Yes, can you please give me the sample of that perl ?
Thank you very much.
Christopher
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:26:03 +0100
From: Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ONLINE VIRUS SCANNER
To: ClamAV users ML
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text
Thanks for the reply.
How do I know where the binary files are located?
also I did chmod the perl script to 755.
also when I change the command to 'ls -l',
I did see the files on the dir.
--- Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mr Prince Simon said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a simple qu
On Monday 25 Apr 2005 15:19, Jon wrote:
> Do you know a good way of testing it live. Can you sent the testfile
> that is included in the dist. by mail?
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
> /jon
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Thanks for extesive answer!
Do you know a good way of testing it live. Can you sent the testfile
that is included in the dist. by mail?
/jon
Daniel J McDonald said the following on 2005-04-25 14:50:
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 13:53 +0200, Jon wrote:
Hi,
Does clamAV by default serach through attachm
I use Spamassassin+procmail+clamav-milter. This way procmail calls spamd to
filter out spam and clamav-milter filters mail for virii via clamd. :)
--
<>
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On 2005-04-25 13:22:07 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
> > Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
>
> I do not know. I use postfix and clamsmtp. The problem with procmail
> is that it works at delivery level and may have lost some envelope
> infor
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 13:53 +0200, Jon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does clamAV by default serach through attachments?
yes. In recent versions of code the --mbox flag has become default, and
you really have to try hard to remove ScanMail from clamd
> I have read somewhere
> that it does but not .zip
Suppo
Hi,
Does clamAV by default serach through attachments? I have read somewhere
that it does but not .zip .rar or exe if no add-ons are installed. Is
this correct? Im using it with Procmail an Clamassassin.
/jon
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users
ok, thanks.
Erwan David wrote:
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
Hi, ok.
Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
I do not know. I use postfix and clamsmtp. The problem with procmail
is that it works at delivery level and may have lost some envelope
information.
Spamassas
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
> Hi, ok.
>
> Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
I do not know. I use postfix and clamsmtp. The problem with procmail
is that it works at delivery level and may have lost some envelope
information.
Spamassassin is anti-spam and can be us
Hi, ok.
Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
/jon
Erwan David said the following on 2005-04-25 11:44:
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
I see many are using clamav-milter. Whar is the diffrence in this approach?
milter is the sendmail filtering interface. clamav-milte
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
> I see many are using clamav-milter. Whar is the diffrence in this approach?
milter is the sendmail filtering interface. clamav-milter is the way
to use clamav using this interface.
--
Erwan David
==
Trusted L
I see many are using clamav-milter. Whar is the diffrence in this approach?
/jon
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Monday 25 Apr 2005 02:04, Mr Prince Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple question and maybe someone can explain
> to me what happend.
>
> I have a perl script
> ---
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
> my $hashcommand ="clamscan -r -i -l
> /home/clamav/scan.txt /www
On Monday 25 Apr 2005 07:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a local http server on my fedora core 1, I have been using ClamAV
> with DansGuardian, Clamuko, clamav-milter at that server.
> can I make it to be an online clam av scanner for my local client ?
By "online" do you mean "web based" tha
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 15:29 +1000, Yuri Nosyrev wrote:
> Look at clamd.txt (attachment) for clamd startup log (clamd is running
> under djb's daemontools) with debug option turned on - it seems to be
> clean, but while trying to run clamdscan clamd's log shows:
>
> 2005-04-25 14:27:33.564011500
16 matches
Mail list logo
