> GiM,您好！
>
> your said "Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
> creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable." YOU COULD
> NOT PROOF IT.
> The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match
> signature could use standar c or c++.
I strongly suggest t
GiM,您好！
I think you not to understand my mean.
your said "Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable." YOU COULD NOT PROOF
IT.
The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match signature could
use standa
BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote:
> Brian A. Reiter!
>
> if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
> anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the
> engine convenience.
>
>
I don't think you u
Brian A. Reiter!
if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the engine
convenience.
=== 2006-04-01 08:07:53 您在来信中写道：===
>X-Gmail-Received: 7fb57286f11b0f23703c9d0c4a2d27a4c38d3b0
Brian A. Reiter
If you could compile clamav at Win32, it maybe have little fix to src. So
now, it has a module Clamav-win32. My mean, it has not must. You could
maintenance ONE src. Not to have the module of Clamav-win32. If want to use in
Win32. Only compile it. Now we have use in win32, we m
Tomasz Kojm,您好！
but in fact, engine is pure. Most of commercial AV has Linux and Win32
version. so...
the engine could be design the independ OS, why don't you code that?
i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE
ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why do
