Mal Herring wanted us to know:
>Hello ClamAV-Users,
>I am running Clam on a Gentoo box, However the latest version is not yet
>in Portage...
>Does anyone know how much of a mission it would be to "un-merge" my
>current .80 version and install the latest from source ?
emerge --unmerge clamav
tar -
> If you do "ps ax|grep freshclam" what shows up?
5563 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/freshclam -d -c 2 -l
/var/log/clam-update.log
9234 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep freshclam
> Similarly, what does "find / -name freshclam" show?
find: /var/spool/amavis/amavis-20050121T184209-09119: No such file
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:38:55 -, Mal Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ClamAV 0.80/507Mon Sep 27 10:53:21 2004
Well, the one in your path is correct then. Where are you seeing the
error about the functionality version?
If you do "ps ax|grep freshclam" what shows up?
Similarly, what does "
What does "freshclam --version" say?
--
ClamAV 0.80/507Mon Sep 27 10:53:21 2004
ta
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:30:06 -, Mal Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok - I got confused as freshclam is telling me ClamAV install is
> outdated and gives me a functionality level of 2
Which suggests you've got a manually installed version in your path.
What does "freshclam --version"
I have been running clamav 0.80 on solaris with local unix socket since
October. Clamd stops accepting requests for me as well, but it's sporadic
unlike yours. It usually runs 1 to 3 weeks at a time without a problem. I
have a cron check and restart if it's doesn't respond.
_
0.80 is the lastest release.
0.81rc1 is just a Release Candidate.
---
Ok - I got confused as freshclam is telling me ClamAV install is
outdated and gives me a functionality level of 2
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Goudal wrote:
>
> I'm using 1.2.1 I'll try 1.2.2 monday, than the 0.81 if it does not work.
>
I would definitely do that. 1.2.1 has a known crashing bug.
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:16:51 GMT
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamd hanging
>
>On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 11:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>=20
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> I'm running clamd (clamav 0.80) on a solaris 9 server in front of amavisd=
>=20
>> 2.2.1
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 11:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running clamd (clamav 0.80) on a solaris 9 server in front of amavisd
> 2.2.1 with a local unix socket.
>
> About 2 hours after we start clamd it stops accepting requests. The daemon is
> running, there is non speci
--- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll have a look into it, thanks for trying the
> options and
> sending me the feedback.
Thank YOU for all the work. Having tried some other
commercial products, e.g. RAV and then Vexira, I dare
say clamav-milter is waay better in the ease of
ins
I'll have a look into it, thanks for trying the options and
sending me the feedback.
-Nigel
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
--- N Fung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry if I wasn't clear about this; when I
> tested
> it with these flags:
>
> -HNPCl --max-children=5
> --quarantine=quart
>
> Note that -o was NOT used.
>
> The infected mail was NOT delivered to the local
> user
> user "quart." The infected mail
--- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 Jan 2005 14:46, N Fung wrote:
> >
> > --- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday 21 Jan 2005 14:15, N Fung wrote:
> > > > --- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Presumably you ran clamd with 0.8
On Friday 21 Jan 2005 14:46, N Fung wrote:
>
> --- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Friday 21 Jan 2005 14:15, N Fung wrote:
> > > --- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Presumably you ran clamd with 0.80. Please start
> > > > clamd as you did
> > > > with 0.80, d
--- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 Jan 2005 14:15, N Fung wrote:
> > --- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Presumably you ran clamd with 0.80. Please start
> > > clamd as you did
> > > with 0.80, disable --internal, restart
> clamav-milter
> > > and report t
On Friday 21 Jan 2005 14:15, N Fung wrote:
> --- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Presumably you ran clamd with 0.80. Please start
> > clamd as you did
> > with 0.80, disable --internal, restart clamav-milter
> > and report the results.
>
> As per your instructions, I did:
>
> Starte
--- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Presumably you ran clamd with 0.80. Please start
> clamd as you did
> with 0.80, disable --internal, restart clamav-milter
> and report the results.
As per your instructions, I did:
Started clamd first and ran clamav-milter withOUT
--internal. Result
On Friday 21 Jan 2005 07:06, N Fung wrote:
> > > Just upgraded from 0.80 to 0.81rc1. I'm running
> > > clamav-milter with these flags:
> > >
> > > -HNPCol --internal --max-children=5 \
> > > --quarantine=quart@
> > >
> > > When 0.80 dectected an infected message, it'll
> >
> > direct
> >
> > > it
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mal Herring
>
>
> Hello ClamAV-Users,
> I am running Clam on a Gentoo box, However the latest version is not yet
> in Portage...
>
> Does anyone know how much of a mission it would be to "un-merge" my
>
Hello,
I'm running clamd (clamav 0.80) on a solaris 9 server in front of amavisd
2.2.1 with a local unix socket.
About 2 hours after we start clamd it stops accepting requests. The daemon is
running, there is non special message either in amavis log or clamd log.
It does not work either with
21 matches
Mail list logo
