llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
We don't need const on a return type.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146382.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h (+1-1)
``d
nikic wrote:
Reverse ping :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144383
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Dimitrije Dobrota
Date: 2025-06-30T22:36:23+03:00
New Revision: 0f291e5787a593a06f2e19a003ece7255f4957b4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f291e5787a593a06f2e19a003ece7255f4957b4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f291e5787a593a06f2e19a003ece7255f4957b4.d
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138757
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vbvictor approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138757
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@DimitrijeDobrota Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged
into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with
zygoloid wrote:
> This will indeed break building the Linux kernel for x86_64 at least in my
> brief test
[...]
> ```
> In file included from arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S:11:
> arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h:80:7: warning: '$' in identifier; did
> you mean to enable '-fdollars-in-iden
https://github.com/evelez7 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146165
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zygoloid wrote:
(I guess we could also warn if an object-like macro is expanded and the macro
name is preceded or followed by a `$` with no whitespace, since that would also
behave differently under `-fdollars-in-identifiers`, but I suspect that's not
worth worrying about in practice.)
https:
evelez7 wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Jun 30, 7:42 PM UTC**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull
request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/146165).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146165
Author: Erick Velez
Date: 2025-06-30T12:43:52-07:00
New Revision: a68e4470c16b4d45f78b6f69f59013c89bdf7ec2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a68e4470c16b4d45f78b6f69f59013c89bdf7ec2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a68e4470c16b4d45f78b6f69f59013c89bdf7ec2.diff
L
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144274
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Baranov Victor
Date: 2025-06-30T22:43:47+03:00
New Revision: 96b9b2e21de466490ba733a23e8bb6cbd39ad58c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96b9b2e21de466490ba733a23e8bb6cbd39ad58c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96b9b2e21de466490ba733a23e8bb6cbd39ad58c.diff
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146165
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146412
Converting back and forth for the source location raw encoding is unnecessary.
>From 21619dbe7f13c73c8657fac0410fe87ab8baeea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 17:06:01 +0200
Subj
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
Converting back and forth for the source location raw encoding is unnecessary.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146412.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/Decl
@@ -2767,6 +2767,10 @@ class DependentBitIntTypeLoc final
: public InheritingConcreteTypeLoc {};
+class PredefinedSugarTypeLoc final
+: public InheritingConcreteTypeLoc {};
YexuanXiao wrote:
I've simplified its definition, and now it's similar to
`BTF
Author: David Green
Date: 2025-06-30T17:15:26+01:00
New Revision: 6bd9ff04afdfbef1cf753f2cdd8a4e85ef6685eb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6bd9ff04afdfbef1cf753f2cdd8a4e85ef6685eb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6bd9ff04afdfbef1cf753f2cdd8a4e85ef6685eb.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146380
E is already of Expr * and shares the same declaration among all these
cases.
>From 3af2bd3b3743d16c45f759ecc38eaa0167e777d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:15:46 -0
https://github.com/mshockwave approved this pull request.
LGTM thanks. Sorry this PR slipped under my radar.
Just a little bit more context: 68k GCC actually uses a different ABI than
68k's SysV ABI: https://m680x0.github.io/doc/abi#scalar-types . And we decided
to implement GCC's ABI for now.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
E is already of Expr * and shares the same declaration among all these
cases.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146380.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CG
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
E is already of Expr * and shares the same declaration among all these
cases.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146380.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Co
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146382
We don't need const on a return type.
