> On Jan 17, 2022, at 21:59, 0dminnimda <0dminni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The phrase “clang api” is a bit vague (libclang?)
>
> If it's possible, then of course LibClang as it's backward compatible, but I
> know that it's restricted in functionality, so if LibClang don't give such
> freedom,
Right now I'm in process of trying this approach:
Copy the code from cc1_main, write my own SourceManager and set it to
CompilerInstance with setSourceManager().
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 7:45 PM Matthew Fernandez
wrote:
>
> > On Jan 17, 2022, at 21:59, 0dminnimda <0dminni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
