Brian Bruns wrote:
The issue with return codes in 1.5.13 was fixed in a 1.5.14 snapshot
which is what this user is using. I know all about the return code
issue, and was ready to fork the Cygwin source code to fix it if they
didn't fix it themselves. With the latest snapshots, everything is
retur
On Friday, March 11, 2005 4:22 PM [EST], René Berber wrote:
> Brian Bruns wrote:
>
>> Its Cygwin, so I'll have to diagnose this with my user, since I'm
>> not seeing these problems on my end.
>
> That explains everything: Cygwin version 1.5.13-1 (the latest)
> changed the way it reports exit codes
Brian Bruns wrote:
Its Cygwin, so I'll have to diagnose this with my user, since I'm not
seeing these problems on my end.
That explains everything: Cygwin version 1.5.13-1 (the latest) changed the way
it reports exit codes to Windows.
Inside a Cygwin shell everything is normal (in your case the s
On Friday, March 11, 2005 3:12 PM [EST], René Berber wrote:
>
> 128 means the program core-dumped.
>
> It's not a normal return code, those are documented at the end of
> man clamscan, it's a stopping/termination reason given by the OS.
> Just out of curiosity, in which OS are you seeing this?
Its
Brian Bruns wrote:
I'm sure this has probably been asked before, but I wasn't able to
find it in the mailing list archives or the documentation - is there a
list somewhere, either in the source code or in the docs, or on the
web, which lists what each return code that clamscan gives back means?
I'v
Hey all,
I'm sure this has probably been asked before, but I wasn't able to
find it in the mailing list archives or the documentation - is there a
list somewhere, either in the source code or in the docs, or on the
web, which lists what each return code that clamscan gives back means?
I've got s
> Oversized.Zip
> >
> From man clamscan:
> --block-max
>Mark archives as viruses (e.g.
>RAR.ExceededFileSize,
>Zip.ExceededFilesLimit) if max-files, max-space,
>or max-recursion is reached.
> --max-recur
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rainer
> Zocholl
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:36 PM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Funny pathes
>
>
>
> /tmp/clamav-178c630c01f4f986/usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam.rar
/tmp/clamav-178c630c01f4f986/usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam.rar:
ClamAV-Test-File FOUND
/tmp/clamav-178c630c01f4f986/usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam.zip:
ClamAV-Test-File FOUND
/tmp/clamav-235ce24142354262/usr/share/classpath/glibj.zip:
Zip.ExceededFilesLimit FOUND
/tmp/clamav-fbb1808681386c40
Jordi Escolà MartínPriceWin Networks (Grupo CD World)Desarrollo
de Proyectos
C/ Gomis 1 - 08023 BarcelonaTel. 902 332266 - Fax. 902 113614
Este
email ha sido escaneado en busca de virus informáticos por elservicio
> > Update to at least 0.83b.
>
> would this be in the nightly snapshots (ie clamav-devel)?
Yes
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:02:14AM +, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Update to at least 0.83b.
would this be in the nightly snapshots (ie clamav-devel)?
--
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
>Am I missing anything important?
>Thanks in advance...
>Edward W. Ray
>CISSP, MCSE 2003+Security, P.E. GCIA, GCIH
>NetSec Design & Consulting
I would install postfix and remove sendmail (use apt or yum) get the apt rpm
from dag it will make things much easier.
ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/dag/
Update to at least 0.83b.
-Nigel
On Friday 11 Mar 2005 07:23, christian laubscher wrote:
> i am running .83, clamav-milter w/o clamd, freshclam on slack 9.1.
> low load, but persistent flow of incoming messages ( a few hundred mails
> a day, no bad peaks).
>
> normally, shortly after a successful
14 matches
Mail list logo