>From a43c0a81e99d409f8e7beb4c13be86accb57b3b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 19:28:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Basic] Drop const
Author: Rahul Joshi
Date: 2025-06-30T07:23:34-07:00
New Revision: d1ba2692ee523de2da502753e8e666d2ef530df3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1ba2692ee523de2da502753e8e666d2ef530df3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1ba2692ee523de2da502753e8e666d2ef530df3.diff
L
@@ -3639,6 +3639,64 @@ make the function's CFI jump table canonical. See
:ref:`the CFI documentation
}];
}
+def CFISaltDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+Use ``__attribute__((cfi_salt("")))`` on a function declaration, function
---
https://github.com/jurahul closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ElvinaYakubova wrote:
Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AlexVlx wrote:
> Right, I don't see any semantic reason why `__builtin_cpu_is` or
> `__builtin_cpu_supports` shouldn't be resolved statically if we have that
> information on hand. `-mcpu` / `-march` are not usually sufficient for
> folding `__builtin_cpu_is`, since those attributes just speci
Author: Dimitrije Dobrota
Date: 2025-06-30T22:13:33+03:00
New Revision: 6a57af8d0367eb22e3da9fc0957d74cb2f61c45c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6a57af8d0367eb22e3da9fc0957d74cb2f61c45c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6a57af8d0367eb22e3da9fc0957d74cb2f61c45c.d
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@DimitrijeDobrota Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged
into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138755
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/changpeng created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146409
These two instructions are supported by gfx1250. We define the instructions
and implement the corresponding intrinsic and builtin.
>From ea949512b4c2234dffad366cf782f6e5c62f37d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fro
vbvictor wrote:
Please fix merge conflicts that occurred after merge of `std::forward` PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138757
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Changpeng Fang (changpeng)
Changes
These two instructions are supported by gfx1250. We define the instructions
and implement the corresponding intrinsic and builtin.
---
Patch is 20.34 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full v
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Changpeng Fang (changpeng)
Changes
These two instructions are supported by gfx1250. We define the instructions
and implement the corresponding intrinsic and builtin.
---
Patch is 20.34 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/DimitrijeDobrota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138757
>From 28723cca6270be1cb2ebaddc23e47b3a7b38e6a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitrije Dobrota
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 22:42:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add flag to specify an alternative to std::move
https://github.com/kparzysz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146390
>From 7c294619f38984e26264d25524f6f5e79397f297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:45:43 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [STLForwardCompat] Implement llvm::type_identity, NFC
https://github.com/kparzysz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146390
>From 7c294619f38984e26264d25524f6f5e79397f297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:45:43 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [STLForwardCompat] Implement llvm::type_identity, NFC
hokein wrote:
> Sorry for being dumb... how are we getting away with only storing 40 bits?
> Does that not just artificially limit our source-location size for
> statements? And, frankly, then our entire space? I guess 8 2x-increases in
> source-location size are nice, but I was sort of hoping
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146283
>From f3fabc1028cecff6d7833f8e92b41f4e340c44e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 20:05:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CIR] Implement ArraySubscript for ComplexType
---
cla
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146380
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Erick Velez (evelez7)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146164.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/test/clang-doc/json/class.cpp (+41)
``diff
diff --git a/clang-to
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jansvoboda11 wrote:
(FWIW I have the alternative fix here:
https://github.com/jansvoboda11/llvm-project/commit/45f21d8adec34fdc13e86d529a133189ec1b1d15;
happy to create a PR after yours lands.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146342
___
cfe
rjmccall wrote:
> Slightly independently, cpu_supports might turn out a bit difficult to use,
> at least for us (and I suspect other targets), as the feature definitions are
> often ad hoc and sadly mutable.
Hmm. Well, you get to define what feature names you recognize in
`__builtin_cpu_suppo
AlexVlx wrote:
> Alex, can you talk about why your design decides to check for specific
> builtins rather than building out the set of features supported by
> `__builtin_cpu_supports`?
I went into it a bit above without having seen your question (race condition I
guess:) ), but to have it in
https://github.com/emaxx-google closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
emaxx-google wrote:
Superseded by #146153. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
1 nit, else this is ok. please make sure the comment gets added, but then feel
free to merge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146234
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llv
@@ -2660,6 +2644,122 @@ void X86AsmPrinter::emitCallInstruction(const
llvm::MCInst &MCI) {
OutStreamer->emitInstruction(MCI, getSubtargetInfo());
}
+// Checks whether a NOP is required after a CALL and inserts the NOP, if
+// necessary.
