Re: [Cherokee] Issue 949 in cherokee: Admin Interface Buttons not Working

2010-08-23 Thread C. Mundi
Hurray!! Thank you! On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:48 AM, wrote: > Updates: >Status: Fixed > > Comment #5 on issue 949 by alobbs: Admin Interface Buttons not Working > http://code.google.com/p/cherokee/issues/detail?id=949 > > > (No comment was entered for this change.) > > -- > You receive

Re: [Cherokee] mod-geoip

2010-08-08 Thread C. Mundi
Thank you for your kind reply. I failed to fully appreciate the significance of your announcement when I saw it. I am using the i-tse PPA now. I see all the modules are current. Thank you very much! Carlos On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Leonel Nunez wrote: > > Since 1.0.6 the PPA archive

Re: [Cherokee] Case-insensitive vhost match

2010-08-08 Thread C. Mundi
Thanks for the pointer! On 8/8/10, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 08/08/2010, at 16:11, C. Mundi wrote: > >> I missed that in the docs too. Where is it? I suspect the same >> section has more information I should know. :) > > It is on PCRE's documentation

Re: [Cherokee] Case-insensitive vhost match

2010-08-08 Thread C. Mundi
I missed that in the docs too. Where is it? I suspect the same section has more information I should know. :) On 8/8/10, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 07/08/2010, at 22:47, Peter-Paul van Gemerden wrote: > >> I was wondering whether it's possible to have case-insensitive host >> matching. I

Re: [Cherokee] mod-geoip

2010-08-07 Thread C. Mundi
1.0.4-1. So... On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:03 PM, C. Mundi wrote: > > The mod-geoip package in the ubuntu PPA apparently requires an *exact* > match for the cherokee server. > Is this restriction needed? Are there plans to push an updated mod-geoip > to PPA? Meanwhile, is there

[Cherokee] mod-geoip

2010-08-07 Thread C. Mundi
The mod-geoip package in the ubuntu PPA apparently requires an *exact* match for the cherokee server. Is this restriction needed? Are there plans to push an updated mod-geoip to PPA? Meanwhile, is there a newer mod-geoip we should be using? Thanks! cm # apt-get install libcherokee-mod-geoip Re

Re: [Cherokee] Gzip and Deflate Question

2010-08-06 Thread C. Mundi
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 06/08/2010, at 05:21, C. Mundi wrote: > > > So... The nonfinal forbid trumps the default allow in the case of > > a.php...is that because of the order? Or because default is weaker > > than patterns? > &

Re: [Cherokee] Test Suite Failure

2010-08-06 Thread C. Mundi
Suhosin is pretty strict. If you're running a site with pretty URLs (like a WordPress blog) you'll probably find that you have to increase things like suhosin.get.max_name_length suhosin.request.max_totalname_length just to get your site to work. Secure-by-default is a good thing, but it can pla

Re: [Cherokee] Gzip and Deflate Question

2010-08-05 Thread C. Mundi
So... The nonfinal forbid trumps the default allow in the case of a.php...is that because of the order? Or because default is weaker than patterns? On 8/5/10, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 05/08/2010, at 23:57, Stefan de Konink wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Richard Owen wrote: >> >>> What is

Re: [Cherokee] fail2ban setup for Cherokee

2010-08-01 Thread C. Mundi
Vladimir... Good point! Thanks! Kyle On 8/1/10, Vladimir Smagin <2...@blindage.org> wrote: > fail2ban scanning apache's logs for bruteforce attempts. cherokee's logs > compatible with apache. > > On Вск, 2010-08-01 at 11:36 -0700, C. Mundi wrote: >> >>

[Cherokee] fail2ban setup for Cherokee

2010-08-01 Thread C. Mundi
Hi, Is anyone here using fail2ban filters and actions with Cherokee, and would you be willing to share any of them? I finally got tired of managing iptables directly and am giving fail2ban a try. Naturally, it ships with Apache examples but none for Cherokee. :( Thanks, CM

Re: [Cherokee] Restart after reboot on Ubuntu 10.4?

2010-07-25 Thread C. Mundi
If cherokee is not starting on boot it probably isn't reacting correctly to changes in runlevels either. Check your /etc/rc* directories and make sure you see symlinks to /etc/init.d/cherokee script. If not then the update-rc command (hope I spelled that right) can save you the trouble of creatin

Re: [Cherokee] Anyone deploying Wordpress?

2010-07-25 Thread C. Mundi
:05 PM, C. Mundi wrote: > Hi. > > I'm interested to hear from anyone who has deployed wordpress on cherokee. > I have set up a trial system: > > ubuntu10 x64 VPS with sub-40ms pings from my browser > cherokee 1.05 > mysql 5.1.37 > php 5.2.10 with CGI/FastCGI and

Re: [Cherokee] Anyone deploying Wordpress?

