@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy --match-partial-fixes %s
llvm-use-new-mlir-op-builder %t
+
+namespace mlir {
+class Location {};
+class OpBuilder {
+public:
+ template
+ OpTy create(Location location, Args &&...args) {
+return OpTy(args...);
+ }
+ Location ge
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144368
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
>From b404f5390ac5684c7452e69f6fe209e5215f8929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:37:53 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [clang-tidy] Add MLIR check for old op builder usage.
DavidSpickett wrote:
Please change your email settings as explained in
https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#email-addresses. Right now it would
be merged with a GitHub noreply address.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144368
___
cfe-co
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150387
Fixes #150327
>From 12777c2044cc9daac3fffcb96c0c1f4c772e9147 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:22:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix a bug in `DerivePointerAlignment: tr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
Fixes #150327
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150387.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/Format.cpp (+3-2)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp (+
https://github.com/owenca milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
s-watanabe314 wrote:
@andykaylor Could you please comment on Clang's complex number warnings?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149028
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: None (Mermen)
Changes
This pass uses StackSafetyGlobalAnalysis to reduce number of functions that
require stack protector.
All llvm lit tests passed.
In llvm-test-suite it reduces number of instrumented functions by 13% (8883
-> 7
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-arm
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-globalisel
Author: None (Mermen)
Changes
This pass uses StackSafetyGlobalAnalysis to reduce number of functions that
require stack protector.
All llvm lit tests passed.
In llvm-test-suite it reduces number of inst
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo
Author: None (Mermen)
Changes
This pass uses StackSafetyGlobalAnalysis to reduce number of functions that
require stack protector.
All llvm lit tests passed.
In llvm-test-suite it reduces number of instrumented functions by 13% (8883
-> 772
https://github.com/Mermen created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150390
This pass uses StackSafetyGlobalAnalysis to reduce number of functions that
require stack protector.
All llvm lit tests passed.
In llvm-test-suite it reduces number of instrumented functions by 13% (8883 ->
77
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150367
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: None (Mermen)
Changes
This pass uses StackSafetyGlobalAnalysis to reduce number of functions that
require stack protector.
All llvm lit tests passed.
In llvm-test-suite it reduces number of instrumented functions by 13% (8883
Author: Eric Li
Date: 2025-07-24T04:06:03-04:00
New Revision: 531cf8298b08eacdf670bac8c28db97a5dc8cb01
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/531cf8298b08eacdf670bac8c28db97a5dc8cb01
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/531cf8298b08eacdf670bac8c28db97a5dc8cb01.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/tJener closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150361
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sjoerdmeijer wrote:
Hello, I am a `-Weverything` user, but not an expert...
First #148222 broke my build. I understood and experimental feature was enabled
under `-Weverything`.
This patch and fix improved things and I see less build failures, but my
problems haven't gone away.
Now Clang hangs
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
>From b404f5390ac5684c7452e69f6fe209e5215f8929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:37:53 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang-tidy] Add MLIR check for old op builder usage.
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
>From b404f5390ac5684c7452e69f6fe209e5215f8929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:37:53 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang-tidy] Add MLIR check for old op builder usage.
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy --match-partial-fixes %s llvm-mlir-op-builder %t
+
+namespace mlir {
+class Location {};
+class OpBuilder {
+public:
+ template
+ OpTy create(Location location, Args &&...args) {
+return OpTy(args...);
+ }
+ Location getUnknownL
@@ -71,7 +71,38 @@ def isVectorConfigInstr
PseudoVSETVLI,
PseudoVSETVLIX0,
PseudoVSETVLIX0X0,
- PseudoVSETIVLI
+ PseudoVSETIVLI,
+ PseudoSF_VSE
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150308
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tJener updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150361
>From 2c1a695bd602b45f68bdc97043ff2b144372230b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Li
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:18:05 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Stop ctor initializer from being inlined
The colon
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150361
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy --match-partial-fixes %s
llvm-use-new-mlir-op-builder %t
+
+namespace mlir {
+class Location {};
+class OpBuilder {
+public:
+ template
+ OpTy create(Location location, Args &&...args) {
+return OpTy(args...);
+ }
+ Location ge
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
+- LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/naoNao89 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150365
From 2d9ae771247af025d6319c044e9f8727e9bebfd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: naoNao89 <90588855+naona...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:54:02 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][StaticAnalyze
https://github.com/naoNao89 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150225
From 2d9ae771247af025d6319c044e9f8727e9bebfd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: naoNao89 <90588855+naona...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:54:02 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][StaticAnalyze
https://github.com/realqhc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150379
This patch supports RV32/64 extension instructions. The final patch split from
the original pull request will add RV32 Only instructions with register pair
operands.
