@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -aux-triple nvptx64-nvidia-cuda -fcuda-is-device \
+// RUN: -x cuda -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEVICE
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -aux-tripl
brunodf-snps wrote:
Tagging @erichkeane @Sirraide
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159316
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/adityankit ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Nikita Popov (nikic)
Changes
This adds a new pass for dropping assumes that are unlikely to be useful for
further optimization.
It works by discarding any assumes whose affected values are one-use (whi
Varnike wrote:
> Are there any smaller parts we can split away into their own reviews to
> start moving it forward?
Yes, I think it will be possible to divide the patch into several separate
ones. However, they will depend on the patch with changes to intruction
selection patterns (commit 9e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Keshav Vinayak Jha (keshavvinayak01)
Changes
## Description
Added support for AMDGPU signed (med3) intrinsics. Implemented `smed3` and
`umed3` ISA instructions from ROCDL with complete end-to-end support i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Replace `StackChunk::End` with `StackChunk::Size`, mark the allocating code
paths as unlikely and move `grow()` into the header, which allows us to
template this for the `Size` parameter. Since we only push
Author: Vy Nguyen
Date: 2025-09-16T13:34:35-04:00
New Revision: b8efe1c64746e832bc3313ec2f6a23f09f2d2dd9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8efe1c64746e832bc3313ec2f6a23f09f2d2dd9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8efe1c64746e832bc3313ec2f6a23f09f2d2dd9.diff
LOG
sarnex wrote:
No problem, thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Weibo He (NewSigma)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#155339 because of CI fail
---
Patch is 155.29 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159236.
bursot wrote:
> I added suggestions for two different patterns with the correct code. Please
> check the same pattern, and feel free to put any pattern that it's confusing
> so we can discuss it
Please could you look the last commits. Is those true.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1
RKSimon wrote:
@abhinavp5 Make sure you don't update again or the auto-merge will fail
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158142
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Corentin Jabot (cor3ntin)
Changes
Not all non-type template arguments are modeled as NonTypeTemplateParmDecl.
Fixes #151531
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159314.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/
kovdan01 wrote:
@MaskRay Would be glad to see your feedback considering the info from my
comments above
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113150
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: None (ShashwathiNavada)
Changes
As described in section 2.14.6 of openmp spec, the patch implements support for
iterator in motion clauses.
---
Patch is 26.05 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/l
@@ -11599,6 +11599,89 @@ static bool handleVectorElementCast(EvalInfo &Info,
const FPOptions FPO,
return false;
}
+enum class PackKind {
+ SSWB,
+ USWB,
+ SSDW,
+ USDW
+}; // 16→8 signed/unsigned; 32→16 signed/unsigned
+
+static bool evalPackBuiltin(const CallExpr *E, E
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159274
Both the expression (the initializer) as well as the VarDecl can't be null
here. Assert that.
>From ed0797da5f059b7f6e560a8f07c455937afd9721 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date:
@@ -543,30 +661,328 @@ static ExprResult calculateConstraintSatisfaction(
return ExprError();
}
- assert(EvalResult.Val.isInt() &&
- "evaluating bool expression didn't produce int");
- Satisfaction.IsSatisfied = EvalResult.Val.getInt().getBoolValue();
- if (!S
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvH
https://github.com/benlangmuir edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150123
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Fznamznon approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159275
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chaitanyav updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159277
>From c73c23f8aa29bcd6664d5bbc66b8f451c542892b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NagaChaitanya Vellanki
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:04:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix for BreakTemplateDeclarations and
vitalybuka wrote:
Maybe nice to call it kcfi_sault?
