Re: [Clamav-users] Suse RPMs for 0.87.1

2005-11-22 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Philip Craig wrote: Does anyone know when an rpm of clamav-0.87.1 will be available for SuSE distros? It seems the ones on ftp.suse.com are dated mid September and are still 0.87 You can always download the latest available .src.rpm, download the 0.87.1 source code, change the spec manuall

Re: [Clamav-users] Help with ArchiveMaxFileSize

2005-11-22 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:23:00 -0400 Roly Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ArchiveBlockMax -- oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\

[Clamav-users] Help with ArchiveMaxFileSize

2005-11-22 Thread Roly Morales
Hi, Well, I need your help, I have installed a mail server with postfix and clamav 0.87 in a Debian Sarge, the problem is that when I receive a mail with attach of 90 mgb. Clamav put the file in quarantine, I'm sure that the attach is clean, but I don't know why this happen, I was thinking t

[Clamav-users] Suse RPMs for 0.87.1

2005-11-22 Thread Philip Craig
Does anyone know when an rpm of clamav-0.87.1 will be available for SuSE distros? It seems the ones on ftp.suse.com are dated mid September and are still 0.87 Philip ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Worm.Sober.U not being recognized

2005-11-22 Thread Richard Pijnenburg
We also use Clamd with amavisd-new ClamAV 0.87.1/1183/Tue Nov 22 10:19:57 2005 Got the first message with it at 21:26 / 21/11/2005 localtime ( netherlands ) Ralph Angenendt wrote: Kevin W. Gagel wrote: I'm seeing the same thing here. My uvscan sees sober but since I restarted the server this

Re: [Clamav-users] Worm.Sober.U not being recognized

2005-11-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Kevin W. Gagel wrote: > I'm seeing the same thing here. My uvscan sees sober but > since I restarted the server this morning at 10am there have > been zero detections of anything from clamd at all. Only > seven detections from uvscan over the same time period. Strange. No problem here - we're usin