Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-04-30T02:17:17+03:00
New Revision: a7402b0c4ac1cc255354904ef1f46aa7b714c44f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a7402b0c4ac1cc255354904ef1f46aa7b714c44f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a7402b0c4ac1cc255354904ef1f46aa7b714c44f.
@@ -183,7 +192,7 @@ struct ModuleDeps {
///
/// This may include modules with a different context hash when it can be
/// determined that the differences are benign for this compilation.
- std::vector ClangModuleDeps;
+ std::vector ClangModuleDeps;
qion
https://github.com/DataCorrupted updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137884
>From f6166a6c2ab45edaa0ff273e2ba917fff778a243 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rong
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:24:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] change mangling API to allow calls from
swift-fr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Peter Rong (DataCorrupted)
Changes
When implementing `@objcDirect` in Swfit, Swift needs to mangle a
`Decl` that is not a clang Node.
Rewriting the ObjC's mangling logic in swift is redundant, we can just call
clang API since swift depe
@@ -277,6 +277,12 @@ constexpr bool4 isinf(double4 V) { return
isinf((float4)V); }
// lerp builtins overloads
//===--===//
+template
+constexpr __detail::enable_if_t<(N > 1 && N <= 4), vector>
-
@@ -106,3 +102,17 @@ float3 test_lerp_uint64_t3(uint64_t3 p0) { return lerp(p0,
p0, p0); }
// CHECK: %hlsl.lerp = call reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp afn <4 x float>
@llvm.[[TARGET]].lerp.v4f32(<4 x float> %{{.*}}, <4 x float> %{{.*}}, <4 x
float> %{{.*}})
// CHECK: ret <4 x floa
@@ -2602,6 +2605,100 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::foldSubToAvg(SDNode *N, const
SDLoc &DL) {
return SDValue();
}
+/// Try to fold a pointer arithmetic node.
+/// This needs to be done separately from normal addition, because pointer
+/// addition is not commutative.
+/// This fu
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137756
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jack Styles
Date: 2025-04-29T08:28:10+01:00
New Revision: ace8ceab736f7e265b206b583d218a7554bee864
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ace8ceab736f7e265b206b583d218a7554bee864
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ace8ceab736f7e265b206b583d218a7554bee864.diff
L
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137765.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp (+49)
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/builtin-functions.c
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-04-29T00:30:59-07:00
New Revision: ff66d34286b07ba864029776d097e66306cc53ef
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff66d34286b07ba864029776d097e66306cc53ef
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ff66d34286b07ba864029776d097e66306cc53ef.diff
L
https://github.com/Stylie777 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137771
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jack Styles
Date: 2025-04-29T10:32:50+01:00
New Revision: bb9fa77c8410e539d1eefdfe76c192db44bdc520
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb9fa77c8410e539d1eefdfe76c192db44bdc520
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb9fa77c8410e539d1eefdfe76c192db44bdc520.diff
L
@@ -1257,6 +1259,26 @@ inline bool isX86_64ExtendedReg(MCRegister Reg) {
return false;
}
+inline const TargetRegisterClass *
+constrainRegClassToNonRex2(const TargetRegisterClass *RC) {
fzou1 wrote:
I wrote it based on canUseApxExtendedReg function. Updated
@@ -59,19 +60,46 @@ class InProcessModuleCache : public ModuleCache {
InMemoryModuleCache InMemory;
public:
- InProcessModuleCache(ModuleCacheMutexes &Mutexes) : Mutexes(Mutexes) {}
+ InProcessModuleCache(ModuleCacheEntries &Entries) : Entries(Entries) {}
void prepare
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-04-29T10:51:24+01:00
New Revision: 4609b6a3e76e604463bab2a303c6da737f303237
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4609b6a3e76e604463bab2a303c6da737f303237
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4609b6a3e76e604463bab2a303c6da737f303237.diff
frasercrmck wrote:
I'll merge this as it's just a code move and there's no change to codegen.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
kiranchandramohan wrote:
Is enabling the flag sufficient? Is there additional work in the Frontend to
make this flag and its options useful?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137759
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
https://github.com/fangyi-zhou edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
fangyi-zhou wrote:
@steakhal
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
philnik777 wrote:
> > Can't you just run the `llvm-include-order` clang-tidy check instead?
>
> Does that take `IncludeBlocks` and `IncludeCategories` from `.clang-format`
> into account?
