Does the 20030909 snapshot include the corrected code?
> > Is there a fix for the defunct clamd processes that happen
> when using the
> > clamav-milter? Has it been fixed in CVS yet?
>
> Yes, it has been fixed in CVS.
---
This sf.net email
The new port 20030909? Clamd, clamdscan, or clamscan? With an error
message? What were you scanning?
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 02:40 PM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
I actually just upgraded to devel-20030909. The snapshot kept crashing
:(
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
Anyone else hav
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 at 9:51:08 +0100, Schmidt, Patrick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thank you for this great antivirus project, it detached the commercial
> AntiVir product at our gateways.
>
> will there be plans for detection of dialers in the future, like AntiVir
> did?
If the files are hostile, then
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:29:40AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey Nigel & others,
>
> I'd like to test clamav-milter with some of my small clients (40 mail
> users). The package with 0.60 still has that crashing problem, are the
> more recent versions more stable? I really think the clama
I actually just upgraded to devel-20030909. The snapshot kept crashing :(
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
Anyone else having issues compiling 20030908 on OpenBSD 3.3?
Regards,
Flinn
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek
Hello,
thank you for this great antivirus project, it detached the commercial
AntiVir product at our gateways.
will there be plans for detection of dialers in the future, like AntiVir
did?
Regards,
Patrick
--
Patrick Schmidt
Dezernat 12 ADV
StUA Düsseldorf
Tel. 0211 / 5778-245
Fax. 0211 / 5
Anyone else having issues compiling 20030908 on OpenBSD 3.3?
Regards,
Flinn
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Clamav-users mailing lis
Hey Nigel & others,
I'd like to test clamav-milter with some of my small clients (40 mail
users). The package with 0.60 still has that crashing problem, are the
more recent versions more stable? I really think the clamav-milter
is/will be the best solution for sendmail.
My clients use FreeBSD 4
Hey Flinn,
No problem! I'm just the co-maintainer ;)
Sometimes other things just have a higher priority.
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
ClamAntiVirus
*Update (09/09/2003)
*I've updated the devel port to 20030909. Many thanks for everyone who
sent feedback. I got lots of input about milter and ripm
> Dennis Skinner wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I thought I remembered something about this, but I can't find it
> >anywhere in my archives of this list. Does clamd not play nice with
> >logrotate?
> >
> >
>
> Clamd doesnt handle SIGHUP signal to reopen log file, so cooperation
> with logrota
> Is there a fix for the defunct clamd processes that happen when using the
> clamav-milter? Has it been fixed in CVS yet?
Yes, it has been fixed in CVS.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(\/)\. http://www.konarski.edu.pl/~zolw
\
Didn't know they were that different... I always was under the impression (because I never had to deal with it) pth is a drop in posix threads implementation. If I remember correctly FreeBSD was requiring gnu pth2 with clamav.
LIB_DEPENDS=pth.20:${PORTSDIR}/devel/pth
pthread_mutex_t is ref
Dennis Skinner wrote:
Hello all,
I thought I remembered something about this, but I can't find it
anywhere in my archives of this list. Does clamd not play nice with
logrotate?
Clamd doesnt handle SIGHUP signal to reopen log file, so cooperation
with logrotate is poor.
This should be easy
> Doesn't gnu-pth2 work under NetBSD for this purpose?
How should this work? Both of this implementations use different
primitives, structures and definitions. For example there is no
pthread_mutex_t definition in pth.h.
regards
oliver
Am Mit, 2003-09-10 um 00.04 schrieb Flinn Mueller:
> Doesn'
14 matches
Mail list logo
