On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Robert Stampfli wrote:
On Linux, with the new ClamAV 0.86, I'm seeing a significant
jump in the size of clamav-milter (w/o --external) each time
a new database is loaded. Is there per-chance a memory leak
in the new code in this area? I did not observe this on
earlier rele
On Linux, with the new ClamAV 0.86, I'm seeing a significant
jump in the size of clamav-milter (w/o --external) each time
a new database is loaded. Is there per-chance a memory leak
in the new code in this area? I did not observe this on
earlier releases.
Rob
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 18:26 -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 01:43 PM Tuesday, 6/21/2005, you wrote -=>
>
> >>Since sendmail 8.13.3 was released 1/12/2005, and your mfapi.h files date
> >>shows
> >>Aug 20 2004, its probably from a previous (older) version of sendmail.
> >>
> >>Get the latest/greatest
At 09:19 PM Tuesday, 6/21/2005, Nigel Horne wrote -=>
On Tuesday 21 Jun 2005 19:28, Ed Kasky wrote:
> I am experiencing a problem when trying to compile 0.86 with milter that
> sems to be happening only in this release. 0.85.1 compiles no problem on
> the same system.
>
> With 0.86 I get the fol
On Tuesday 21 Jun 2005 19:28, Ed Kasky wrote:
> I am experiencing a problem when trying to compile 0.86 with milter that
> sems to be happening only in this release. 0.85.1 compiles no problem on
> the same system.
>
> With 0.86 I get the following running "make":
> /usr/src/clamav-0.86/clamav-mil
At 01:43 PM Tuesday, 6/21/2005, you wrote -=>
Since sendmail 8.13.3 was released 1/12/2005, and your mfapi.h files date
shows
Aug 20 2004, its probably from a previous (older) version of sendmail.
Get the latest/greatest sendmail and install it and libmilter.
mfapi.h is dated Aug 20 2004 for b
Since sendmail 8.13.3 was released 1/12/2005, and your mfapi.h files date shows
Aug 20 2004, its probably from a previous (older) version of sendmail.
Get the latest/greatest sendmail and install it and libmilter.
Dan Sjolseth
mfapi.h is dated Aug 20 2004 for both the 8.13.3 and 8.13.4 ve
Quoting Ed Kasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 11:35 AM Tuesday, 6/21/2005, you wrote -=>
> >Ed Kasky wrote:
> >>I am experiencing a problem when trying to compile 0.86 with milter that
> >>sems to be happening only in this release. 0.85.1 compiles no problem on
> >>the same system.
> >>
> >>With 0.8
At 11:35 AM Tuesday, 6/21/2005, you wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote:
I am experiencing a problem when trying to compile 0.86 with milter that
sems to be happening only in this release. 0.85.1 compiles no problem on
the same system.
With 0.86 I get the following running "make":
/usr/src/clamav-0.86/
John Gallagher wrote:
> Depending on your active directory structure it is relatively simple
> to grab the exchange users so your mail relay can make this decision
> before passing the mail on to the exchange server. You may need to
> work on the script a little to pull aliases and mail forward inf
Steffen Heil wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>>>Does Exchange 2000 still accept mail for non-existent users, as it
>>>does for 5.5?
>>
>>Unless there's a feature/setting I'm missing, yes it does.
>
>
> No.
>
> But it is no predefined feature.
> You need to do this, as you do most in unix/linux: You need to d
Ed Kasky wrote:
I am experiencing a problem when trying to compile 0.86 with milter
that sems to be happening only in this release. 0.85.1 compiles no
problem on the same system.
With 0.86 I get the following running "make":
/usr/src/clamav-0.86/clamav-milter/clamav-milter.c:1577: undefin
I am experiencing a problem when trying to compile 0.86 with milter that
sems to be happening only in this release. 0.85.1 compiles no problem on
the same system.
With 0.86 I get the following running "make":
/usr/src/clamav-0.86/clamav-milter/clamav-milter.c:1577: undefined
reference to `
On 6/20/2005 10:24 PM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote:
Just because people have submited those adware
samples, it does not mean the people must have caught
them with ClamAV right ?
Get a product dedicated to spyware/adware scanning.
Niek
___
http://lurker
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, GRISERI Giovanni wrote:
I caught a false positive "Trojan.Netdevil.15-2 FOUND" on many self
extracting exe files made with WINRAR version 3.4.2.
clamd version 0.85.1
s.o.: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1, kernel 2.4.27
Please submit samples (and mark as a false positive) here:
htt
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:18:08 -0700 (PDT) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] suneel cumar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Am just trying to debug the clamav-0.85.1. But it
> seems to give lot of error which is am not very much
> not able to solve and no document for newer whether it
> consist of clamd
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:45:22AM -0400, Jim Maul said:
> suneel cumar wrote:
> >
> >Jun 20 19:35:01 sunil amavis[24550]: (24550-07)
> >ClamAV-clamd: Can't connect to UNIX socket
> >/usr/sbin/clamscan: No such file or directory,
> >retrying (2)
>
> maybe you shouldnt be passing /usr/bin/clamscan
suneel cumar wrote:
Hi All,
Am just trying to debug the clamav-0.85.1. But it
seems to give lot of error which is am not very much
not able to solve and no document for newer whether it
consist of clamd daemon to listen the reuest from
socket or not . Clamd is not visible for me. Is it
Clamd is
Hi All,
Am just trying to debug the clamav-0.85.1. But it
seems to give lot of error which is am not very much
not able to solve and no document for newer whether it
consist of clamd daemon to listen the reuest from
socket or not . Clamd is not visible for me. Is it
Clamd is required and if yes is
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of suneel cumar
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:42 PM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: [Clamav-users] problem with clamav-0.85.1
>
>
> i have upgraded the clamav 0.74 to 0.85.1.
>
ClamAV has c
Hi
> > Does Exchange 2000 still accept mail for non-existent users, as it
> > does for 5.5?
>
> Unless there's a feature/setting I'm missing, yes it does.
No.
But it is no predefined feature.
You need to do this, as you do most in unix/linux: You need to define an
custom event sink. You can do
On Jun 21, 2005, at 04:40 AM, Dave Wells wrote:
Hi,
A few people have asked for an attachement instead of the script being
in-line so I have re-posted this as an attachment.
Regards
Dave Wells
-Original Message-
From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2005 17:56
To:
Hi,
A few people have asked for an attachement instead of the script being
in-line so I have re-posted this as an attachment.
Regards
Dave Wells
-Original Message-
From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2005 17:56
To: Dave Wells
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Analyze Per
I caught a false positive "Trojan.Netdevil.15-2 FOUND" on many self
extracting exe files made with WINRAR version 3.4.2.
clamd version 0.85.1
s.o.: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1, kernel 2.4.27
Anyone else found the same problem ?
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/lis
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, George Chelidze wrote:
The error messages are:
sh: /usr/sbin/sendmail: No such file or directory
After fast investigation I found that SENDMAIL_BIN changed from
"/usr/lib/sendmail" to "/usr/sbin/sendmail". The reason why I am affected
with thi change is that I run clamd/c
The error messages are:
sh: /usr/sbin/sendmail: No such file or directory
After fast investigation I found that SENDMAIL_BIN changed from
"/usr/lib/sendmail" to "/usr/sbin/sendmail". The reason why I am
affected with thi change is that I run clamd/clamav-milter under chroot
and there was no /
26 matches
Mail list logo