Documentation:
https://jhauser.us/RISCV/ext
https://github.com/realqhc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150379
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
realqhc wrote:
I am seeking to receive review and comments on naming scheme for the tablegen
classes, like `RVPShiftN_ri` and `RVPBinaryScalar_rr`. Any suggesion would be
highly valuable. Thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150379
_
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150164
>From b9655ff6d54475b5697a63571734192c92a6af07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 06:05:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][ExprConst] Consider integer pointers of
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn -cl-std=clc++ -verify %s
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+#define fold(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? (x) : (x))
+static_assert(nullptr != fold(reinterpret_cast(0)));
+
+static_assert(nullptr == (private int *)0);
+
---
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -108,6 +108,12 @@ void foo1(void) {
: parallel)
otherwise(parallel for)
for (int i=0; i<10; i++)
;
+
+#pragma omp metadirective when(user = {condition(1)} \
+ : parallel for)
https://github.com/Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135807
>From 9c56e59ba9984c14c15a8d5a95a02e7192a64e8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ritanya B Bharadwaj
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 09:33:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [OpenMP] Parsing Support of ThreadSets in
@@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ enum class OpenMPOffloadMappingFlags : uint64_t {
// dynamic.
// This is an OpenMP extension for the sake of OpenACC support.
OMP_MAP_OMPX_HOLD = 0x2000,
+ /// Self directs mapping without creating a separate device copy.
+ OMP_MAP_SELF = 0x4000,
---
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2025-07-24T15:30:51+08:00
New Revision: 07faafe4a4d0a5bd82b648aa9717783f001ddfae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/07faafe4a4d0a5bd82b648aa9717783f001ddfae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/07faafe4a4d0a5bd82b648aa9717783f001ddfae.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149782
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett requested changes to this pull request.
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that a certain sort of assistive
interactive tool was used to generate this. Which I don't venture an opinion on
in general but in this case, it's didn't do so well.
A glance at t
zyn0217 wrote:
@tstellar thanks! Feel free to open an issue about that if you got something :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143096
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic commented:
Why is this a separate pass that removes attributes from the *function* if
*all* allocas are safe, rather than integrated with the actual stack
protection, so that the decision can be made per alloca?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150390
@@ -12166,6 +12174,15 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
diag::note_ovl_candidate_explicit_arg_mismatch_unnamed)
<< (index + 1);
}
+
+if (PartialDiagnosticAt *PDiag = DeductionFailure.getSFINAEDiagnost
Author: Benjamin Maxwell
Date: 2025-07-24T09:42:05+01:00
New Revision: c049732d7f946492ec3f6f5e7c3b845b7133fca8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c049732d7f946492ec3f6f5e7c3b845b7133fca8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c049732d7f946492ec3f6f5e7c3b845b7133fca8.di
https://github.com/MacDue closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150333
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pawosm-arm wrote:
@sjoerdmeijer clang doesn't terminate for me too these days (see #150336) but I
tracked it down to PR #144408
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/20236
Here is the relevant
Author: Baranov Victor
Date: 2025-07-24T23:03:17+03:00
New Revision: 46e1d3d2a4394b805428111043d73aab309f44f0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46e1d3d2a4394b805428111043d73aab309f44f0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46e1d3d2a4394b805428111043d73aab309f44f0.diff
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vbvictor wrote:
I will make the renaming on the next PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150296
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2025-07-24T22:23:30+02:00
New Revision: 1031f14e921ad54ca17333f59cb19a981f864d95
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1031f14e921ad54ca17333f59cb19a981f864d95
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1031f14e921ad54ca17333f59cb19a981f864d95.diff
LO
https://github.com/gamesh411 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gamesh411 wrote:
The overall check implementation looks great. Once the name is settled, it is
ready IMO.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140086
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks for looking into this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
https://github.com/amitamd7 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150580
Added support for detecting OMP Target Directive and OMP From Clause in Clang
Unit Test Framework
>From 846d871783d572667cb8bdb954961f274e04702c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amtiwari
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Amit Tiwari (amitamd7)
Changes
Added support for detecting OMP Target Directive and OMP From Clause in Clang
Unit Test Framework
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150580.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
>From 32c9e86d027efc84ba696a38ef626ae04d306ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kiran Chandramohan
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:33:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[flang][flang-driver][mlir][OpenMP] atomi
@@ -12908,6 +12908,14 @@ def err_sycl_special_type_num_init_method : Error<
"types with 'sycl_special_class' attribute must have one and only one
'__init' "
"method defined">;
+// SYCL external attribute diagnostics
+def err_sycl_attribute_invalid_linkage : Error<
+ "'sy
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang`
running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while building `clang,flang,mlir` at step
6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/bui
@@ -218,6 +221,64 @@ Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitWebAssemblyBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
Function *Callee = CGM.getIntrinsic(Intrinsic::wasm_ref_null_func);
return Builder.CreateCall(Callee);
}
+ case WebAssembly::BI__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointer_signature:
@@ -218,6 +221,64 @@ Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitWebAssemblyBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
Function *Callee = CGM.getIntrinsic(Intrinsic::wasm_ref_null_func);
return Builder.CreateCall(Callee);
}
+ case WebAssembly::BI__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointer_signature:
@@ -218,6 +221,64 @@ Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitWebAssemblyBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
Function *Callee = CGM.getIntrinsic(Intrinsic::wasm_ref_null_func);
return Builder.CreateCall(Callee);
}
+ case WebAssembly::BI__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointer_signature:
@@ -227,6 +227,53 @@ bool SemaWasm::BuiltinWasmTableCopy(CallExpr *TheCall) {
return false;
}
+bool SemaWasm::BuiltinWasmTestFunctionPointerSignature(CallExpr *TheCall) {
+ if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 1))
+return true;
+
+ Expr *FuncPtrArg = TheCall->getArg(0);
https://github.com/lenary edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148134
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22259,6 +22260,10 @@ SDValue RISCVTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments(
reportFatalUsageError(
"'SiFive-CLIC-*' interrupt kinds require XSfmclic extension");
+if (Kind == "rnmi" && !Subtarget.hasStdExtSmrnmi())
+ reportFatalUsageError("Handling of
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ def riscv_sret_glue : RVSDNode<"SRET_GLUE", SDTNone,
[SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue]>;
def riscv_mret_glue : RVSDNode<"MRET_GLUE", SDTNone,
[SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue]>;
+def riscv_mnret_glue : RVSD
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150520
This change implements correct lowering of function aliases to the LLVM dialect.