-fsanitize=kcfi is completely different from -fsanitize=cfi, so it would be
consistent to keep the convention in attributes as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141846
___
cfe-commits
zygoloid wrote:
Do we also have test coverage for mangling the names of lambdas that appear in
inline variables and variable templates? Those are the cases where it's
critical to get this right in plain C++ without language extensions. Also, do
we have test coverage for the case where multiple
https://github.com/madhur13490 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142686
>From e2f53441f1a2d35af7c0d6d177afea79c7af2c47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Pop
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 13:50:38 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] add -floop-fuse to clang and flang
---
clang/include
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2025-09-14T11:29:00+02:00
New Revision: 1b1b83ffacc56e0c6344be25a7238f509fd705e6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b1b83ffacc56e0c6344be25a7238f509fd705e6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b1b83ffacc56e0c6344be25a7238f509fd705e6.diff
LO
https://github.com/bd1976bris edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159418
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon auto_merge_enabled
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157652
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -aux-triple nvptx64-nvidia-cuda -fcuda-is-device \
+// RUN: -x cuda -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEVICE
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -aux-tripl
https://github.com/bd1976bris updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159151
>From 42b3a5d533f3b6855949b9b44439a441943862ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dunbobbin
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 19:34:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [DTLTO][TEST] Make Clang driver tests more robust
The Clang
Gelbpunkt wrote:
Gentle ping, I really hope this PR isn't forgotten about :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149725
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvHQ=?= ,
Burhan =?utf-8?b?U8O2xJ/DvH
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón (alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource)
Changes
- `ArrayBoundChecker` now directly models index accesses on
`ConstantArrayType`, enabling more detection of out-of-bounds (OOB) accesses
for arrays with known constant sizes
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Ingo Müller (ingomueller-net)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#131804.
This breaks a build bot; see discussion in the original PR. I could reproduce
this problem locally. The problem is that the original PR makes use of
`registerCu
ingomueller-net wrote:
I have tried to add the missing dependency as follows:
```patch
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/CMakeLists.txt
b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/CMakeLists.txt
index 153356245cfd..d3bbe0176688 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang-too
https://github.com/bd1976bris created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159158
Make the test regexes more permissive to fix buildbot failures caused by the
merge of PR https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159129. This is the same
fix as applied in: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ BUILTIN(__builtin_arm_wfi, "v", "")
BUILTIN(__builtin_arm_sev, "v", "")
BUILTIN(__builtin_arm_sevl, "v", "")
BUILTIN(__builtin_arm_chkfeat, "WUiWUi", "")
-TARGET_HEADER_BUILTIN(__yield, "v", "h", ARMACLE_H, ALL_LANGUAGES, "")
-TARGET_HEADER_BUILTIN(__wfe,
https://github.com/carlosgalvezp approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158434
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ivanmurashko wrote:
> LGTM if PR description is updated.
Ah, I forgot to update the PR description, that was just fixed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157667
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
flovent wrote:
> Do you wish to have this merged or wait for your commit approval (it can take
> 2-3week if unlucky)?
I think it's not necessary to wait, please help me merge it, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157123
___
cfe-commit
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2025-09-09T09:56:24-07:00
New Revision: 20c08f36d7d39c97a4979d9a9fd1a5b7fb53e268
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20c08f36d7d39c97a4979d9a9fd1a5b7fb53e268
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20c08f36d7d39c97a4979d9a9fd1a5b7fb53e268.diff
L
https://github.com/rnk approved this pull request.
Thanks Ilya!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159312
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -29,3 +29,9 @@ __attribute__ ((__format_arg__(2))) // expected-error
{{'__format_arg__' attribu
void test (int, ...);
void __attribute__ ((alloc_size (2, 3))) *test2(int, ...); // expected-error
{{'alloc_size' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds}}
+
+void gh159080_a(vo
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chaitanyav updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159277
>From 7eb6b33350e4887fca8ca882ab1a46fe811017b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NagaChaitanya Vellanki
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:04:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix for BreakTemplateDeclarations and
https://github.com/Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158134
>From a9dbb90836fb5f99ce282445a893a10bfaa74903 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ritanya B Bharadwaj
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:49:20 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Parsing and Sema support for groupprivate
@@ -70,3 +70,8 @@ enum type) are set to 0.
