For the tests I've extracted the int5 and int8 cases to cater for
different alignments for different platform ABIs. For Linux on POWER the
5 and 8 element vectors must be naturally aligned with respect to the
total "soft" vector size, despite being represented as an aggregate.
Specifically, the pat
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
---
lib/Basic/Targets.cpp | 11 +++
lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp | 14 --
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp b/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp
index fdedd91a3e15..6d7f37f2479a 100644
--- a/lib/Basic/Targ
Ping - Is anyone happy to review or apply the patch?
If I've missed some process I should have followed, please let me know!
Andrew
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 22:30 +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery
> ---
> lib/Basic/Targets.cpp | 11 +++
> lib/CodeGen/Target
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 14:01 -0700, Adrian Prantl wrote:
> Is it possible to add a testcase for this?
I will look into it.
Thanks for the review!
Andrew
>
> -- adrian
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 2017, at 5:00 AM, Andrew Jeffery via cfe-commits
> > wrote:
> >
>
Ping - is anyone able to provide feedback?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 16:02 +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> For the tests I've extracted the int5 and int8 cases to cater for
> different alignments for different platform ABIs. For Linux on POWER the
> 5 and 8 element vectors must be natu
Another friendly ping :)
Cheers,
Andrew
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 11:23 +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Ping - is anyone able to provide feedback?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew
>
> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 16:02 +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > For the tests I've extracted the int5 and int8 cases to cater f
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 08:26 -0700, Adrian Prantl wrote:
> > > > On Jun 21, 2017, at 11:32 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >
> > For the tests I've extracted the int5 and int8 cases to cater for
> > different alignments for different platform ABIs. For Linux on POWER the
> > 5 and 8 element vectors mu
Hi Hal,
On Sat, 2017-07-22 at 23:26 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 10:26 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote:
> > > > > > On Jun 21, 2017, at 11:32 PM, Andrew Jeffery
> > > > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > For the tests I've extracted the int5 and int8 cases to cater for
> > > different alignments for di
On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 09:32 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Andrew Jeffery wrote on 24.07.2017 03:54:05:
>
> > > > > + bool shouldPassIndirectlyForSwift(CharUnits totalSize,
> > > > > +ArrayRef scalars,
> > > > > +bool asRe
For the tests I've extracted the int5 and int8 cases to cater for
different alignments for different platform ABIs. For Linux on POWER the
5 and 8 element vectors must be naturally aligned with respect to the
total "soft" vector size, despite being represented as an aggregate.
Specifically, the pat
Ping - does anyone have a moment to take a look?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 13:52 +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> For the tests I've extracted the int5 and int8 cases to cater for
> different alignments for different platform ABIs. For Linux on POWER the
> 5 and 8 element vectors must b
11 matches
Mail list logo
