RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter

2003-10-02 Thread Michael D. Bathrick
Thanks, everyone. These responses have given me a clue to continue with the good fight. Mike Michael D. Bathrick President BerkshireNet, Inc 126 Fenn Street Pittsfield, MA 01201 (413) 442-7805 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SCHULZ, Wolf

Re: [Clamav-users] costs of running clam?

2003-10-02 Thread Ken McKittrick
Oh Geez Make a donation, send the Guys some stuff. They like hardware donations. :) We like it so much that we donated a FreeBSD server for testing. Ken McKittrick Senior Network Engineer USADatanet On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 10:53 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message ---

Re: [Clamav-users] costs of running clam?

2003-10-02 Thread Thomas Lamy
Tomasz Kojm wrote: Thanks for the responses. I was asking because our company was willing to make a donation but it seems clam is already well taken care of and does not Well, donations are always welcome ;) Best regards, Tomasz Kojm So what do you folks prefer? Machines, money, ... ? -- Thoma

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd foreground mode?

2003-10-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> See my other post that the socket is created with different permissions in > foreground vs background mode. Presumably this is due to umasking. That's right. It's now fixed in CVS. Thanks. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://w

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd foreground mode?

2003-10-02 Thread Kelsey Cummings
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:45:20PM -0400, Flinn Mueller wrote: > That is odd. You might want to check out this howto if you are trying > to supervise clamd > http://clamav.sourceforge.net/doc/clamd_supervised/clamd-daemontools- > guide.txt See my other post that the socket is created with diff

Re: [Clamav-users] costs of running clam?

2003-10-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> Thanks for the responses. I was asking because our company was willing to > make a donation but it seems clam is already well taken care of and does not Well, donations are always welcome ;) Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://

Re: [Clamav-users] Stdin problems

2003-10-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> > Nigel was talking about clamav - in some cases we save the input stream > > to disk (this is not efficient but allows on seekable access to data). > > It is on my "TODO" list to investigate alternatives, but there are far more Unfortunately there is no simple (and at least elegant) solution

Re: [Clamav-users] Stdin problems

2003-10-02 Thread Nigel Horne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 02 Oct 2003 5:35 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > Nigel was talking about clamav - in some cases we save the input stream > to disk (this is not efficient but allows on seekable access to data). It is on my "TODO" list to investigate alternatives

Re: [Clamav-users] Stdin problems

2003-10-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> > Actually pipes *are* temporary files, but we won't get OT with that. > > Erm, not on Linux. Well not in the 'anything getting written to disk' Nigel was talking about clamav - in some cases we save the input stream to disk (this is not efficient but allows on seekable access to data). Best

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd dies forever!

2003-10-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> Okay, I know this is not good at all, that I run the CVS version of clamav > on a production box. It's suicide. I've run the daily snapshots for some > time without disappointment when it comes to supervising the service with > daemontools. However, something in CVS seems to completely defy daemo

Re: [Clamav-users] Stdin problems

2003-10-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> Actually i sorted out the problem a couple of minutes after i send the email, > but didn't think to post to the list again :) All i had to do was set > StreamSaveToDisk in clamav.conf and it fixed all my problems. Be careful - stdin scanning in clamdscan is very experimental and completely un

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Clamav CVS (20030929) Broken on FREEBSD 4.x and 5.x !

2003-10-02 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20031002 15:31]: wrote: > Odhiambo Washington writes: > > >For the first time, clamd (cvs) died and did not wake up, even though I use > >daemontools. Nothing in the log, no core dump.. nothing. > > > >For experts with da

Re: [Clamav-users] HP-UX QUestion

2003-10-02 Thread Stewart MacLund
id: > * Stewart MacLund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20031002 00:42]: wrote: >> Question: >> >> Any reason anyone can think of that ClamAV will not run on HP-UX? >> >> I haven't actually tried compiling it yet, but i'd like to get it >> running on HP-U

Re: [Clamav-users] Stdin problems

2003-10-02 Thread Stephen White
Original Message > From Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thursday, 02 Oct 2003, 07:08 > > Actually pipes *are* temporary files, but we won't get OT with that. Erm, not on Linux. Well not in the 'anything getting written to disk' sense, processes get file descriptors for each end

[Clamav-users] Re: Clamav CVS (20030929) Broken on FREEBSD 4.x and 5.x !

2003-10-02 Thread Anand Buddhdev
Odhiambo Washington writes: For the first time, clamd (cvs) died and did not wake up, even though I use daemontools. Nothing in the log, no core dump.. nothing. For experts with daemontools, is there a way to capture other data outputted bt clamd other than the ones that go to the logfile? I don't

Re: [Clamav-users] Updated: clamav-devel-20030926 (OpenBSD Port)

2003-10-02 Thread Scott Deacon
Running on OBSD 3.3 root 7455 0.0 1.7 1044 820 ?? Ss 6:03PM0:14.11 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) _clamd 32260 0.0 1.0 11776 488 ?? Ss 6:03PM0:14.92 /usr/local/sbin/clamd root 23346 0.0 0.6 264 264 C0- S 6:03PM0:04.71 /usr/local/sbin

Re: [Clamav-users] HP-UX QUestion

2003-10-02 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Stewart MacLund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20031002 00:42]: wrote: > Question: > > Any reason anyone can think of that ClamAV will not run on HP-UX? > > I haven't actually tried compiling it yet, but i'd like to get it running > on HP-UX 10.xx or 11.xx. Hi Sundie,

[Clamav-users] clamd dies forever!

2003-10-02 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Okay, I know this is not good at all, that I run the CVS version of clamav on a production box. It's suicide. I've run the daily snapshots for some time without disappointment when it comes to supervising the service with daemontools. However, something in CVS seems to completely defy daemontools!