enum Enum1 Array3[2][2] = {{Enum1_A, Enum1_A}}; // warn: elements of second
array are initialized to 0
struct Struct1 S1 = {1}; // warn: element 'b' is initialized to 0
+
+.. option:: IgnoredContainers
+
+Semicolon-separated list
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+//===- IntrinsicsRISCVXMIPS.td - Defines MIPS intrinsics ---*- tablegen
-*-===//
topperc wrote:
Limit line to 80 columns
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159246
___
cfe-commits mailing l
https://github.com/thurstond commented:
I approve of the MemorySanitizer-related portion of this pull request. (The
rest of the change looks reasonable to me but I'll defer to the code owners /
experts.) Thanks for adding the intrinsic cases and updating the test files :-).
https://github.com/
https://github.com/lei137 requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154715
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
@philnik777
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158048
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
+#include "llvm/Option/ArgList.h"
+#include "llvm/Option/OptTable.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Error.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/InitLLVM.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+
+using namespace ll
https://github.com/Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158134
>From a9dbb90836fb5f99ce282445a893a10bfaa74903 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ritanya B Bharadwaj
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:49:20 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Parsing and Sema support for groupprivate
jvoung wrote:
Hi, @martinboehme or other reviewers -- is the response in the discourse post
from tbaeder (and link to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106552#issuecomment-2320298264 )
enough for the concern about getting the rule correct? Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
https://github.com/mstorsjo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159333
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2025-09-17T20:46:44+03:00
New Revision: 6db244a58626e885ba010b3d6813191485e18e90
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6db244a58626e885ba010b3d6813191485e18e90
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6db244a58626e885ba010b3d6813191485e18e90.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+! RUN: %flang_fc1 -fopenmp -emit-hlfir %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+program p
+ type y3; integer, allocatable :: x; end type
+ type(y3) :: v
+ integer :: s, n, i
+ s = 1; n = 10
+ allocate(v%x); v%x = 0
+!$omp parallel
+ if (.not. allocated(v%x)) print *, '101
@@ -5,3 +5,26 @@ void g(void) {
__attribute__((cleanup(f))) void *g;
}
+// Test for cleanup in for-loop initialization (PR #154624)
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c89 -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=C89
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck
Author: Ingo Müller
Date: 2025-09-17T19:00:34+02:00
New Revision: 6fdecaa7709a395c3ad5f47928f0290fbd0446c9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fdecaa7709a395c3ad5f47928f0290fbd0446c9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fdecaa7709a395c3ad5f47928f0290fbd0446c9.diff
L
@@ -194,11 +194,17 @@ int main(int, char**) {
ASSERT_NOT_CONSTEXPR_CXX23(std::fminf(1.0f, 0.0f) == 0.0f);
ASSERT_NOT_CONSTEXPR_CXX23(std::fminl(1.0L, 0.0L) == 0.0L);
+#if !__has_constexpr_builtin(__builtin_fma)
ASSERT_NOT_CONSTEXPR_CXX23(std::fma(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f) == 2.
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159330
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-09-17T16:07:12+02:00
New Revision: d6315a260baddd5454a02878a78f0e9ae41860d9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6315a260baddd5454a02878a78f0e9ae41860d9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6315a260baddd5454a02878a78f0e9ae41860d9.diff
L
paschalis-mpeis wrote:
Hey @boomanaiden154,
PR #155957 breaks our buildbot:
[bolt-aarch64-ubuntu-clang](https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/126).
