Renato Botelho wrote:
> I've waited over 40 minutes, sending a -TERM each 2 seconds and it
> didn't die
Please open a full bug report and detail the steps needed to reproduce
the issue.
Thanks,
aCaB
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Pl
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:52 AM, aCaB wrote:
> Renato Botelho wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> When I was updating clamav-devel in FreeBSD ports collection
>> I noted clamav-milter has no more paramaters like it had in the
>> past, so, i started to work on port to install a default conf file.
>>
>> Ok
Renato Botelho wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> When I was updating clamav-devel in FreeBSD ports collection
> I noted clamav-milter has no more paramaters like it had in the
> past, so, i started to work on port to install a default conf file.
>
> Ok, i did it but i'm having a problem now, the startup s
Ernest Wypierowski wrote:
Good morning,
I find something incomprehensible in clamav-milter.c code. When clamav-
milter daemon do the scanning work itself after getting the first
SIGUSR2 it installs a new signal handler, SIGHUP:
I noticed that too, 1 hour ago, and have already committed
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Nigel Horne wrote:
; Michael Schaap wrote:
; > My guess is that {rcpt_addr} is used instead of argv[0] because of whitelist
; > checking.
;
; No, it was changed because users wanted it to be changed.
Of course, with that code, users have the option of configuring sendmail
not
Michael Schaap wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that virus notifications sent by clamav-milter only contain
the recipient's username, and not the full email address.
This is rather unfortunate, since this makes it hard to figure out which
email address has been compromised, if you have multiple aliases /
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:21:33AM +, Stephen Gran said:
> Hello all,
>
> In clamav-milter.c, I see:
I've changed the subject a bit to try to catch Nigel's attention. Sorry
about following up to myself.
--
--
| Stephe
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:08:01 +0100
> Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please only send patches against the latest code. This patch is
> not needed
> > against the version in CVS and hasn't been for some time.
>
> Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. Sorry that I dod not see this
> cha
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:08:01 +0100
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please only send patches against the latest code. This patch is not needed
> against the version in CVS and hasn't been for some time.
Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. Sorry that I dod not see this
change in the newly
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:08:01 +0100
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please only send patches against the latest code. This patch is not needed
> against the version in CVS and hasn't been for some time.
Oh, I see. Sorry I did not check the CVS log. Thank you for your
reply.
--
Best
imacat wrote:
Dear all,
Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I'm running clamav-milter ClamAV
0.88.5 on my Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r3 Kernel 2.6.16.14.
Please only send patches against the latest code. This patch is not needed
against the version in CVS and hasn't been for some time.
-Nigel
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:40:56PM -0400, John Kelly wrote:
> >> At startup, clamav-milter memory usage is approx. 11m resident and 30m
> >> virtual. But when freshclam loads a new database, memory jumps to 20m
> >> resident and 40m virtual.
>
> > I am seeing the same behaviour on clamd cross-comp
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:49:27PM -0400, John Kelly wrote:
> At startup, clamav-milter memory usage is approx. 11m resident and 30m
> virtual. But when freshclam loads a new database, memory jumps to 20m
> resident and 40m virtual.
>
> The changelog for 0.86 says clamav-milter scans the old datab
On Thursday 30 March 2006 15:34, Nigel Horne wrote:
> smfi_setdbg(6);
It was necessary to tell me, that
[49156] cur 0 new 1 nextmask 2
[49156] got cmd 'D' len 148
[49156] cur 1 new nextmask 2004
[49156] got cmd 'C' len 42
[49156] cur 1 new 2 nextmask 2004
[49156] got cmd 'D' le
On Thursday 30 March 2006 15:34, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Can You prompt where this file is written? I have found only
> > "static void logger (const char *mess)" but this function is
> > caused only in case of non external mode...
>
> if(cfgopt(copt, "LogVerbose")->enabled) {
> logVerbose
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:04:33PM +0500, Sergey wrote:
> On Thursday 30 March 2006 14:30, Sergey wrote:
>
> > > It is so big because you haven't followed my instruction to disable
> > > LogVersbose.
> >
> > I can't disable LogVersbose because I need of verbose syslog.
>
> Can You prompt where
On Thursday 30 March 2006 14:30, Sergey wrote:
> > It is so big because you haven't followed my instruction to disable
> > LogVersbose.
>
> I can't disable LogVersbose because I need of verbose syslog.
Can You prompt where this file is written? I have found only
"static void logger (const char
On Thursday 30 March 2006 14:04, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Why is size of log more 5M ? I removed clamav-milter.log some minutes ago.
> > And clamav-milter is crashing if log size is 2Gb.
>
> It is so big because you haven't followed my instruction to disable
> LogVersbose.
