Re: [cfe-users] Why does this testcase fail in clang-60?

2018-03-27 Thread Jonas Toth via cfe-users
I believe the default standard did change to c++14. How did you compile? Could you make a case in godbolt.org? Am 27.03.2018 um 04:52 schrieb Yuri via cfe-users: > This testcase: > > # include > # include > > # define _I ((complex_t)(1i)) > typedef std::complex complex_t; > > complex_t f(const

Re: [cfe-users] Why does this testcase fail in clang-60?

2018-03-27 Thread Yuri via cfe-users
On 03/27/18 02:43, Jonas Toth via cfe-users wrote: I believe the default standard did change to c++14. How did you compile? Could you make a case in godbolt.org? I compiled without arguments. Adding -std=c++11 or -std=c++98 doesn't change the error message. Yuri __

Re: [cfe-users] Why does this testcase fail in clang-60?

2018-03-27 Thread Richard via cfe-users
[Please reply *only* to the list and do not include my email directly in the To: or Cc: of your reply; otherwise I will not see your reply. Thanks.] In article , Yuri via cfe-users writes: > On 03/27/18 02:43, Jonas Toth via cfe-users wrote: > > I believe the default standard did change to c