r312007 - [modules-ts] Omit submodule semantics for TS modules

Author: borisk Date: Tue Aug 29 08:30:18 2017 New Revision: 312007 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=312007&view=rev Log: [modules-ts] Omit submodule semantics for TS modules If a TS module name has more than one component (e.g., foo.bar) then we erroneously activated the submodule sem

r312105 - [modules] Add ability to specify module name to module file mapping

Author: borisk Date: Wed Aug 30 01:45:59 2017 New Revision: 312105 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=312105&view=rev Log: [modules] Add ability to specify module name to module file mapping Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [=] value format. If the name is omitted, then th

r312106 - [docs] Regenerate command line options reference

Author: borisk Date: Wed Aug 30 02:15:53 2017 New Revision: 312106 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=312106&view=rev Log: [docs] Regenerate command line options reference Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst

Re: [PATCH] D35020: [Modules] Add ability to specify module name to module file mapping

Victor Leschuk writes: > Hello Boris, looks like this revision broke tests on our win10 builder: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast/builds/11760 > > Clang :: CXX/modules-ts/basic/basic.link/module-declaration.cpp > > I had to revert this revisio

r312217 - Fix path regex in test to match on Windows

Author: borisk Date: Wed Aug 30 23:18:08 2017 New Revision: 312217 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=312217&view=rev Log: Fix path regex in test to match on Windows Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/modules-ts/basic/basic.link/module-declaration.cpp Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/modules

r312220 - [modules] Add ability to specify module name to module file mapping (reapply)

Author: borisk Date: Wed Aug 30 23:26:43 2017 New Revision: 312220 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=312220&view=rev Log: [modules] Add ability to specify module name to module file mapping (reapply) Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [=] value format. If the name is omitte

[clang] Llvm modules on demand bmi (PR #71773)

boris-kolpackov wrote: >clang++ -std=c++20 foo.cpp -c -fmodule-file=X=some/dir/X.pcm Hm, according to https://clang.llvm.org/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.html this can already be achieved with the `-fmodule-output` options (which I was about to try in `build2`). Is there a reason a diffe

[clang] [clang][modules] Print library module manifest path. (PR #76451)

boris-kolpackov wrote: If I understand correctly, this invents a new option just to print the std modules path. Is there a reason why we cannot just print this information as part of `-print-search-dirs`? The benefit of this will be saving an extra compiler invocation in case the build system

[clang] [clang][modules] Print library module manifest path. (PR #76451)

boris-kolpackov wrote: > I had looked at `-print-search-dirs` but it seems buggy. For example, it > ignores the `-stdlib` flag to the compiler invocation. True. I couldn't find a bug report for this so I filed one: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76614 > Solving this seems a lot

[clang] [Serialization] Downgrade inconsistent flags from erros to warnings (PR #115416)

boris-kolpackov wrote: I don't know, I feel like you are just kicking the can down the road: if the user sees a harmless warning continuously, they will suppress this warning, and then won't see the harmful ones in the future. But then again we do this all the time in C++, so I guess it's par

[clang] [Serialization] Downgrade error to warning for inconsistent language flags (PR #117840)

boris-kolpackov wrote: > Maybe then we could adapt the Fortran/ASM convention where an uppercase > extension means "I need preprocessing" and lowercase doesn't. (tongue lightly > in cheek…) >From https://build2.org/build2/doc/build2-build-system-manual.xhtml : > The `preprocessed` property in