In the latest draft, this is [temp.pre]/10:
"""
A definition of a function template, member function of a class template,
variable template, or static data member of a class template shall be
reachable from the end of every definition domain (6.3) in which it is
implicitly instantiated (13.9.1) un
Yeah, can't seem to divine the concrete wording here either - perhaps
Richard will have a moment to chime in.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 6:10 AM Jaroslav Zeman via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > What happens if you change the order of the .cpp files, putting
> > template.cpp fi
>
> What happens if you change the order of the .cpp files, putting
> template.cpp first; is it stil unresolved?
>
> clang++ -o test template.cpp main.cpp
The order doesn't matter.
> I don't believe this code is valid according to C++. I believe it would
> require an explicit instantiation of t
I don't believe this code is valid according to C++. I believe it would
require an explicit instantiation of the ctor/dtor somewhere to make that
code valid - though I don't have chapter and verse on the spec at hand just
now to back that up.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:54 AM Jaroslav Zeman via cfe-
> $ clang++ -o test main.cpp template.cpp
>
>> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/main-e2fa2c.o: in function `main':
> main.cpp:(.text+0x2f): undefined reference to `Template::Template()'
> /usr/bin/ld: main.cpp:(.text+0x4d): undefined reference to
> `Template::~Template()'
> /usr/bin/ld: main.cpp:(.text+0x82): und
Hello,
I've run into wieird problem when trying to compile and link our programs with
clang++ on linux instead of g++. It occurs, when:
- template class member definitions are separated from the definition of the
class
- no explicit instantiation is done
- member definitions are available only
