On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:06, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Please check freshclam from the 0.24 version and please let us know
> if it works properly.
No I get the same errors with 0.24. ALthough maybe less frequently. However
0.24 only has to download one file right? WHereas 0.51 downloads both db
files.
On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 8:09 pm, Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld wrote:
> Furthermore, it seems not to recognize email with BugBear, that it
> erlier knew, which I think is incorrect behaviour.
On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 6:32 pm, Chris Hastie wrote:
> Or perhaps if the server returned a
> suitable header about not caching it it would help, eg
>
> Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate
> Pragma: no-cache
It would be a mistake to put that in.
What values do you have for these environment
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Or perhaps if the server returned a suitable header about not caching
>it it would help, eg
>
>Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate
>Pragma: no-cache
Sorry to follow up to my own posting, but I dug a little deeper on this.
It seem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
In short:
On debian testing, upgrading to latest clamav, and removing oav-update and
scannerdaemon made clamscan recognize fewer viruses, apparently. How can that
be? Furthermore, it seems not to recognize email with BugBear, that it erlier
knew
Hi
I've had this problem a couple of times now. I suffer from being behind
a transparent HTTP proxy that intercepts all traffic on port 80. It's
well known amongst ntl: users that it's crap and doesn't refresh as
often as it should.
The problem I'm having is that I can see that the virus datab
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 05:20, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 12:45 am, Iain wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I find that running freshclam fails roughly 9 out of 10 times with errors
> >
> > Do you have a direct connection or are you going through an HTTP proxy?
> >
>
> Direct connectio
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 05:20, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 12:45 am, Iain wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I find that running freshclam fails roughly 9 out of 10 times with errors
>
> Do you have a direct connection or are you going through an HTTP proxy?
>
Direct connection - no proxy
> -Nig
On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 12:45 am, Iain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I find that running freshclam fails roughly 9 out of 10 times with errors
Do you have a direct connection or are you going through an HTTP proxy?
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Conductor, Typesetter.
Owner of the brass band gr
Yeah . But it still shows the output of all the excluded and empty file.
I do not want that to happen
-Original Message-
From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] RE: [users] Report file
See this
See this:
>>..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] temp]# clamscan -r --exclude /temp/t1
/root/temp/t1/t1file: Excluded.
/root/temp/t2/t2file: Empty file.
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 7233
Scanned directories: 3
Scanned files: 0
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 0.00 M
Allright. Thank You so much~
-Original Message-
From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [users] Report file
Use the --exclude parameter
B.
At 10:59 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>is
>there a way to dis
12 matches
Mail list logo