I can't disable LogVer
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 01:50:06PM +0500, Sergey wrote:
> On Friday 13 January 2006 23:05, Nigel Horne wrote:
>
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Which component of clamav-milter write to log
> > >
> > > [49156] cur 0 new 1 nextmask 2
> > > [49156] got cmd 'D' len 148
> > > [49156] cur 1 new nex
On Friday 13 January 2006 23:05, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Which component of clamav-milter write to log
> >
> > [49156] cur 0 new 1 nextmask 2
> > [49156] got cmd 'D' len 148
> > [49156] cur 1 new nextmask 2004
> > [49156] got cmd 'C' len 42
> > [49156] cur 1 new 2 nextmask
On Friday 13 January 2006 23:05, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:06 +0400, Sergey wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Which component of clamav-milter write to log
> >
> > [49156] cur 0 new 1 nextmask 2
> > [49156] got cmd 'D' len 148
> > [49156] cur 1 new nextmask 2004
> > [49156] g
On Friday 13 January 2006 23:05, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > [49156] got cmd 'C' len 42
> > [49156] cur 1 new 2 nextmask 2004
> > [49156] got cmd 'D' len 1
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I wish to forbid it, but I can not understand, how. :-(
>
> Disable LogVerbose in clamd.conf
What do you think about adding t
On Saturday 28 January 2006 13:44, Nigel Horne wrote:
> >And it seems to me, that clamav-milter it is necessary to allocate in the
> >separate project as it is absolutely not obligatory to change clamav-milter
> >and clamd simultaneously.
> Does --config-file not work?
It's work. But parameter
Sergey wrote:
What do you think about adding clamav-milter.conf in package ?
Some parameters for clamd and clamav-milter should not be identical.
And it seems to me, that clamav-milter it is necessary to allocate in the
separate project as it is absolutely not obligatory to change clamav-milt
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:07, Sergey wrote:
> > Disable LogVerbose in clamd.conf
>
> It's not good... :-(
>
> First, that is badly that does not exist default config for clamav-milter
> (there is still a problem with the common log file).
What do you think about adding clamav-milter.con
On Friday 13 January 2006 23:05, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > I wish to forbid it, but I can not understand, how. :-(
>
> Disable LogVerbose in clamd.conf
It's not good... :-(
First, that is badly that does not exist default config for clamav-milter
(there is still a problem with the common log file
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:06 +0400, Sergey wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Which component of clamav-milter write to log
>
> [49156] cur 0 new 1 nextmask 2
> [49156] got cmd 'D' len 148
> [49156] cur 1 new nextmask 2004
> [49156] got cmd 'C' len 42
> [49156] cur 1 new 2 nextmask 2004
> [49156] got cm
"Nigel Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why does the order of headers matter?
Because of things like Domain Keys which (amongst other things) sign the
headers (below the one it adds). If other packages add to the headers below
the Domain Keys 'signature' between the message being signed and t
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Why does the order of headers matter?
Two reasons - one practical, one theoretical.
Practical:
When I'm looking at the headers of an email I received, it's nice to be able to
easily distinguish the ones that were added by my mail servers (the top ones)
from the ones that we
Why does the order of headers matter?
-Nigel
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 23:36, Brian J. France wrote:
> Any reason this was removed?
Yes. It is true that I forgot the dropped privilege issue (now fixed and
ready to be committed), but there was a reason for removing it.
> Brian
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Bar
tisdag 22 februari 2005 14.06 skrev Tomasz Kojm:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:53:01 +0100
>
> Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It doesn't even work if I set the TEMP env var to point
> > to /var/lib/clamav/tmp.
>
> libclamav uses TMPDIR and not TEMP
Ahh, of course. Maybe I shouldn't have b
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:53:01 +0100
Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't even work if I set the TEMP env var to point
> to /var/lib/clamav/tmp.
libclamav uses TMPDIR and not TEMP
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamA
Nigel Horne wrote:
Your patch is out of date. Patches must be against the version in CVS.
A fix for this was committed to CVS days ago.
Thanks Nigel. If I write any other patches I'll do it against CVS, I
don't know why I forgot about that, sorry...
schu
Your patch is out of date. Patches must be against the version in CVS.
A fix for this was committed to CVS days ago.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
___
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> currenty I'm trying to hack this whitelist feature into the
> clamAV-milter. I hope that the tests will be finished by the end of
> next week.
>
> Right now following features are implemented
> * reading from a whitelist-file
>
> Is it possible to send the clamav-milter template in HTML format?
If sending HTML email you need to include HTML header tag in your
template like this:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd";>
[Virus Detected]
...
brynn :-)
_
> Is it possible to send the clamav-milter template in HTML format?
I'm not a coder so what I did will probably make you puke but I now have
clamav-milter sending out HTML emails. Here's what I did:
On line 2666 of clamav-milter/clamav-milter.c add this:
/* added by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to make em
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 at 22:36:47 +1300, Brynn Neilson wrote:
>
> I have clamd and clamav-milter working sweet now. Is it possible to
> send the clamav-milter template in HTML format? I looked on Google for
> something to do with Milter changing the headers to Content-type:
> text/html; charset=is
On Thursday 06 Jan 2005 09:36, Brynn Neilson wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I have clamd and clamav-milter working sweet now. Is it possible to
> send the clamav-milter template in HTML format?
I have no plans for generating emails in HTML format.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
On Monday 09 August 2004 21:11, Sergey wrote:
> I'm understand. Well. But it's limit of template functionality. I think what
> is time for change syntax (may be it's not good because it's only for milter)
> or create third class of variables - clamav-milter specific. So, you select
> %X - for Cl
On Friday 06 August 2004 16:28, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > 1. You are leave one % before clamav variables. It isn't multipurpose:
> > you can't create variables more one symbol in this case.
