Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-users] problems after .84 upgrade

2005-05-11 Thread Jef Poskanzer
>You haven't notified the clamd that is running about your latest virus >database. I just started clamd. Are you saying it needs to be notified right after it starts? --- Jef Jef Poskanzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acme.com/jef/ ___ http

Re: [Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-users] problems after .84 upgrade

2005-05-11 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:41, Jef Poskanzer wrote: > >I'm about to try turning --external back on to see if it fixes my problem > >with clamav-milter calling messages clean while clamscan says the same > >messages contain Bagz.something. You haven't notified the clamd that is running about your

[Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-users] problems after .84 upgrade

2005-05-11 Thread Jef Poskanzer
>I'm about to try turning --external back on to see if it fixes my problem >with clamav-milter calling messages clean while clamscan says the same >messages contain Bagz.something. By the way, this didn't fix it. I'm still getting clamav-milter saying messages are clean while clamscan (correctly)

[Clamav-devel] Re: [Clamav-users] problems after .84 upgrade

2005-05-11 Thread Jef Poskanzer
I wonder if I could get a clarification of the following message from the -users mailing list? Nigel seems to be saying that telling clamav-milter to use clamd via --external doesn't use IPC and is faster than using the milter's built-in scanner. I would guess the reverse to be true. From: N