On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:01:15 + (GMT)
Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> ; On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:08:51 + (GMT)
> ; Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ;
> ; > Does anyone know if this patch has been considered? I haven't heard
> ;
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
; On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:08:51 + (GMT)
; Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
;
; > Does anyone know if this patch has been considered? I haven't heard
; > anything since I submitted it.
;
; There must be some telepathy going on here, because I'm imp
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:38:15 + (GMT)
Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Somehow I managed to send only part of the patch in. The changes to
> remote_cvdhead() also need making to get_database(), both do a web request
> using a User-Agent header.
Indeed, updated in CVS.
--
oo.
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
; On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:11:19 +0100
; Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
;
; > On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:08:51 + (GMT)
; > Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
; >
; > > Does anyone know if this patch has been considered? I haven't heard
; > > any
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:11:19 +0100
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:08:51 + (GMT)
> Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know if this patch has been considered? I haven't heard
> > anything since I submitted it.
>
> There must be some tele
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
; On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:08:51 + (GMT)
; Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
;
; > Does anyone know if this patch has been considered? I haven't heard
; > anything since I submitted it.
;
; There must be some telepathy going on here, because I'm im
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:08:51 + (GMT)
Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know if this patch has been considered? I haven't heard
> anything since I submitted it.
There must be some telepathy going on here, because I'm implementing
it right now.
--
oo. T
lamav-devel@lists.clamav.net
Subject: [Clamav-devel] Freshclam User-Agent header
By default, freshclam uses a User-Agent header of PACKAGE/VERSION
(e.g. clamav/0.87.1) when downloading virus updates over HTTP. This makes
it a little awkward if your servers are behind a firewall/proxy which
applies User-Agen
By default, freshclam uses a User-Agent header of PACKAGE/VERSION
(e.g. clamav/0.87.1) when downloading virus updates over HTTP. This makes
it a little awkward if your servers are behind a firewall/proxy which
applies User-Agent filtering.
The attached patch adds a new freshclam option (HTTPUserA
