On Jul 30, 2005, at 03:25 PM, Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jul 30, 2005, at 07:23 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:31:52 -0700
James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
Dale W
On Jul 30, 2005, at 07:23 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:31:52 -0700
James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've already linked
On Jul 30, 2005, at 07:23 AM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:31:52 -0700
James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've already linked a
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:31:52 -0700
James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dale Walsh wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
> >> Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I've already linked against 0.13.38 and it
On Jul 29, 2005, at 06:31 PM, James Paige wrote:
Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've already linked against 0.13.38 and it doesn't appear to
have any
ill effects on libclamav s
Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've already linked against 0.13.38 and it doesn't appear to have any
ill effects on libclamav so maybe what is in 0.13.38 is compatible
with the fixes
On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've already linked against 0.13.38 and it doesn't appear to have any
ill effects on libclamav so maybe what is in 0.13.38 is compatible
with the fixes you implemented in
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've already linked against 0.13.38 and it doesn't appear to have any
> ill effects on libclamav so maybe what is in 0.13.38 is compatible
> with the fixes you implemented in 0.10.27.
No, it isn't. Please read the sour
On Jul 29, 2005, at 03:55 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:06:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to build ClamAV using an installed zziplib because
there are issues with the supplied zziplib code.
What issues?
Can the code be changed to support
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:06:57 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to build ClamAV using an installed zziplib because
> there are issues with the supplied zziplib code.
What issues?
> Can the code be changed to support an external zziplib?
No, libclamav should not be
I've been trying to build ClamAV using an installed zziplib because
there are issues with the supplied zziplib code.
While this sounds like a simple task, it continues to build and use
the supplied zziplib code.
symbol ___zzip_get16 used from dynamic library /usr/local/lib/
libclamav.dylib
11 matches
Mail list logo