Re: [Clamav-users] minor bug in manager.c

Bob Hutchinson wrote: On Friday 20 Jan 2006 18:01, Jim Maul wrote: Bob Hutchinson wrote: There is a thread going on in the logwatch ML, pertaining to a bug found in the freshclam logging. It would appear to occur when syslog is used rather than freshclam's own log in Fedora. Looking at clamav-

Re: [Clamav-users] minor bug in manager.c

On Friday 20 Jan 2006 18:01, Jim Maul wrote: > Bob Hutchinson wrote: > > There is a thread going on in the logwatch ML, pertaining to a bug found > > in the freshclam logging. It would appear to occur when syslog is used > > rather than freshclam's own log in Fedora. > > > > Looking at > > clamav-d

RE: [Clamav-users] minor bug in manager.c

> > There is a thread going on in the logwatch ML, pertaining to > a bug found in the freshclam logging. It would appear to > occur when syslog is used rather than freshclam's own log in Fedora. > > Looking at > clamav-devel/freshclam/manager.c > Line 67 > logg("ClamAV update process starte

Re: [Clamav-users] minor bug in manager.c

Bob Hutchinson wrote: There is a thread going on in the logwatch ML, pertaining to a bug found in the freshclam logging. It would appear to occur when syslog is used rather than freshclam's own log in Fedora. Looking at clamav-devel/freshclam/manager.c Line 67 logg("ClamAV update process s

Re: [Clamav-users] minor bug in manager.c

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:52:14 + Bob Hutchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a thread going on in the logwatch ML, pertaining to a bug found in > the freshclam logging. It would appear to occur when syslog is used rather > than freshclam's own log in Fedora. > > Looking at > clamav-d

[Clamav-users] minor bug in manager.c

There is a thread going on in the logwatch ML, pertaining to a bug found in the freshclam logging. It would appear to occur when syslog is used rather than freshclam's own log in Fedora. Looking at clamav-devel/freshclam/manager.c Line 67 logg("ClamAV update process started at %s", ctime(&cu

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with clamdscan, clamd, and procmail

On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 at 10:21:06 -0600, Bryan K. Walton wrote: > Hi, > I have a mail server setup using postfix, procmail, and > clamav. Mail is delivered to the postfix server and procmail handles > the local delivery. I have procmail configured to run clamdscan on > all mail larger than 15

Re: [Clamav-users] Not sure if configured correctly

On Thursday 19 Jan 2006 21:14, Gerard Seibert wrote: > I recently installed ClavAV on my FreeBSD 5.4 system. I am running > Sendmail as my MTA. > > Clam seems to be working fine except for one small thing. > > First, this is the entry I have in my /etc/rc.conf file for Clam. > > clamav_clamd_enable

RE: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format(was:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

Brian Morrison wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:46:21 +0100 in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] "M.S. Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like >> 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three' > > That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal > sh

RE: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was:W32.Blackmail.E@ mmundetected)

Nigel Horne wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Brian Morrison wrote: > > > M.S. Lucas wrote: > > > > > > > > In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like 15:30 is `half four' > > > > and not 'half past three' > > > > > > That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal > > > shortha

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Jerry K wrote: All Americans is a pretty broad finger to point. North America alone consist of Canada, the US and Mexico. I think that you should limit your frustration to the US alone. Jerry K He! He! Where I come from Americans = US (both Yankees and southerners). Mexicans, Canadians, A