2010-07-25 Thread C. Mundi
> worked fine. All of mine are individual standalone WP installs for various > clients. > > I do plan on trying out the multisite soon though on Cherokee. I'll let you > know if I encounter anything. > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:16 AM, C. Mundi wrote: > >> Denni

Re: [Cherokee] Anyone deploying Wordpress?

2010-07-24 Thread C. Mundi
to Cherokee, seems to work much better with different > servers other than Apache. Doubt that's the problems though. Good luck. > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:27 PM, C. Mundi wrote: > >> >> Updates: >> >> I'm pretty sure I am dealing with a WP issue, u

Re: [Cherokee] v1.0.5 ssl and zertificate

2010-07-24 Thread C. Mundi
This is much appreciated. I just switched from building from sources to the PPA. It's a huge step forward. Carlos On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Leonel Nunez wrote: > > > Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:59:27AM +0200]: > >> On 23/07/2010, at 00:22, Yann Malet wrote: > >>

Re: [Cherokee] Anyone deploying Wordpress?

2010-07-24 Thread C. Mundi
n Ubuntu 10.04 Server 32 bit running the latest PHP/MySQL for that > distro. Everything installed via apt. > > Just my $0.02 USD. :-) > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM, C. Mundi wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I'm interested to hear from anyone who has deployed w

Re: [Cherokee] Anyone deploying Wordpress?

2010-07-24 Thread C. Mundi
mory which the fcgi is requesting! It is interesting to note that 268435456 = 0x1000 = 256 MB which seems a little suspicious to me since phpinfo() is correctly reporting that it is reading memory_limit=64M from the /etc/php5/cgi/php.ini file. If I dig into the stock wp-admin.php, I find this a

[Cherokee] Anyone deploying Wordpress?

2010-07-24 Thread C. Mundi
Hi. I'm interested to hear from anyone who has deployed wordpress on cherokee. I have set up a trial system: ubuntu10 x64 VPS with sub-40ms pings from my browser cherokee 1.05 mysql 5.1.37 php 5.2.10 with CGI/FastCGI and memory_limit=64M wordpress 3.0 This is a single instance of wordpress, embe

Re: [Cherokee] v1.0.5 ssl and zertificate

2010-07-12 Thread C. Mundi
Exactly. If enough people feel strongly about this, then an able hero will volunteer to maintain a "stable" branch with backports of critical fixes. I have looked at my existing commitments; I don't have time. I do think that the success of cherokee will ultimately depend on having a community c

Re: [Cherokee] Subtle point about indexes?

2010-06-26 Thread C. Mundi
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 25/06/2010, at 23:56, C. Mundi wrote: > > > I just set up a virtual server with the following parameters in the Basic > tab: > > Document Root = /srv/www/mydomain.net/public_html > > Directory Indexes =

[Cherokee] Subtle point about indexes?

2010-06-25 Thread C. Mundi
Do I have this right? I just set up a virtual server with the following parameters in the Basic tab: Document Root = /srv/www/mydomain.net/public_html Directory Indexes = index.html and the following parameters in the Behavior tab: Directory / handled by List&Send with "alternate" Document Roo

Re: [Cherokee] Still problems with Installation !

2010-06-25 Thread C. Mundi
Like you, I don't want to be dependent on prepackaged builds for a fast-moving project like Cherokee. So I'd want to sort out the build. I don;t know why the build wasn't smooth for you, but I can offer one data point: I have a VPS test box running stock Ubuntu 9.10 x64 plus the gcc toolchain. I

Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee & django [problems]

2010-06-24 Thread C. Mundi
2010/6/24 Alvaro Lopez Ortega > On 24/06/2010, at 00:59, C. Mundi wrote: > > On 6/23/10, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > >> On 23/06/2010, at 20:14, Álvaro Pinel Bueno wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, I'm learning cherokee and django, I'm triying to follow the

Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee & django [problems]

2010-06-23 Thread C. Mundi
I suffered the same confusion at first. The context of phrases like "path" and "directory" is important. As with apache...the nomenclature is obvious once you get it and completely nonobvious before then. The difference is there are thousands of books written about apache and so far none for Che

Re: [Cherokee] Release notes?

2010-06-22 Thread C. Mundi
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:02 PM, C. Mundi wrote: > are there release notes on the website? > I see in svn it looks like there was a change about a year ago in how > the changelog is maintained... But I don't see anything newer. > > Thanks > cm > > I did a poor jo

[Cherokee] Release notes?

2010-06-22 Thread C. Mundi
are there release notes on the website? I see in svn it looks like there was a change about a year ago in how the changelog is maintained... But I don't see anything newer. Thanks cm -- Sent from my mobile device ___ Cherokee mailing list Cherokee@list

[Cherokee] 1.0.2+uWSGI+Django

2010-06-20 Thread C. Mundi
Hi. First, I want to say, Cherokee is very cool. It seems like it makes common server configuration as easy as one of those canned CMS frameworks. And the integrated help is very thoughtful. And the build goes so smoothly on both karmic and lucid. Beautiful. I've just replaced Apache2 with Ch