I don't think so, but it shouldn't be impossible to teach clang-tidy.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
@@ -1660,6 +1660,10 @@ def err_omp_expected_colon : Error<"missing ':' in %0">;
def err_omp_missing_comma : Error< "missing ',' after %0">;
def err_omp_expected_context_selector
: Error<"expected valid context selector in %0">;
+def err_omp_unknown_clause
+: Error<"expe
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `llvm` at step 5 "ninja check
1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/9322
Here is the relevant piece of
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-unknown-unknown -target-cpu tahiti -S
-verify -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-unknown-unknown -target-cpu bonaire -S
-verify -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-unknown-unknown -target-cpu carrizo -S
-verify
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-04-29T13:58:13+01:00
New Revision: 78d95cc54455755eaac43d956baed6a3612bc72c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/78d95cc54455755eaac43d956baed6a3612bc72c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/78d95cc54455755eaac43d956baed6a3612bc72c.diff
@@ -163,7 +163,10 @@ BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_b64,
"V2UiQbiiIi", "n")
BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_b96, "V3UiQbiiIi", "n")
BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_b128, "V4UiQbiiIi", "n")
+TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_lds, "vV4U
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -146,3 +146,8 @@
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION cl_khr_subgroups: enable
// expected-warning@-1{{unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_subgroups' -
ignoring}}
+#ifdef __opencl_c_generic_address_space
+#error "Incorrect __opencl_c_generic_address_space define"
ars
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137234
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage` running on `ppc64le-clang-multistage-test`
while building `llvm` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/76/builds/9147
Here is the
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137656
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hahnjo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137804
Recently commit dc17429ae6 removed some code related to template arguments in
`NestedNameSpecifier::print` that would not pass on the
`TemplateParameterList`. This would cause `printIntegral` to add type suffixe
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jonas Hahnfeld (hahnjo)
Changes
Recently commit dc17429ae6 removed some code related to template arguments in
`NestedNameSpecifier::print` that would not pass on the
`TemplateParameterList`. This would cause `printIntegral` to add type su
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Naghasan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137805
The patch introduce __builtin_spirv_generic_cast_to_ptr_explicit which is
lowered to the llvm.spv.generic.cast.to.ptr.explicit intrinsic.
The patch also introduces a new header defining its SPIR-V friendly equ
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Victor Lomuller (Naghasan)
Changes
The patch introduce __builtin_spirv_generic_cast_to_ptr_explicit which is
lowered to the llvm.spv.generic.cast.to.ptr.explicit intrinsic.
The patch also introduces a new header defining its SPIR-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Victor Lomuller (Naghasan)
Changes
The patch introduce __builtin_spirv_generic_cast_to_ptr_explicit which is
lowered to the llvm.spv.generic.cast.to.ptr.explicit intrinsic.
The patch also introduces a new header defining its SPIR-V
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Victor Lomuller (Naghasan)
Changes
The patch introduce __builtin_spirv_generic_cast_to_ptr_explicit which is
lowered to the llvm.spv.generic.cast.to.ptr.explicit intrinsic.
The patch also introduces a new header defining its SPIR-V friend
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-04-29T14:14:00+01:00
New Revision: 1e31f4b5eb96de3080810340c9083138a34587b8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1e31f4b5eb96de3080810340c9083138a34587b8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1e31f4b5eb96de3080810340c9083138a34587b8.diff
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions h,cpp,c --
clang/lib/Headers/__clang_spirv_builtins.h
clang
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-04-29T14:17:17+01:00
New Revision: 837d5a740f120eb077aa8808809c057fa38d91f3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/837d5a740f120eb077aa8808809c057fa38d91f3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/837d5a740f120eb077aa8808809c057fa38d91f3.diff
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137656
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Naghasan wrote:
Sorry I can't assign reviewers, @JonChesterfield @jhuber6 as you are involved
in gpuintrin.h, I'd welcome feedbacks here (feel free to ping other relevant
persons)
For the SPIR-V side of thing @VyacheslavLevytskyy @farzonl I appreciate your
feedbacks as well :)
FYI @tahoner
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions h,cl,inc --
libclc/clc/lib/generic/math/clc_fract.cl
libclc
https://github.com/fzou1 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136660
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frasercrmck updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137785
>From f9a265e0d9bcecb80d25b97c394d7b9aa68d27ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Cormack
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:43:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libclc] Move fract to the CLC library
The builtin was
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ml-opt-rel-x86-64` running
on `ml-opt-rel-x86-64-b2` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/185/builds/17441
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ml-opt-devrel-x86-64`
running on `ml-opt-devrel-x86-64-b2` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/175/builds/17658
Here i
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ml-opt-dev-x86-64` running
on `ml-opt-dev-x86-64-b1` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/137/builds/17687
Here is the
https://github.com/Naghasan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137805
>From 90725e8f74295bfd9169e03e73af54c2cf4616ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Lomuller
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:20:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][SPIRV] Add builtin for OpGenericCastToPtrExplicit and
arsenm wrote:
> I don't suppose the recent
> [clarifications](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/363b05944f92) to
> `llvm.minnum` and `llvm.maxnum` change anything here?
