On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, James Miller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav. I'm running 0.88 and have
the latest sigs (main version 35 and daily 1245).
I know I should figure out how to write a sig for this but is an update
expected soon?
Have you submitted a sample? If not, g
Hi all,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav. I'm running 0.88 and have
the latest sigs (main version 35 and daily 1245).
I know I should figure out how to write a sig for this but is an update
expected soon?
Thanks,
Jim
___
http://lurke
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:34:08PM -0500, Payal Rathod said:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Niek wrote:
> > The update was released a few minutes after you started this thread :)
>
> But on my friends amchine she still get,
> # freshclam
> ClamAV update process started at Wed Jan 18 2
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:34:08 -0500 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Payal Rathod
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The update was released a few minutes after you started this thread :)
>
> But on my friends amchine she still get,
> # freshclam
> ClamAV update process started at Wed Jan 18 22:59:58 2006
> SECUR
On 1/18/2006 6:34 PM +0100, Payal Rathod wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Niek wrote:
The update was released a few minutes after you started this thread :)
But on my friends amchine she still get,
# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Wed Jan 18 22:59:58 2006
SECURITY W
> -Original Message-
> From: Payal Rathod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 January 2006 17:34
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] virus not detected
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Niek wrote:
> > The update was released a few minutes after you started
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Payal Rathod wrote:
> daily.cvd is up to date (version: 1244, sigs: 840, f-level: 6, builder:
> sven)
FYI, I have three instances of WORM.VB-8 in my logs from yesterday, so even
1244 detects a non-zero number of these. Evidently just not the one you have
==
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Niek wrote:
> The update was released a few minutes after you started this thread :)
But on my friends amchine she still get,
# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Wed Jan 18 22:59:58 2006
SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES
See the
"Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I submitted a sample yesterday afternoon (GMT) to
> http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi , http://virusscan.jotti.org/ , and
> http://www.virustotal.com/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
Thanks! I have a question though. I created a directory
"/var/mail/quarantine" in wh
Payal Rathod wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:04:27PM +0200, Cevher wrote:
>
>
>>You can create a temporary signature...
>>
>>
>
>Please tell me how. I read signatures.pdf but ...
>$ sigtools --md5 virus_file > temp.hdb
>What do I do after that? I use clamd, so do I need to restart it?
>Wi
On 1/18/2006 6:18 PM +0200, Payal Rathod wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:11:19PM -0500, Chris Conn wrote:
update your defs, version 1245 gets it.
I updated and it was found. But that is weird, I always update every 1
hour and just a few mins back I manually tried to update, but the virus
w
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:11:19PM -0500, Chris Conn wrote:
> update your defs, version 1245 gets it.
I updated and it was found. But that is weird, I always update every 1
hour and just a few mins back I manually tried to update, but the virus
was not detected and now it is. I am interested in
update your defs, version 1245 gets it.
Payal Rathod wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:04:27PM +0200, Cevher wrote:
You can create a temporary signature...
Please tell me how. I read signatures.pdf but ...
$ sigtools --md5 virus_file > temp.hdb
What do I do after that? I use clamd, so do I
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:04:27PM +0200, Cevher wrote:
> You can create a temporary signature...
Please tell me how. I read signatures.pdf but ...
$ sigtools --md5 virus_file > temp.hdb
What do I do after that? I use clamd, so do I need to restart it?
With warm regards,
-Payal
___
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Me and many friends here are troubled by a new virus which has
> attachments like Video_part.mim, Attachment.hqx etc. We are getting this
> since last 36 hours and a friend submitted a few samples to clamav
Make sure your virus sigs are up to date. If
Payal Rathod wrote:
>Hi,
>Me and many friends here are troubled by a new virus which has
>attachments like Video_part.mim, Attachment.hqx etc. We are getting this
>since last 36 hours and a friend submitted a few samples to clamav
>interface 7 hours back. Symantech detects it since today mornin
Hi,
Me and many friends here are troubled by a new virus which has
attachments like Video_part.mim, Attachment.hqx etc. We are getting this
since last 36 hours and a friend submitted a few samples to clamav
interface 7 hours back. Symantech detects it since today morning, but
clamav is still no
I noticed recently that for a few versions the functionality level of
the daily.cvd file was showing as 7, but now it's back to 6 again.
Was this an error, or was it necessary?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
Thanks Rob, it worked.
- Original Message -
From: "Rob MacGregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ClamAV users ML"
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem starting freshclam
On 17/01/06, Rita Horve Agbali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Someone helpe
> I have the latest version of ClamAV and the signature files
> installed, however it fails to detect the Win32.Blackmail.F virus.
>
> My mail is delivered to a FreeBSD server that I run. One of
> the machines on the network is a WinXP machine running
> ZoneAlarm Suite. When this Windows machin
20 matches
Mail list logo
