Yeah, not sure, sorry - I don't often do performance measurements of Clang.
Don's advice is probably about right.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:29 AM, jps...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Don and David, just wanted to see if you guys had any quick thoughts on
> any of this before I just resign to live with
The svn version is under heavy development, so there are no guarantees that
a particular revision will even compile and/or pass the tests, much less be
suitable for any particular purpose.
If you need more than that, I'd suggest you stick to either apple's
version, or an official release.
I live
Hi Don and David, just wanted to see if you guys had any quick thoughts on
any of this before I just resign to live with a 35% slower clang than I'm
used to (it's possible that the previous version from Xcode is much slimmed
down or otherwise very carefully tuned in some way).
Thank you,
Jim
On F