Example build: [#2628](https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/126/builds/2628):
> ld.lld:
> /home/buildbot/workspace/bolt-aarch64-ubuntu-clan
@@ -1778,10 +1778,20 @@ def ext_bit_int : Extension<
} // end of Parse Issue category.
let CategoryName = "Modules Issue" in {
-def err_unexpected_module_decl : Error<
- "module declaration can only appear at the top level">;
+def err_invalid_module_or_import_directive : Erro
HerrCai0907 wrote:
> I see builds failing in the link, per the report from @llvm-ci above:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/9815
>
> ```
> FAILED: lib/libclangTidy.so.22.0git
> : && /home/buildbots/llvm-external-buildbots/clang.19.1.7/bin/clang++
> --gcc-toolchain=/gcc-to
ingomueller-net wrote:
I'll also revert #159289, which adapts the bazel build files to the original
change. I would be grateful if that PR were included into a possible new
version of the reverted PR or re-applied after that new PR is merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159380
__
=?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix-Antoine?= Constantin
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -219,6 +219,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check by adding detection for
variables introduced by structured bindings.
+- Improved :doc:`bugprone-invalid-enum-default-initialization
+ ` with new
+
=?utf-8?q?Félix-Antoine?= Constantin
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -88,12 +90,22 @@ class FindEnumMember : public TypeVisitor {
InvalidEnumDefaultInitializationCheck::InvalidEnumDefaultInitializationCheck(
StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
-: ClangTidyCheck(Na
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 requested changes to this pull request.
What exactly is the motivation for this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159367
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Lancern created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159390
Most lowering patterns have exactly the same class declaration with different
names and different `matchAndRewrite` implementations, yet their declaration
occupies near 1000 lines of code in `LowerToLLVM.h`, ma
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sirui Mu (Lancern)
Changes
Most lowering patterns have exactly the same class declaration with different
names and different `matchAndRewrite` implementations, yet their declaration
occupies near 1000 lines of code in `LowerToLLVM.h`, mak
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159392
Fixed #156295, #122480
The original ast matcher based member initializer detection is bug prone. In
this PR we introduce a new recusively detection which can be easier extended to
detect whether we can move
https://github.com/Fznamznon approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159312
This popped up during our internal integrates of upstream changes. It started
happening after ba9d1c41c41d568a798e0a8c38a89d294647c28d, which started using
`TemplateSpecializationType` in this place and t
Author: bd1976bris
Date: 2025-09-17T08:54:19+01:00
New Revision: 2ef58b603883c724805fc209ca753987efce3957
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ef58b603883c724805fc209ca753987efce3957
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ef58b603883c724805fc209ca753987efce3957.diff
LO
kimgr wrote:
@mizvekov Does this make sense to you? Hoping I interpreted your intent
correctly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159154
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
Fznamznon wrote:
I spoke offline with @tahonermann last week and gave another week for review.
I'm going to proceed with the merge. Please feel free to do post commit review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139566
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
https://github.com/chaitanyav updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159277
>From e982d802000131cd76a1b581142d5c13abfdd349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NagaChaitanya Vellanki
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:04:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix for BreakTemplateDeclarations and
=?utf-8?q?Félix-Antoine?= Constantin,
=?utf-8?q?Félix-Antoine?= Constantin
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -88,12 +90,22 @@ class FindEnumMember : public TypeVisitor {
InvalidEnumDefaultInitializationCheck::InvalidEnumDefaultInitializationCheck(
StringRef Name, ClangTidyCont
https://github.com/Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158134
>From a9dbb90836fb5f99ce282445a893a10bfaa74903 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ritanya B Bharadwaj
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:49:20 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Parsing and Sema support for groupprivate
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++14-or-later %s
modernize-return-braced-init-list %t
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s modernize-return-braced-init-list %t
localspook wrote:
```suggestion
// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++11-or-later %s
modernize-
https://github.com/makslevental updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157944
>From 514f5574c5e5f2d1db63d3e55105be16a509de82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maksim Levental
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 07:53:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] [CI] Update monolithic-linux.sh
---
.ci/monolithi
@@ -995,7 +995,12 @@ void
CodeGenAction::runOptimizationPipeline(llvm::raw_pwrite_stream &os) {
// Create the pass manager.
llvm::ModulePassManager mpm;
- if (opts.PrepareForFullLTO)
+ if (opts.PrepareForFatLTO) {
+bool emitSummary = opts.PrepareForThinLTO || opts.P
@@ -1494,8 +1484,35 @@ static bool parseLinkerOptionsArgs(CompilerInvocation
&invoc,
return false;
}
- invoc.getCodeGenOpts().DependentLibs =
+ opts.DependentLibs =
args.getAllArgValues(clang::driver::options::OPT_dependent_lib);
+
+ // -flto=full/thin option.