It depends on whether the conformance test is fixed to match the fuzzy language
of the spec or not. If the decisio
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137785
The builtin was already vectorized so there's no difference to codegen for
non-SPIR-V targets.
>From f9a265e0d9bcecb80d25b97c394d7b9aa68d27ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Cormack
Date: Tue, 29 Apr
AaronBallman wrote:
> > > > @zahiraam @AaronBallman a different option would be to add a signed vs
> > > > unsigned storage option to the `OPTION` and `BENIGN_ENUM_LANGOPT`
> > > > macros so we can store negative enumerations safely
> > >
> > >
> > > I think I would prefer this solution. We n
https://github.com/ShashwathiNavada updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125643
>From 0aebcd7119fbcd51154c5d9706752e8ff3f041bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ShashwathiNavada
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 00:16:09 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Adding diagnostics for unsupported option
---
paulwalker-arm wrote:
> @paulwalker-arm the reasoning behind creating separate records, is that
> mfloat type is not available for aarch32 architectures and therefore all
> intrinsics using it need to be gated behind `ArchGuard =
> "defined(__aarch64__)"` .
I see. How practical would it be f
https://github.com/ShashwathiNavada edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125643
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ShashwathiNavada updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125643
>From 0aebcd7119fbcd51154c5d9706752e8ff3f041bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ShashwathiNavada
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 00:16:09 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Adding diagnostics for unsupported option
---
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-test-suite` running on `ppc64le-clang-test-suite` while
building `llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/95/builds/1260
https://github.com/ShashwathiNavada updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125643
>From 0aebcd7119fbcd51154c5d9706752e8ff3f041bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ShashwathiNavada
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 00:16:09 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] Adding diagnostics for unsupported option
---
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/24594
Here is the rele
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-debian-cpp20`
running on `clang-debian-cpp20` while building `llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/108/builds/12234
Here is the r
https://github.com/s-perron closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137378
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
fzou1 wrote:
Sorry. The test failure had been fixed in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137794.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136660
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
Author: Steven Perron
Date: 2025-04-29T09:28:29-04:00
New Revision: cc0cf7253967af4aa3dce2a5de186f766564747b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cc0cf7253967af4aa3dce2a5de186f766564747b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cc0cf7253967af4aa3dce2a5de186f766564747b.diff
https://github.com/vgvassilev approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-printf-runtime-binding",
AMDGPUPrintfRuntimeBindingPass())
MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-remove-incompatible-functions",
AMDGPURemoveIncompatibleFunctionsPass(*this))
MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-sw-lower-lds", AMDGPUSwLowerLDSPass(*this))
MODULE_PASS("amdg
Author: Reid Kleckner
Date: 2025-04-29T06:32:03-07:00
New Revision: db2315afa8db1153e3b85d452cd14d5a1b957350
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db2315afa8db1153e3b85d452cd14d5a1b957350
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db2315afa8db1153e3b85d452cd14d5a1b957350.diff
@@ -23,4 +23,20 @@
#define _CLC_DEF __attribute__((always_inline))
#endif
+#if __OPENCL_C_VERSION__ == CL_VERSION_2_0 ||
\
+(__OPENCL_C_VERSION__ >= CL_VERSION_3_0 &&
\
+ defined(__opencl_c_generic_addr
https://github.com/rnk closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134196
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -35,8 +35,10 @@ static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfos[] = {
static_assert(std::size(BuiltinInfos) == NumBuiltins);
llvm::SmallVector
-SPIRVTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() const {
- return {{&BuiltinStrings, BuiltinInfos}};
+BaseSPIRTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() con
@@ -35,8 +35,10 @@ static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfos[] = {
static_assert(std::size(BuiltinInfos) == NumBuiltins);
llvm::SmallVector
-SPIRVTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() const {
- return {{&BuiltinStrings, BuiltinInfos}};
+BaseSPIRTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() con
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2025-04-29T07:06:08-04:00
New Revision: df267d77f6cc06608d2fabc2139cabbd99007381
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df267d77f6cc06608d2fabc2139cabbd99007381
