Re: [c-nsp] TIL: Maintenance Operations Protocol (MOP)

2022-04-13 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Drew Weaver wrote on 05/08/2021 19:20: Yes, in my research I noticed that OS image age has nothing to do with it. Newer images with different trains have it enabled, older images in totally other trains as well. Also even though it appears to emulate VTY simply configuring

Re: [c-nsp] MTU and PMTUD

2022-12-08 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Marcin Kurek via cisco-nsp wrote on 08/12/2022 09:25: Interesting, but why would 'sh run' or 'write' raise an interrupt? Isn't this a branch in code that handles the CLI? this was monolithic IOS running on older platforms. On a non-preemptive multitasking operating system like this, interrupts

Re: [c-nsp] Internet border router recommendations and experiences

2023-02-22 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Eric Louie via cisco-nsp wrote on 22/02/2023 18:29: Mark, thanks. We were quoted a MX304 for the Internet edge from Juniper. How has your experience been with it? are you 10G upstream and downstream? Any IPS on the 10G connection? Eric, you're mixing up DFZ routing capability with traffic i

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR filter route from OSPF?

2023-11-28 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote on 15/11/2023 17:43: Is there a way to prevent that IP address from being seen at all by the IOS XR routers? prefix filtering is a defining feature of a policy routing protocol. OSPF is a link-state protocol, and doesn't support the concept of having different

Re: [c-nsp] Support for CFP2

2024-01-19 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote on 19/01/2024 14:35: At $dayjob we're working on turning up a 100G connection with a provider. At this point, it looks like the only optic that's meets their criteria is a CFP2. sounds like metro 100G connectivity. What sort of distances are involved, and is there a

Re: [c-nsp] Support for CFP2

2024-01-19 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote on 19/01/2024 14:58: The pluggable optic must be DWDM 1530 to 1563 nm with QPSK modulation that fits 50Ghz (~31 to 35Gbaud) and a launch power of ZR+ 0dBm. The customer channel should have Rx: Max <-10 dBm/Ch and Tx: Min: >–5 dBm/Ch to Max: <+ 6.5dBm/Ch in order to mee

Re: [c-nsp] Acceptable port configurations for ASR 9902 (gripe)

2024-01-31 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote on 31/01/2024 14:00: So having a 1x100GE,1x100GE,4x25GE,10x10GE option and not a 1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE,10x10GE option is just... laziness I guess is how I would describe it. 4x25G is not the same as 1x100G - sounds like there's some weird gearbox stuff going on

Re: [c-nsp] Acceptable port configurations for ASR 9902 (gripe)

2024-01-31 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Drew Weaver wrote on 31/01/2024 14:12: I know it is not the same but if it can do 1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE it would sort of follow that it can do 1x100GE,1x100GE,1x100GE,10x10GE tbh this will depend on the hardware and how the gearboxes are set up. For example if you had a single ASIC/N

Re: [c-nsp] [External] Re: Support for CFP2

2024-02-02 Thread Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp
Rob Evans via cisco-nsp wrote on 24/01/2024 23:27: Yeah, as I mentioned, there may be alternatives. Noting that the OP wanted a range of 800km+, do SO also offer a suitable pluggable for the line-side? The ones I could see from a cursory glance appear to be dispersion limited to 450km at 50GHz,