+void X86AsmPrinter::maybeEmitNopAfte
https://github.com/T0b1-iOS updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135230
>From 36ee902227e66c24cd7de42ed6a26637f440b4a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: T0b1
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:16:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang][CodeGen][X86] don't coerce int128 into
`{i64,i64}` for SysV
@@ -1214,6 +1214,12 @@ void __kmp_serialized_parallel(ident_t *loc, kmp_int32
global_tid) {
// Reset for next parallel region
this_thr->th.th_set_proc_bind = proc_bind_default;
+ // OpenMP 6.0 12.1.2 requires the num_threads 'strict' modifier to also have
+ // effect wh
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
I landed it in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5186d4aeeeca56a77404c2842e494524b7cdd4ba
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146326
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146326
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hokein wrote:
> I did a light pass of the 1st 1/4 of this or so. The smuggling back and forth
> to raw-encoding seems strange? WHy are we doing that here?
In this patch, to keep AST node size as small as possible, we're using 40 bits
of `StmtBits` to store the SourceLocation, we need this back
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Didn't know it. I'll revert this.
@ashwinbanwari it looks like you need to remove the diagnostics with `extern
"C++" main` and apply it with libc++ and land this finally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146247
___
cfe-com
@@ -742,8 +742,12 @@ class CXXBoolLiteralExpr : public Expr {
SourceLocation getBeginLoc() const { return getLocation(); }
SourceLocation getEndLoc() const { return getLocation(); }
- SourceLocation getLocation() const { return CXXBoolLiteralExprBits.Loc; }
- void setLoc
https://github.com/DimitrijeDobrota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138757
>From 28723cca6270be1cb2ebaddc23e47b3a7b38e6a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitrije Dobrota
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 22:42:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add flag to specify an alternative to std::move
rjmccall wrote:
> > On a different point: I don't think this builtin is actually semantically
> > different from `__builtin_cpu_is`. As long as we're not treating it as
> > `constexpr`, the fact that it's lowered by the compiler and doesn't need a
> > runtime check is just a happy property of
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1
-analyzer-checker=alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker -verify %s
+
rniwa wrote:
You wanna add:
```
// expected-no-diagnostics
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146369
___
@@ -2595,6 +2595,14 @@ GetX86_64ByValArgumentPair(llvm::Type *Lo, llvm::Type
*Hi,
ABIArgInfo X86_64ABIInfo::
classifyReturnType(QualType RetTy) const {
+ // return int128 as i128
+ if (const BuiltinType *BT = RetTy->getAs()) {
+BuiltinType::Kind k = BT->getKind();
+
@@ -2742,6 +2742,9 @@ bool RISCVInstrInfo::verifyInstruction(const MachineInstr
&MI,
case RISCVOp::OPERAND_UIMM9_LSB000:
Ok = isShiftedUInt<6, 3>(Imm);
break;
+case RISCVOp::OPERAND_UIMM9:
topperc wrote:
This is still unres
rjmccall wrote:
Alex, can you talk about why your design decides to check for specific builtins
rather than building out the set of features supported by
`__builtin_cpu_supports`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134016
___
cfe-commits maili
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)
Changes
A basic implementation until we get it in `std` in C++20.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146390.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/inc
MrSidims wrote:
Let me add my few cents here.
> In the case where the target features are known during clang codegen,
> lowering is easy: you just skip generating the bodies of the if statements
> that don't match. If you want to some kind of "runtime" (actual runtime, or
> SPIR-V compilation
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-06-30T10:11:07-07:00
New Revision: efc561c061bc15036f923f5b0b24133be54a6395
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/efc561c061bc15036f923f5b0b24133be54a6395
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/efc561c061bc15036f923f5b0b24133be54a6395.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146380
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DimitrijeDobrota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138755
>From b6d3a401284022bca317079154764c80b18dcbdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitrije Dobrota
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 22:18:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add flag to specify an alternative to std::forwa
https://github.com/kparzysz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146390
A basic implementation until we get it in `std` in C++20.
>From 7c294619f38984e26264d25524f6f5e79397f297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:45:43 -0500
Subject: [PATCH
s-perron wrote:
The test failures are unrelated to this change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Steven Perron
Date: 2025-06-30T13:31:27-04:00
New Revision: de7c2f29405ff08a91a34bc0f152cfa1cd0d9801
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de7c2f29405ff08a91a34bc0f152cfa1cd0d9801
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/de7c2f29405ff08a91a34bc0f152cfa1cd0d9801.diff
https://github.com/s-perron closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146394
We have a parsing helper function which parses either a parenthesized
expression or a parenthesized type name. This is used when parsing a unary
operator such as sizeof, for example.