>
> I have no plans to make the syntax of clamav-milter incompatible with clamd
> (see VirusEvent).
I'm under
On Friday 06 Aug 2004 11:58, Sergey wrote:
> I was downloaded new CVS and I think that some code isn't good.
>
> 1. You are leave one % before clamav variables. It isn't multipurpose:
> you can't create variables more one symbol in this case.
I have no plans to make the syntax of clamav-milter i
On Sunday 01 August 2004 12:57, Nigel Horne wrote:
> I am in the throws of rewriting this code,
I was downloaded new CVS and I think that some code isn't good.
1. You are leave one % before clamav variables. It isn't multipurpose:
you can't create variables more one symbol in this case.
2. You
> For Nigel Horne:
> If you decide add it to CVS, please use this links. It's more
> recent than I sent to you yesterday.
Thanks for this, as I already indicated to both the clamav-users list
and to you privately I am in the throws of rewriting this code, so I
will happily incorporate any ideas in
Joe Maimon wrote:
I see in CVS we are now tracking number of bytes written to clamd
socket. It would probaly be a whole lot easier (and more accurate) if
clamfi_send actualy returned number of bytes written or -1 on error.
Additionaly clamfi_send can potentialy write less than the user
expec
On Thursday 01 April 2004 03:39, Antony Stone wrote:
> All your suggestions assume that ClamAV is running in combination with
> sendmail
Yes. I write in subject: "clamav-milter". It's all only for it.
> This is not a safe assumption. People use ClamAV with all sorts of different
> MTAs - pro
On 2004-03-31, Antony Stone wrote:
>On Wednesday 31 March 2004 10:33 pm, Sergey wrote:
>
>> I think produce to discussion some patch.
>
>All your suggestions assume that ClamAV is running in combination with
>sendmail (and, perhaps, combined in a very particular way).
A quick look into his patch
Antony Stone wrote:
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 10:33 pm, Sergey wrote:
Hello.
I think produce to discussion some patch.
All your suggestions assume that ClamAV is running in combination with
sendmail (and, perhaps, combined in a very particular way).
which is generaly a valid assu
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 10:33 pm, Sergey wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I think produce to discussion some patch.
All your suggestions assume that ClamAV is running in combination with
sendmail (and, perhaps, combined in a very particular way).
This is not a safe assumption. People use ClamAV with al
On Wednesday 31 Mar 2004 9:30 pm, Joe Maimon wrote:
> I saw the below patch in cvs. I just want to point out that I dont think
> will work.
Thanks for this. I will keep it until 0.70 is out, I am working on that at the moment.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Ba
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Thursday, October 9, 2003, at 11:31 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
> >> Why isn't 0.60f available on SourceForge?
> >
> > Because it's in the development tree not the release tree (remember
> > this is the developer's mailing list, not the user's mailing list)
On Thursday, October 9, 2003, at 11:31 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
Why isn't 0.60f available on SourceForge?
Because it's in the development tree not the release tree (remember
this is the
developer's mailing list, not the user's mailing list).
On the vpopmail and qmailadmin projects, we have separate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 Oct 2003 10:28 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
> Why isn't 0.60f available on SourceForge?
Because it's in the development tree not the release tree (remember this is the
developer's mailing list, not the user's mailing list).
> SourceForge i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 Oct 2003 10:28 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
> Is 0.60f newer than October 1st?
No.
- -Nigel
- --
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
-BEGIN P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 Oct 2003 7:35 pm, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> Perhaps it would be reasonable to release a new version of clamav if there
> are indeed a significant number of stability fixes since 0.60. Telling
> people to use CVS snapshots only works for
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:35:28 -0400 (EDT)
Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Nigel Horne wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 02 Oct 2003 9:13 pm, Joe Talbott wrote:
> > > Here is a patch for clamav-milter.c that fixes forking a daemon on
> > > Debian,
> >
> > This patch has not be
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 11:09 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
This patch has not been relevant since version 0.60f. I would strongly
advise you
all to check with code's authors before undertaking work, the number
of times I see people
re-inventing the wheel is depressingly large.
Why isn't 0.60
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Thursday 02 Oct 2003 9:13 pm, Joe Talbott wrote:
> > Here is a patch for clamav-milter.c that fixes forking a daemon on
> > Debian,
>
> This patch has not been relevant since version 0.60f. I would strongly advise you
> all to check with code's authors b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 02 Oct 2003 9:13 pm, Joe Talbott wrote:
> I'm still seeing instability in clamd and clamav-milter. I get
> segmentation faults if I run clamav-devel-20031001 without
> --max-children with MaxThreads set in clamav.conf. I'll keep the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 02 Oct 2003 9:13 pm, Joe Talbott wrote:
> Here is a patch for clamav-milter.c that fixes forking a daemon on
> Debian,
This patch has not been relevant since version 0.60f. I would strongly advise you
all to check with code's authors befor
61 matches
Mail list logo