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df267d77f6cc06608d2fabc2139cabbd99007381.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137658
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137368
>From e8234c9f374783f3b3fde586464037f52eda2f77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:16:39 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [C] Diagnose declarations hidden in C++
This introduce
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-unknown-unknown -target-cpu tahiti -S
-verify -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-unknown-unknown -target-cpu bonaire -S
-verify -o - %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple amdgcn-unknown-unknown -target-cpu carrizo -S
-verify
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-nvptx-nvidia-win`
running on `as-builder-8` while building `llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/54/builds/8678
Here is the relev
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137234
>From 56a3f3cd282e9bd5ef9014e4125380e0d9685121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:17:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [C] Diagnose use of C++ keywords in C
This adds a ne
DaanDeMeyer wrote:
> Can't you just run the `llvm-include-order` clang-tidy check instead?
Does that take `IncludeBlocks` and `IncludeCategories` from `.clang-format`
into account?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137617
___
cfe-commits mail
arsenm wrote:
In practice this should be a single use of an internal function and should not
require this hint. Is this papering over a different issue?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.l
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`llvm` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/15286
Here is the relevant pie
@@ -6107,6 +6109,44 @@ static bool isFromSystemHeader(SourceManager &SM, const
Decl *D) {
SM.isInSystemMacro(D->getLocation());
}
+constexpr unsigned countCPlusPlusKeywords() {
+ unsigned Ret = 0;
+#define MODULES_KEYWORD(NAME)
+#define KEYWORD(NAME, FLAGS) ++Ret;
+
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `llvm` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/16860
Here is the relevant piece of the b
hahnjo wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, -fincremental-extensions should set the language
> > option IncrementalExtensions which in turn is the default for
> > Preprocessor::IncrementalProcessing.
>
> It is true that it is the default, but it's possible for clients to have one
> without the ot
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2025-04-29T07:58:00-04:00
New Revision: 2f976956e5ccef566418853015fb6b31257aa69f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f976956e5ccef566418853015fb6b31257aa69f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f976956e5ccef566418853015fb6b31257aa69f.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137368
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-nvptx64-nvidia-win`
running on `as-builder-8` while building `llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/155/builds/8781
Here is the re
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137234
>From 56a3f3cd282e9bd5ef9014e4125380e0d9685121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:17:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [C] Diagnose use of C++ keywords in C
This adds a ne
https://github.com/Naghasan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137805
>From 020a804188b13ef881dcf1cbd81a5e11e4803d62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Lomuller
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:20:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][SPIRV] Add builtin for OpGenericCastToPtrExplicit and
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137811
This commit moves the fdim builtin to the CLC library. It simultaneously
simplifies the codegen, unifying it between scalar and vector and avoiding
bithacking for vector types.
>From a20d00150430c7e5c24b69
https://github.com/paulwalker-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130973
>From 32a2805a41dc3ff02bff9df26f4665923445b488 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Walker
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:58:51 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add SROA tests for casts between fixed and scalable
ty
@@ -35,8 +35,10 @@ static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfos[] = {
static_assert(std::size(BuiltinInfos) == NumBuiltins);
llvm::SmallVector
-SPIRVTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() const {
- return {{&BuiltinStrings, BuiltinInfos}};
+BaseSPIRTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() con
@@ -35,8 +35,10 @@ static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfos[] = {
static_assert(std::size(BuiltinInfos) == NumBuiltins);
llvm::SmallVector
-SPIRVTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() const {
- return {{&BuiltinStrings, BuiltinInfos}};
+BaseSPIRTargetInfo::getTargetBuiltins() con
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5837,12 +5838,13 @@ static void handleBuiltinAliasAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL) {
bool IsAArch64 = S.Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isAArch64();
bool IsARM = S.Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isARM();
bool IsRISCV = S.Context.getTargetInfo().g
101 - 200 of 510 matches
Mail list logo
