On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 10:14, krokus via cfe-users
wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Thanks for the quick response; it gave me some directions to
> investigate further, otherwise it seemed I got stuck trying to make
> sense of many moving pieces in this puzzle. So, my understanding is
> that generally the run
> Can you catch the exception with "catch (...)"?
I tried this route and added such catch-all clause just at the throw
site. Moreover, I put an explicit throw("catch-me") there in hope to
see if it wil just get caught rightaway. Nope, the exception is thrown
properly, but the catch (...) is not in