>From 88039a468792435666e3026b5bf42ad31405d332 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:14:35 -070
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This change implements correct lowering of function aliases to the LLVM dialect.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150520.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CIR/Lowering
Author: Erick Velez
Date: 2025-07-24T19:49:54-07:00
New Revision: 2ca8cf922ff8f9498ae0f9def9dab9bf145c6653
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ca8cf922ff8f9498ae0f9def9dab9bf145c6653
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ca8cf922ff8f9498ae0f9def9dab9bf145c6653.diff
L
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
>From d8e460ad55c4e2353ee507c5f03eb344a46353e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:16:42 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] precommit test for function comments
---
.../clang-d
Author: Mike Crowe
Date: 2025-07-24T22:40:41+03:00
New Revision: 60bf97983df3efeb17f6db19b811b68fa74df9aa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60bf97983df3efeb17f6db19b811b68fa74df9aa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60bf97983df3efeb17f6db19b811b68fa74df9aa.diff
LO
https://github.com/bob80905 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
andykaylor wrote:
I'm not sure the combined warning is necessary. I think just stating that the
clang option overrides the GCC option is sufficient since there is no sense in
which clang-specific options can be incompatible with GCC if GCC doesn't
implement the option.
I think we're all in ag
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
> Style Guide has been updated internally. I don't know how long it takes to
> make its way to the public site, so I'd like to proceed. I've pasted the
> updated text into the commit description above.
I still think we should wait until it becomes official. WDYT @mydeveloperday
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang-tools-extra` at step 9
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang-extra".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/337
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/gamesh411 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150417
This adds alpha.core.StoreToImmutable, a new alpha checker that detects writes
to immutable memory regions, implementing part of SEI CERT Rule ENV30-C. The
original proposal only handled global const variables,
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
>From b404f5390ac5684c7452e69f6fe209e5215f8929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:37:53 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] [clang-tidy] Add MLIR check for old op builder usage.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Endre Fülöp (gamesh411)
Changes
This adds alpha.core.StoreToImmutable, a new alpha checker that detects writes
to immutable memory regions, implementing part of SEI CERT Rule ENV30-C. The
original proposal only handled global const variable
https://github.com/gulfemsavrun created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150414
None
>From 50fb66e961d077ffcec3960638b2173e278c2c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:40:22 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Fuchsia] Add STAGE2 flags for PGO
---
cla
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (gulfemsavrun)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150414.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia.cmake (+3)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia.cmake b/cla
mrkajetanp wrote:
> Is there a reason why we are preferring to generate constructs and then
> removing non-simd ones, as opposed to simply generating only simd?
I think both approaches have benefits and drawbacks, as usual. The current one
keeps all the logic closer together as opposed to havi
NagyDonat wrote:
> I almost suggested the same fix, but I found it weird that the symbol is
> conjured on linux with the caller stack frame, while on windows it was with
> the callee stack frame. However, I also understand that debugging a Windows
> only case might be beyond what we should inv
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp,h --
clang/docs/analyzer/checkers/storetoimmutable_examp
@@ -15534,17 +15534,28 @@ void Sema::AddPotentialMisalignedMembers(Expr *E,
RecordDecl *RD, ValueDecl *MD,
MisalignedMembers.emplace_back(E, RD, MD, Alignment);
}
-void Sema::DiagnoseMisalignedMembers() {
- for (MisalignedMember &m : MisalignedMembers) {
-const NamedDe
https://github.com/erichkeane requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,
=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,
=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tigbr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135831
>F
Author: Jacques Pienaar
Date: 2025-07-24T15:48:05+02:00
New Revision: 3feb6f971577701713034d3404b6737fe6462d43
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3feb6f971577701713034d3404b6737fe6462d43
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3feb6f971577701713034d3404b6737fe6462d43.dif
https://github.com/jpienaar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/statham-arm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150419
Depending on the particular version of the AArch32 architecture, load/store
exclusive operations might be available for various subset of 8, 16, 32, and
64-bit quantities. Sema knew nothing about this and w
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-arm
Author: Simon Tatham (statham-arm)
Changes
Depending on the particular version of the AArch32 architecture, load/store
exclusive operations might be available for various subset of 8, 16, 32, and
64-bit quantities. Sema knew nothing about t
=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,
=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=,
=?utf-8?b?R8OhYm9yIFTDs3RodsOhcmk=?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
tigbr wrote:
Fixed merge conflict in ReleaseNotes.rst with rebase.
https://github.
1 - 100 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
