On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:43:29 +0100, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:14:43 +0530
Dilip M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My clam-update.log is as aboveis it up2date ?
Yes, your virus database is up to date.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
I tested using http://www.testvirus.o
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:58:07 +0100, Christoph Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello Dilip,
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 3:44:43 PM, you wrote:
DM> Hi,
DM> I just got Clam-AV and Freshclam working :) Was little tough :(
DM> I'm running Qmail on Redhat7.3
DM> # more /var/log/clam-update.log
DM>
Hello,
I'm proud to announce a really huge virus database update.
During Christmas, our virus database maintainer Denis De Messemacker
created over 7700 signatures (using sigtool, of course) from his virus
collection.
The signatures have been tested against 100 GB data of random files.
Also they
Hello Dilip,
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 3:44:43 PM, you wrote:
DM> Hi,
DM> I just got Clam-AV and Freshclam working :) Was little tough :(
DM> I'm running Qmail on Redhat7.3
DM> # more /var/log/clam-update.log
DM>
DM>
Nigel Horne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 6:12 pm, René Bellora wrote:
Fedora Core 1
Same as me. I don't know what else to suggest.
may be compare md5 hashes of the build directory?
regards,
René
---
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:44:15 -0500 (EST)
"Carl Holtje ;021;vcsg6;" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In your shutdown scripts, you might include a little block similar to:
>
>if [ -S "/tmp/clamd" ]
>then
> `rm /tmp/clamd`
>fi
>
> to ensure a clean restart...
or enable FixStaleSocket
In your shutdown scripts, you might include a little block similar to:
if [ -S "/tmp/clamd" ]
then
`rm /tmp/clamd`
fi
to ensure a clean restart...
Carl
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Matt wrote:
> that did it!
> blah... stupid little thing =)
>
> On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 14:03, Carl Holtje ;0
that did it!
blah... stupid little thing =)
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 14:03, Carl Holtje ;021;vcsg6; wrote:
> First thing to check: was the socket (/tmp/clamd) removed?
>
> If not, this will prevent clamd from loading...
>
> Hope it helps..
>
> Carl
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Matt wrote:
>
> > I'
First thing to check: was the socket (/tmp/clamd) removed?
If not, this will prevent clamd from loading...
Hope it helps..
Carl
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Matt wrote:
> I'm running clamscan 0.65 and it was working until the server was
> rebooted... now clamd won't start..
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
I'm running clamscan 0.65 and it was working until the server was
rebooted... now clamd won't start..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /usr/local/sbin/clamd -V
clamd / ClamAV version 0.65
however doing a /usr/local/sbin/clamd
just causes it to pause for a moment then return to the command prompt
and it ne
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 at 20:14:43 +0530, Dilip M wrote:
>
> My clam-update.log is as aboveis it up2date ?
Yes.
> Sometime back read that if we send mail to some site,it will reply with
> virus! Which ID ? so that i come to know that my clam-av in up2date and
> working fine:)
I don't know su
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:14:43 +0530
Dilip M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My clam-update.log is as aboveis it up2date ?
Yes, your virus database is up to date.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ClamAV.net
(\/)\. http://www.clam
Hi,
I just got Clam-AV and Freshclam working :) Was little tough :(
I'm running Qmail on Redhat7.3
# more /var/log/clam-update.log
ClamAV update process started at Tue Jan 6 20:03:08 2004
main.cvd is up to date (versio
Quoting Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Looks great. I will test it against our all infected word document
> samples today night. If you need some samples just let me know.
I've tested it against my collection of 345 Word and 58 Excel macro virus sample
documents without any problems.
At t
Hello
I can't seem to find a reference to this anywhere. I'm running exim-
4.24 with exiscan-acl patch revision 13 and clamav 0.65.
Clamd died on New Years Eve, causing all mail to be rejected with a
451. Simply restarting it resulted in its falling over regularly
(apparently every time it en
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 12:56:06 + (GMT)
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In case anyone is interested...
>
> I have completed the first version of an OLE2 file unpacker (as used
> in MS Office Documents >= Office97). It is currently at:
>
> http://www.uncon.org/files/ole2extract.c
>
> Shou
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:48:12 +
Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There appears to be some discussion going on on the Clamav-virusdb
> list this morning. I was under the impression that list was an
> announcement only list notifying of updates to the virus databases.
> Can this policy n
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2004 11:49 am, Diego d'Ambra wrote:
> Following up on discussion yesterday about option --mbox not being able
> to detect virus I've found another sample.
I can see what's wrong. I'll look into it ASAP and upload a fix to CVS.
> Any DB maintainers that want to take a look at the
In case anyone is interested...
I have completed the first version of an OLE2 file unpacker (as used in MS
Office Documents >= Office97). It is currently at:
http://www.uncon.org/files/ole2extract.c
Should extract all component files from Office documents.
Am interested in failures. Haven't te
Hi ,
I'm running Qmail on machine is Redhat 7.3
Everything was fine till i upgraded Clam-AV from 0-60 to 0.65.
Just Complied clam-av 0.65 as per
http://www.qmailrocks.org/qmailscanner_db.htm
i'm held up in this stage :(
# ./test_installation.sh -doit
setting QMAILQUEUE to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 at 10:48:12 +, Chris Hastie wrote:
> There appears to be some discussion going on on the Clamav-virusdb list this
> morning. I was under the impression that list was an announcement only list
> notifying of updates to the virus databases. Can this policy not be enforced
You
Following up on discussion yesterday about option --mbox not being able
to detect virus I've found another sample.
Since the sample has been sent to ClamAV through the ClamAV submission
system, I've remove any private information from the sample that can be
downloaded at http://www.softscan.dk/sam
There appears to be some discussion going on on the Clamav-virusdb list this
morning. I was under the impression that list was an announcement only list
notifying of updates to the virus databases. Can this policy not be enforced
somehow, restricting who can post to the list and ensuring the Reply-
* Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040105 19:50]: wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 at 13:32:31 -0300, René Bellora wrote:
> > Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> >
> > >A blind shot: does it make a difference if you run
> > >'clamscan -r videos.zip'?...
> > >
> > it doesn't:
> >
> > # clamscan -r videos.zi
24 matches
Mail list logo
