On Thursday 05 January 2006 17:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> this is the clamav.net list. i get enough political diatribes in
>
> the newspaper
> magazines
> on television
> on the radio
> in email
> on assorted websites
> in IM
> from my mother
> from my brothers
> from friends
> from acquaint
At 03:31 PM 1/5/2006, Dale Lists wrote:
[some political ramblings]
this is the clamav.net list. i get enough political diatribes in
the newspaper
magazines
on television
on the radio
in email
on assorted websites
in IM
from my mother
from my brothers
from friends
from acquaintances
let's keep t
Mike Jackson wrote:
IMHO the strongest argument for 1) is the "innocent bystander" analogy.
Suppose you're manning a post office counter. A young man with his
head shaved and "Fight the Power" tattoos hands you a ticking package
with grease stains. He keeps looking over his shoulder. The
Gareth Blades said:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
>> > You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no
>> reason
>> > to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
>>
>> Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
>>
Shayne Lebrun said:
>> You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
>> to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
>
> Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
He does - I chose to address the greater stupidity.
dp
__
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 10:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> any legitimate MTA treating a 5xx response as a "I won't take it,
>>> but try my backup MXs" should be shot, along with the author(s) and
>>> the operator(s).
>>
>> This is an undecidable question. There are l
On Thursday 05 January 2006 10:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > any legitimate MTA treating a 5xx response as a "I won't take it, but
> > try my backup MXs" should be shot, along with the author(s) and the
> > operator(s).
>
> This is an undecidable question. There are legitimate arguments for bot
* On 05/01/06 22:02 +0300, Nsubuga Ronald Tash wrote:
> Hullo list,
> Happy New Year.
>
> Am running freeBSD 4.11
> I tried to upgrade my clamav and it seemed to have worked but surprisingly it
> has failed to work.
>
> when it try to start it fails to run at all and when i checked for the erro
On 1/5/06, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > IMHO the strongest argument for 1) is the "innocent bystander" analogy.
> >
> > Suppose you're manning a post office counter. A young man with his head
> > shaved and "Fight the Power" tattoos hands you a ticking package with
> > grease stai
IMHO the strongest argument for 1) is the "innocent bystander" analogy.
Suppose you're manning a post office counter. A young man with his head
shaved and "Fight the Power" tattoos hands you a ticking package with
grease stains. He keeps looking over his shoulder. The return address on
the
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 09:49, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:44 -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>>> On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
Still probably bad form, as you'd be spamming the living daylights
out of the p
On Thursday 05 January 2006 11:02, Nsubuga Ronald Tash wrote:
> Hullo list,
> Happy New Year.
happy new year!
> Am running freeBSD 4.11
> I tried to upgrade my clamav and it seemed to have worked but surprisingly
> it has failed to work.
mmk
> when it try to start it fails to run at all and
Hullo list,
Happy New Year.
Am running freeBSD 4.11
I tried to upgrade my clamav and it seemed to have worked but surprisingly it
has failed to work.
when it try to start it fails to run at all and when i checked for the errors
it displayed the following error.
Jan 5 19:05:02 2006 -> Log si
On Thursday 05 January 2006 09:49, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:44 -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
> > > Still probably bad form, as you'd be spamming the living daylights out
> > > of the poor recipient.
> >
> > this i
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:44 -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
> > Still probably bad form, as you'd be spamming the living daylights out of
> > the poor recipient.
>
> this is why you simply reject (5xx) the message at the gates.
And then they
On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
> > You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
> > to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
>
> Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
>
> "Hi, you got a mail f
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
> > You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
> > to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
>
> Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
>
> "Hi, you got a mail from
> You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
> to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
"Hi, you got a mail from so and so, but it had a virus, so I deleted it. If
you're act
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hi,
> I'm using Exim4, Courier and clamav.
> Clamav works fine on my server.
> When an infected message is detected, clamav removes it and sends a report
> to the sender.
You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
to believe it is going to th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
|
| This is a bad behaviour. You're bothering innocent people (email worms
| falsify senders).
|
Try to reject emails at least after DATA in SMTP trasaction.
|
|>Is it possible to inform the recipient about the rejected
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 at 10:06:57 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using Exim4, Courier and clamav.
> Clamav works fine on my server.
> When an infected message is detected, clamav removes it and sends a report
> to the sender.
This is a bad behaviour. You're bothering innocent people (em
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Exim4, Courier and clamav.
Clamav works fine on my server.
When an infected message is detected, clamav removes it and sends a report
to the sender.
Is it possible to inform the recipient about the rejected mail?
Yes it is possible, but clamav doesnt han
Hi,
I'm using Exim4, Courier and clamav.
Clamav works fine on my server.
When an infected message is detected, clamav removes it and sends a report
to the sender.
Is it possible to inform the recipient about the rejected mail?
Thanks in advance,
Michael
__
23 matches
Mail list logo
