[clamav-users] VMM Killing

2002-12-11 Thread Mário Luis Ghoneim
Dear Thomazs, Does this list have history? Once I asked about a lot of process started simultaneously... and you gave some tips but I don´t remember... The process eat all the RAM and swap memory, and the server to lock... So some messages appears at screen, some like VMM Killing process sendmail a

Re: [clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Jay Swackhamer
I've been in the habit of doing reply-to-all -- which ended up sending multiple copies to the list. Sorry for the dupes. How embarassing. :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Jay Swackhamer
Nathan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > little under 8000 virus's it scans for vs the 65000 virus's Norton is > currently scanning for. Keep in mind that Norton Antivirus et al have very old legacy virii definitions in their databases. It's very unlikely you'll encounter some 1985 boot sector D

Re: [clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Jay Swackhamer
Nathan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > little under 8000 virus's it scans for vs the 65000 virus's Norton is > currently scanning for. Keep in mind that Norton Antivirus et al have very old legacy virii definitions in their databases. It's very unlikely you'll encounter some 1985 boot sector D

Re: [clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Jay Swackhamer
Nathan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > little under 8000 virus's it scans for vs the 65000 virus's Norton is > currently scanning for. Keep in mind that Norton Antivirus et al have very old legacy virii definitions in their databases. It's very unlikely you'll encounter some 1985 boot sector D

Re: [clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Jay Swackhamer
Nathan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > little under 8000 virus's it scans for vs the 65000 virus's Norton is > currently scanning for. Keep in mind that Norton Antivirus et al have very old legacy virii definitions in their databases. It's very unlikely you'll encounter some 1985 boot sector D

Re: [clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Jay Swackhamer
Nathan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > little under 8000 virus's it scans for vs the 65000 virus's Norton is > currently scanning for. Keep in mind that Norton Antivirus et al have very old legacy virii definitions in their databases. It's very unlikely you'll encounter some 1985 boot sector D

Re: [clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Ken McKittrick
Hello I'm using it for simple virus scanning on a 25K user isp. My tests show that ClamAV catches about 99.9% of the viruses that pass though it. Mostly Klez and variants. Sincerely Ken McKittrick Network Engineer USADatanet On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 12:26 PM, Nathan Miller wrote: >

[clamav-users] Introduction

2002-12-11 Thread Nathan Miller
Good morning all. Just shooting an introduction email out here. I've only seen 1 post in the past 2 days since I added myself to the list. I'm curious how many are in the list. I am testing out clamav for incoming email attachment scanning at this point and may put it into production at some

[clamav-users] Opaserv worm

2002-12-11 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Anyone has clamav trapping Opaserv ??? -Wash -- Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The box said 'Requires Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,' Tel: +254 2 313985-9 +254 2 313922 so I installed FreeBSD." GSM: +254 72 743223 +254 733 744