--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,I need community feedback about carving a virtual router instance out of
Cat4507r+e Sup7-e. Let me explain. I have a pair of said Cat4507 running as
distribution switches. I need to add two new routers to terminate MPLS VPN
connection. Currently this connection termi
--- Begin Message ---
Not sure whether this is helping or not Rick, but I have used Dimension Data
maintenance before. They would sell you a straight SmartNet contract or their
own in-house maintenance, which might or might not be backed by Cisco. I bought
the former for less common equipment li
--- Begin Message ---
I have been buying this kind of service from Dimension Data. It was half the
price of Cisco's offering. However, it was fully backed by a real Cisco
contract so there was no issue with getting support trough TAC or with software
updates.
-- ek
From: Charles Sprickman
--- Begin Message ---
Hi there,Can someone please confirm whether it is possible to create a
port-channel trunk from MACsec encrypted ports on 4507R+E Sup 7-E or 8-E uplink
ports and/or on any optical linecards (WS-X4712-SFP+E, WS-X4724-SFP-E)?Do any
other switches support this MACsec/EtherChann
--- Begin Message ---
Hi everybody,
Need your opinion on choosing a switch for an upgrade. I got a bunch of cat4507
sup7-e running right now thatneed to be replaced very soon. I can’tseem to
pick the right platform to replace it with. Cisco is being as confusing as
always.
My requirements are
.
Thanks,
Eli
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eli Kagan via cisco-nsp
To: Cisco Network Service Providers
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 22:51:07 + (UTC)
Subject: [c-nsp] choosing a switch cat6500 vs cat6800
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
I have a rather old Cat4507R+E pair, running on four Sup7e as a VSS, IOS-XE
version 3.8.8E.
I'd like to understand what's the right way of doing an ISSU on a quad sup
system. I am planing to go to version 3.8.10E unless someone has a better
suggestion.
Sharing y
h only duals vs quads.
Obviously out-of-band management on all supervisors is a necessity.
YMMV, good luck!
-Garrett
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:27 PM Eli Kagan via cisco-nsp
wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Eli Kagan
> To: "cisco-nsp@puck.
patches. We
are currently looking at simply replacing them with Catalyst 9k models.
The 4500-Xs run the same supervisor set and are just as friendly, although
contending with only duals vs quads.
Obviously out-of-band management on all supervisors is a necessity.
YMMV, good luck!
-Garrett
On Fri, Mar 1
Hi Hank,I had similar experience with Cisco TAC in the past. I managed to
escalate it via my Cisco account rep. That landed the case on the desk of
someone who actually knows a thing or two and we were able to at least have an
intelligent conversation about the issue.
Realistically though, I u
10 matches
Mail list logo
