On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:17:36 -0700
Tony Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had other ideas. Way back, when there were new encrypted zip files,
> I thought it would be easy to detect them without being able to or
> needing to unzip them by just by looking at the file length and the
> CRC32. D
On 6/10/05, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use the SCAN command of clamd. You can modify clamdscan to use SCAN
> instead of CONTSCAN.
Woops, sorry my mistake then. My particular application is for a
scanning rather large files that are infrequently uploaded (a couple a
day, max). Becau
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:52:11 -0700
Tony Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if it will mean less work and be quicker/less intensive,
> but I think an option to stop scanning on --first virus found --fast
> might be benificial. clamav would stop scanning once it found one
> infection/
I don't know if it will mean less work and be quicker/less intensive,
but I think an option to stop scanning on --first virus found --fast
might be benificial. clamav would stop scanning once it found one
infection/the first signs of infection.
I see situations when a script is scanning 100 files