The problem this solv
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman)
Changes
We have a parsing helper function which parses either a parenthesized
expression or a parenthesized type name. This is used when parsing a unary
operator such as sizeof, for example.
The problem this
AlexVlx wrote:
> Let me add my few cents here.
>
> > In the case where the target features are known during clang codegen,
> > lowering is easy: you just skip generating the bodies of the if statements
> > that don't match. If you want to some kind of "runtime" (actual runtime, or
> > SPIR-V
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/clementval approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146378
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-06-30T10:42:31-07:00
New Revision: 0494f934345f105f01f01a111c1f9f529acd26f5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0494f934345f105f01f01a111c1f9f529acd26f5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0494f934345f105f01f01a111c1f9f529acd26f5.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
High liklihood that I'll need something similar for my GPU libraries so I'd
prefer something not explicitly tied to SPIR-V.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134016
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
https://github.com/clementval approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146414
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
ActOnCXXExitDeclInitializer does three things:
- Some scope handling which isn't relevant in this context.
- Does some special handling for variables, to compute whether the variable's
initializer is manifestly constant-evaluated.
- Calls PopExpressionEvaluationContext
The
rnk wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that, as a result of this commit, the SemaTests
> target no longer exists, and to work on / run the tests that it used to
> include (such as HeuristicResolverTest.cpp), I have to build the
> ClangdUnitTests target, which requires building 1000+ test sourc
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2025-06-30T22:25:01+02:00
New Revision: f205e354ae3e002158060c830778d8c5409a9984
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f205e354ae3e002158060c830778d8c5409a9984
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f205e354ae3e002158060c830778d8c5409a9984.diff
LO
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/12328
Here is the relevant p
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146463
Both of these functions return void.
>From ad23a71d5148d200f1db8c307ca3d60d1c229a56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:15:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [CodeGen] Remove unn
https://github.com/ukalappa-mips edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -635,5 +635,66 @@ TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_bitop3_b16, "IUi",
"nc", "bitop3-insts")
TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_cvt_sr_bf16_f32, "V2yV2yfUiIb", "nc",
"f32-to-f16bf16-cvt-sr-insts")
TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_cvt_sr_f16_f32, "V2hV2hfUiIb", "nc",
"f32-to-
https://github.com/ukalappa-mips edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146466
None
>From 1480b40e0ea317111b432465493b746c10706ffc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:27:42 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Analysis] Use range-based for loops (NFC)
---
clan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146466.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Analysis/CFG.h (+3-4)
- (modified) clang/lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp (+2-3)
- (modi
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-01T12:18:16+08:00
New Revision: ce159d20e52add25e51f2aa8c504726221b204ba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce159d20e52add25e51f2aa8c504726221b204ba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce159d20e52add25e51f2aa8c504726221b204ba.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/ashwinbanwari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146461
>From 845f99834c6c9a78c05396a0337051273b1ae138 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ashwin Banwari
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 20:45:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Implement P3618R0
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r HEAD~1...HEAD libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/features.py
``
View the diff from darke
https://github.com/hnrklssn created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146468
This fixes another instance of `Assertion failed:
(NumCurrentElementsDeserializing == 0 && "should not be called while already
deserializing")`. I ran into it while importing clang modules from Swift, but I
h
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Henrik G. Olsson (hnrklssn)
Changes
This fixes another instance of `Assertion failed:
(NumCurrentElementsDeserializing == 0 && "should not be called while
already deserializing")`. I ran into it while importing clang modules from
Swift,
tclin914 wrote:
> > LLVM IR intrinsicis for vrgatherei16/vslideup/vslidedown have been
> > supported.
>
> Sorry, I found LLVM IR intrinsicis for vrgatherei16/vslideup/vslidedown
> actually haven't been supported.
LLVM IR intrinsicis for vrgatherei16/vslideup/vslidedown have been supported
no
https://github.com/sivadeilra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144745
>From 2bd3af28675d0033b92ea0b1c976aa47026b1e98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arlie Davis
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:45:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix IP2State tables
style: revert one change
Adjust tests
ad
301 - 400 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
