On 2003-11-29, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>The current CVS code contains a new directive: UseProcesses that will
>cause clamd to use processes instead of threads. Initial version but
>seems to work ;) It should be really useful for clamav-milter users.
Looks like clamd refuses to die on `killall clamd' w
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:07 , Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>On Saturday 29 Nov 2003 7:51 pm, Gianmarco wrote:
>
>> 2) Have the possibility to use a "template" like message for the mail that
>> is sent back to the sender/recipient/admin.
>
>That is already in the wish list. See the TODO at
On Saturday 29 Nov 2003 7:51 pm, Gianmarco wrote:
> 2) Have the possibility to use a "template" like message for the mail that
> is sent back to the sender/recipient/admin.
That is already in the wish list. See the TODO at the start of the source code.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer
On Saturday 29 November 2003 21:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 14:51, Gianmarco wrote:
> > 1) A possibility to automagically refuse some (defined in the config)
> > attachment like *.pif, *.lnk, *.scr and so on and generate an alert like
> > "UNAUTHORIZED MAIL ATTACH" etc et
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 14:51, Gianmarco wrote:
> 1) A possibility to automagically refuse some (defined in the config)
> attachment like *.pif, *.lnk, *.scr and so on and generate an alert like
> "UNAUTHORIZED MAIL ATTACH" etc etc...
>
> 2) Have the possibility to use a "template" like message
Probably they are more related to milter interface, but I'd like to know if it
is possible to do or to see in next versions:
1) A possibility to automagically refuse some (defined in the config)
attachment like *.pif, *.lnk, *.scr and so on and generate an alert like
"UNAUTHORIZED MAIL ATTACH"
I haven't tried this (since X-Original-To isn't yet supported) but it may be worth a
try.
Try diverting virused e-mails to an account using the --quarantine option,
the next version of clamav-milter will have moved the original To: list to an
X-Original-To: set of headers
so you can alias your -
I am finding this after updating to today's cvs:
003-11-29 17:13:56 1AQ8fM-00066n-1l malware acl condition: clamd:
ClamAV returned
/var/spool/exim/scan/1AQ8fM-00066n-1l/1AQ8fM-00066n-1l-1.com:
Zip module failure. ERROR
Sean
--
GPG Key Id 120A02FB ICQ: 679813 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:39:02 -0500
Flinn Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> There _are_ current issues with thread-based clamd (and
> >thread-based > software in general, as everything (memory, fd's
> >etc)is shared > between threads:
> >
> > No wonder there are issues with threading in clamd
On Nov 29, 2003, at 5:17 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
There _are_ current issues with thread-based clamd (and thread-based
software in general, as everything (memory, fd's etc)is shared
between threads:
No wonder there are issues with threading in clamd. When I pointed
the author at "Programming wit
Marc Balmer wrote:
There _are_ current issues with thread-based clamd (and thread-based
software in general, as everything (memory, fd's etc)is shared between
threads:
No wonder there are issues with threading in clamd. When I pointed the
author at "Programming with Posix Threads" he respon
There _are_ current issues with thread-based clamd (and thread-based
software in general, as everything (memory, fd's etc)is shared between
threads:
No wonder there are issues with threading in clamd. When I pointed the
author at "Programming with Posix Threads" he responded that he had no
ti
Marc Balmer wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
The current CVS code contains a new directive: UseProcesses that will
cause clamd to use processes instead of threads. Initial version but
seems to work ;) It should be really useful for clamav-milter users.
What are the advantages of processes vs. threads
Version 1.1.0 of smtp-vilter has been released on
http://www.etc.msys.ch/software/smtp-vilter/. smtp-vilter is a sendmail
milter that uses Clam AV clamd for virus scanning.
This version greatly enhances security as the milter can now run as
non-root and chrooted.
- mb
-
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
The current CVS code contains a new directive: UseProcesses that will
cause clamd to use processes instead of threads. Initial version but
seems to work ;) It should be really useful for clamav-milter users.
What are the advantages of processes vs. threads in this case? Doesn't
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 23:54:14 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:03:06 +0900
Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone explain me about the libclamav/scanners.c and this value
at the line 64 ? Should I increase it again ?
Please set it to 70
* Lynn Duerksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20031128 20:27]: wrote:
> > > echo $TIMESTAMP " restarting freshclam daemon"
> > > /usr/local/bin/freshclam -d -c 4
> > > --datadir=/var/amavisd/usr/local/share/clamav --log-verbose
> > > fi
> > >
> > >
> > > FYI - Since installing 0.65 this has record
17 matches
Mail list logo
