[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Otherwise, if it is HTML, filter it through w3m, lynx, or some other
html to text converter.
This is the dangerous part. If there's going to be any way for a malignant
HTML email to overflow a buffer, it's here.
Well it's always about moving
Hey folks,
I am just starting to use ClamAV on an OpenBSD 3.5-STABLE machine, and
I needed to verify a thing or two.
I am running clamd and freshclam successfully. I'd like to use
clamdscan to speed things up, but it doesn't appear to support the --move
option that clamscan does. It poin
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
I was under the impression that MIMEDefang can do this. But I'm
afraid my users wouldn't like it, so I never looked into it closely.
That said I think this is very easy to implement:
Check if a mime entity is multipart/alternative with a text part: If
it is, replace it with t
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> Otherwise, if it is HTML, filter it through w3m, lynx, or some other
> html to text converter.
This is the dangerous part. If there's going to be any way for a malignant
HTML email to overflow a buffer, it's here.
___
http://li
On 2004-11-15 16:23:19 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> I find it interesting though that I've yet to hear from anyone
> commenting on my proposal to create a filter that will extract and
> convert all emails into pure text, or reformat it so only certain
> things can get through as an attachmen
Here Here ...
An excellent product and a huge thanks to ALL who have contributed to it !
--
Ken Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Announcingple require machines as desperately as that to prevent themselves
>> from falling for fraud attempts...
>
> ...then they're pretty much behaving in the manner humanity always has and
> always will.
>
>> To those of you who argue that ClamAV sho
On Nov 16, 2004, at 12:52 PM, Minica, Nelson (EDS) wrote:
1024 viruses blocked in the last month (after 152,000 emails blocked
by RBL's,etc)
68 were phishing attacks my users appreciated not seeing
Then SpamAssassin flagged 1500 and Mimedefang removed 1300
attachments…
Overlapping products and
I would like to second your thoughts on this matter. All to often we users tend to take this software and all the work behind it for granted. The vast majority of posts on this lists are problems with this or that, or why didn't you do it this way or that way. I'd like to just join in and say to al
Title: Good job ClamAV team!
1024 viruses blocked in the last month (after 152,000 emails blocked by RBL's,etc)
68 were phishing attacks my users appreciated not seeing
Then SpamAssassin flagged 1500 and Mimedefang removed 1300 attachments…
Overlapping products and multiple lines of defen
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:38:05 -0500 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Frank DeChellis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I just upgraded from Clam 0.75 to Clam 0.80. Ownerships seem OK. I
> could not see anywhere that required major config changes. Everything
> works perfectly with 0.75. The freshcla
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> If people require machines as desperately as that to prevent themselves
> from falling for fraud attempts...
...then they're pretty much behaving in the manner humanity always has and
always will.
> To those of you who argue that ClamAV should detect ph
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:32:19 + in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Paul Dobson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A search solved the problem. I had forgotten that as part of the
> original install the instructions had been to copy clamscan and
> freshclam to/usr/bin! Now removed and working ok.
Good! Pleased
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 at 1:31:22 +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
>
> If people require machines as desperately as that to prevent themselves
> from falling for fraud attempts, humanity is truly doomed.
>
It already is ;-) .
Anybody who doubts it can have a look:
http://www.manbottle.com/humor/Furthe
A search solved the problem. I had forgotten that as part of the original
install the instructions had been to copy clamscan and freshclam to
/usr/bin! Now removed and working ok.
Paul
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Hi
I just upgraded from Clam 0.75 to Clam 0.80. Ownerships seem OK. I could
not see anywhere that required major config changes. Everything works
perfectly with 0.75. The freshclam update worked well. On startup, the
clamd.log seems fine.
Were there any major config changes that are require
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:29:29 + in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Paul Dobson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the thing to do is to uninstall 0.80 and look around for
> files that are left.
Yes, that would work, you might just try a comprehensive search before
you do something quite that drastic.
ClamAV users ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>The symptom you describe sounds like there is an old library somewhere
>else, but I forget when functionality level 2 was brought in, it might
>have been between 0.70 and 0.75, so whatever you had was older than this
>breakpoint. I'd say there is still a
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:01:07 + in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Paul Dobson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ClamAV users ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Looks like you have an old version of libclamav in your LD_PATH or
> >else you are running an old version of freshclam.
> >
> >I'd suggest very carefull
ClamAV users ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Looks like you have an old version of libclamav in your LD_PATH or else
>you are running an old version of freshclam.
>
>I'd suggest very carefully checking your installation and finding and
>clearing out the old stuff.
I would guess that the version I
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:57:33 + in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Paul Dobson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A symlink enables freshclam to start but I get an error message in the
> log saying that functionality is level 1 and level 3 is required.
Looks like you have an old version of libclamav in your LD_
No sorry it doesn't. I know how to install clamav - I've been running it
since 0.67.
Paul
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
A symlink enables freshclam to start but I get an error message in the log
saying that functionality is level 1 and level 3 is required.
Paul Dobson
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Trog wrote:
Please give a full definition of Spam and Malware/Viruses that do not
intersect, and will never intersect for all future Spam and Malware
such that we can be sure we know what you are requesting.
After reading the 100+ messages in this thread, I've gotta say I'm
Hi,
Versions:
Clam 0.80
Clamassassin 1.2.1
I have installed ClamAssassin with Sendmail.
Is there any way by which we can come to know if the virus was found in body
of the message or in attachment ?
I ask this because, if the virus is in attachment, we need to just delete
the attachment and no
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:31:22 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Julian Mehnle"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If people require machines as desperately as that to prevent
> themselves from falling for fraud attempts, humanity is truly doomed.
It always has been. Never mind the quality, feel the *width*.
26 matches
Mail list logo
