:01, Steve Basford wrote: > Hi, > > You'll all be glad to hear I don't intend to post here every time I do > an update of the sigs, > but as I've added a few sigs today and updated the main website a > little, I thought post to the list: > > http://www.sanesecurity.com/clama