Re: [cfe-users] Fwd: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code

2019-05-13 Thread Sudhindra kulkarni via cfe-users
Hi Richard, Thanks for the quick response. I tried the -I- option. I ran the below command clang.exe -E path of cfile.c -I path of dir y -I- With this I get the below error clang.exe:error :-I- not supported , please use -iquote instead. I tried using -iquote as well clang.exe

Re: [cfe-users] Fwd: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code

2019-05-13 Thread Sudhindra kulkarni via cfe-users
Thanks Richard for the answer. I have another question regarding the include(-I) option. If we have a c file called cfile.c and a header file called header.h both in the same directory say (dir x). cfile.c includes header.h as shown below #include "header.h" And if in some other directory say (d

Re: [cfe-users] Fwd: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code

2019-05-10 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-users
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 22:47, Sudhindra kulkarni wrote: > > Thanks Richard for the answer. > > I have another question regarding the include(-I) option. > > If we have a c file called cfile.c and a header file called header.h both in > the same directory say (dir x). cfile.c includes header.h as

Re: [cfe-users] Fwd: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code

2019-05-08 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-users
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 23:09, Sudhindra kulkarni via cfe-users wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Tim Northover" > Date: May 1, 2019 3:48 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code > To: "Sudhindra kulkarni" > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailin

[cfe-users] Fwd: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code

2019-05-08 Thread Sudhindra kulkarni via cfe-users
-- Forwarded message -- From: "Tim Northover" Date: May 1, 2019 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code To: "Sudhindra kulkarni" Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 22:28, Sudhindra kulkarni via llvm-dev wrote: > Is i