Hey Robert,
I can highely recommend `godbolt.org`, it has support for clang-query as
additional tool when you select clang as the compiler as well as AST output.
Additionally: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html
There you get all the possible matchers you can combine. You ca
Hi Milan,
just to be sure:
Are you doing a multi-stage build? On which stage is the warning emitted?
The architecture you are building on itself is ARM or are you doing
cross compilation?
The argument itself is a compatibility-option for GCC, which might be
added after clang-11 was branched?
(h
A patch for the LLVM documentation or at least a link in it to your gist
would be great!
Am 13.02.19 um 20:07 schrieb Croepha via cfe-users:
> I spent some time figuring out how to get Clang and related tools to
> build against musl starting from a GNU libc system. The result is a
> GNU-less (no
Hey Tom,
thank you for reporting this issue!
Tt looks like the check is confusing these overloads somehow. Looking
through the code it could be, that the second version is considered as
placement-overload which are ignored, but that is just a guess.
Are you by any chance compiling with C++17? It
Great to hear!
Am 12.12.18 um 00:11 schrieb Mateusz Loskot via cfe-users:
>> I suspect that is the case indeed.
>>
>> I have created new test in GIL which generates single .cpp file
>> that includes all headers (https://github.com/boostorg/gil/pull/184):
>> I generated compile_commands.json and ma
I am forwarding this to cfe-dev as it might this sounds like a bug and
cfe-users is not read that much.
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:[cfe-users] floor is vectorized, but not sin, cos or exp
Datum: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:47:16 +0100
Von:Klaus Leppkes via cfe-users
Hi Mateusz,
comments inline.
Am 10.12.18 um 22:14 schrieb Mateusz Loskot via cfe-users:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running clang-tidy 7.0 (also tried 5.0) to modernise some aspects
> of Boost.GIL (https://github.com/boostorg/gil) source code.
>
> I've noticed, clang-tidy 7.0 (also 5.0) does not apply fixes fo
The snippet you show is already quite minimal, so its ok to file another
bug specifically for that one.
Am 10.12.18 um 19:17 schrieb David Blaikie via cfe-users:
> Possible that the online one isn't built with assertions enabled (you
> could test this with other known crashers to see if they repro
Hi Maarten,
I am not a windows user and never build with mingw in my life. :)
Did you try out building a release-version of LLVM first? Sometimes
there are breaking changes committed that e.g. linux-users will not
notice on their system. Our Buildbots have to catch up first before the
issue is th
Please open a bug report instead.
Best Jonas
Am 19.10.2018 um 00:39 schrieb Mat Sutcliffe via cfe-users:
> Hello list,
>
> The following code generates one false positive of the -Wcomma
> warning: (tested with clang trunk via Matt Godbolt's Compiler
> Explorer)
>
> template
> void foo()
> {
>
Could you please report this as a bug at
https://bugs.llvm.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=clang
Best, Jonas
Am 21.08.2018 um 08:01 schrieb Itaru Kitayama via cfe-users:
> Hi,
> I am seeing a application build error shown below:
>
> [ 7%] Building CXX object sli/CMakeFiles/sli_lib.dir/filesy
Hi,
very interesting. My experience with normal compilation is, that clang
is faster.
Could it be, that there are some precompiled headers or similar present
on the system, that GCC utilizes?
Best Regards, Jonas
Am 01.08.2018 um 13:23 schrieb Florian Berger via cfe-users:
> Hi,
>
> I am a long
I dont think so. What do you want to achieve? Clang-tidy will just build
the AST from Code and do its analysis on it. I do not see a reason for a
different toolchain.
Am 19.06.2018 um 11:30 schrieb kimmyzhang(张亚霏) via cfe-users:
>
> As is known, clang can select another toolchain through:
>
> cla
This is a question relating clang-refactor i guess. Maybe ask on cfe-dev
since its development specific.
Am 05.05.2018 um 02:22 schrieb ? ?? via cfe-users:
> Dear Clang users:
> I have a class named classA in a.h and a.cpp file. it have
> some methods, I want to add a new method def
Forwarding, because the guy didnt include the mailing lists in the response.
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:?? [cfe-dev] [cfe-users] building clang for target off
Datum: Wed, 2 May 2018 20:32:26 +0800
Von: <772847...@qq.com>
An: cfe-dev
you may n
+cfe-dev
Am 30.04.2018 um 06:41 schrieb Jost, Gabriele (ARC-TNC)[CSRA, LLC] via
cfe-users:
> Hello,
> I am trying to build clang with GPU support, in particular with
> support for OpenMP target offload.
> I want to build for a Xeon+Nvidia GPU.
> I did this:
> git clone https://github.com/clang-yk
+cfe-dev
The people familiar with clang-format are more likely active there :)
Am 17.04.2018 um 09:40 schrieb Daniel via cfe-users:
>
> Hello,
>
> For the senior project in my undergraduate studies, my team and I are
> developing a tool that will evaluate the format and code conventions
> of a
I believe the default standard did change to c++14. How did you compile?
Could you make a case in godbolt.org?
Am 27.03.2018 um 04:52 schrieb Yuri via cfe-users:
> This testcase:
>
> # include
> # include
>
> # define _I ((complex_t)(1i))
> typedef std::complex complex_t;
>
> complex_t f(const
18 matches
Mail list logo