@@ -1494,8 +1484,35 @@ static bool parseLinkerOptionsArgs(CompilerInvocation
&invoc,
return false;
}
- invoc.getCodeGenOpts().DependentLibs =
+ opts.DependentLibs =
args.getAllArgValues(clang::driver::options::OPT_dependent_lib);
+
+ // -flto=full/thin option.
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+! UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
+! check flto-partitions is passed to lld, fc1
+! RUN: %flang -### -fuse-ld=lld -flto=full -flto-partitions=16 %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=LLD-PART,FC1-PART
+
+! FC1-PART: "-fc1"
+! FC1-PART-SAME: "-flto=full"
+! FC1-PAR
https://github.com/makslevental updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157944
>From 514f5574c5e5f2d1db63d3e55105be16a509de82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maksim Levental
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 07:53:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] [CI] Update monolithic-linux.sh
---
.ci/monolithi
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
I think this makes sense, it seems to do as described at least. I'm not sure
WHAT, but it feels like we could/should do a better job with some demonstrative
tests though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159463
___
efriedma-quic wrote:
In any context where the standard requires constant evaluation, we have to
return false, probably. (This corresponds, roughly, to Info.InConstantContext.
I don't think we have a bit that precisely corresponds, though.)
We probably do want to fold in tryEvaluateObjectSize
https://github.com/frasercrmck approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mizvekov wrote:
> I think this makes sense, it seems to do as described at least. I'm not sure
> WHAT, but it feels like we could/should do a better job with some
> demonstrative tests though.
I am open to suggestions, I can't think of anything which would demonstrate
this better or show some
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+//===--- FeatureModulesRegistryTests.cpp
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/spall commented:
Can you add an array test?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158361
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Karlo Basioli
Date: 2025-09-11T11:55:59+01:00
New Revision: e7429c2e10b1e30a0b1a18cc7290ab95a7e83b6a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e7429c2e10b1e30a0b1a18cc7290ab95a7e83b6a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e7429c2e10b1e30a0b1a18cc7290ab95a7e83b6a.diff
@@ -3011,6 +3016,37 @@ void CodeGenModule::ConstructAttributeList(StringRef
Name,
}
assert(ArgNo == FI.arg_size());
+ ArgNo = 0;
+ if (AddedPotentialArgAccess && MemAttrForPtrArgs) {
+llvm::SmallSet ArgsToSkip;
+if (IRFunctionArgs.hasSRetArg()) {
+ ArgsToSk
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154765
>From 3e0abe10c53e08cc1ebf16662d8d58cd7245f70f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 23:27:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add pass which forwards unimplemented math builtins /
libcalls
@@ -3680,6 +3681,7 @@ bool SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node) {
Results.push_back(Tmp1);
break;
}
+ case ISD::STACKADDRESS:
case ISD::STACKSAVE:
// Expand to CopyFromReg if the target set
// StackPointerRegisterToSaveRestore.
https://github.com/chaitanyav updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159277
>From 44820a90771957eea02fb88a65dfe5d2e348f22d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NagaChaitanya Vellanki
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:04:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix for BreakTemplateDeclarations and
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-09-11T11:21:00+02:00
New Revision: 30f9fb7ca896a64701fda35f1a6629be912e086a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/30f9fb7ca896a64701fda35f1a6629be912e086a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/30f9fb7ca896a64701fda35f1a6629be912e086a.diff
L
501 - 600 of 678 matches
Mail list logo
