hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:
Passing `-integrated-as` does not help because it is used on AIX to control
whether object files are generated directly or not (for C/C++ source).
> Or should we just outright disable the test on AIX (and perhaps other
> affected platforms)?
XFAIL would be good.
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136729
>From 748a7f76bf0188e0a1b72fcd5527a03a5ca2f054 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:05:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] Change build of OpenMP device runtime to be a
separate
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136488
>From e87536be32965114f1ead1b562cfba289d3f32c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:03:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [CIR] Upstream initial support for fixed size VectorType
@@ -637,6 +637,42 @@ ArrayType::getABIAlignment(const ::mlir::DataLayout
&dataLayout,
return dataLayout.getTypeABIAlignment(getEltType());
}
+//===--===//
+// VectorType Definitions
+//===--
@@ -1310,6 +1310,70 @@ def GetGlobalOp : CIR_Op<"get_global",
let hasVerifier = 0;
}
+//===--===//
+// GetMemberOp
+//===--===//
+
+def Get
bcardosolopes wrote:
> I think we should just make them illegal.
sounds good to me
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/andykaylor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136383
>From 5f83632c07d59df162d79e73d361bea1aa64e117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kaylor
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:02:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [CIR] Upstream support for accessing structure members
Thi
samitolvanen wrote:
Unfortunately, the `__kcfi_typeid_` values are intentionally zero-extended, so
they can be used in relocations with `movl`. With your patch applied:
```
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
ld.lld: error: vmlinux.o:(function __cfi___memcpy: .noinstr.text+0x4ac1):
relocation R_X86_64_
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135691
>From 949ec2a683faf53652b21a4c90206befa498bf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Drake
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:37:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] [Driver] add a Cygwin ToolChain
Add a new Cygwin
Author: Mythreya
Date: 2025-04-23T02:36:48-04:00
New Revision: 665914fea1433409015a87fef2837218bcd21460
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/665914fea1433409015a87fef2837218bcd21460
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/665914fea1433409015a87fef2837218bcd21460.diff
LOG:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/16478
Here is the relevant piece o
https://github.com/HighCommander4 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136106
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: jeremyd2019
Date: 2025-04-23T09:48:08+03:00
New Revision: ca3a5d37ef64668234cbce7236dd640a98e2d687
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ca3a5d37ef64668234cbce7236dd640a98e2d687
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ca3a5d37ef64668234cbce7236dd640a98e2d687.diff
L
https://github.com/HighCommander4 approved this pull request.
Looks good, thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136106
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135691
>From 949ec2a683faf53652b21a4c90206befa498bf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Drake
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:37:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] [Driver] add a Cygwin ToolChain
Add a new Cygwin
https://github.com/mstorsjo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135701
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/andykaylor approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136741
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mstorsjo commented:
What test coverage do we have for targeting cygwin with clang right now? Do we
have enough tests to make sure that this is a refactoring, so things work
mostly like before, but with better structured code? If not, we should probably
add some sort of minim
@@ -180,35 +170,14 @@ bool InitHeaderSearch::AddUnmappedPath(const Twine &Path,
IncludeDirGroup Group,
return false;
}
-void InitHeaderSearch::AddMinGWCPlusPlusIncludePaths(StringRef Base,
- StringRef Arch,
-
mstorsjo wrote:
Adding @MaskRay as the Clang Driver maintainer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135691
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mstorsjo edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135691
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6331,26 +6321,79 @@ static StringLiteralCheckType checkFormatStringExpr(
}
}
-return SLCT_NotALiteral;
+// try to constant-evaluate the string
+break;
}
default:
+// try to constant-evaluate the string
+break;
+ }
+
+ const StringLit
https://github.com/modiking edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135444
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mstorsjo wrote:
Oh, also, what's the tradeoff between having this extend the `Generic_GCC`
driver, vs doing a plain from-scratch implementation that extents the
`ToolChain` base class like the `MinGW` driver does? I guess that it's a
smaller step to just tweak `Generic_GCC`, not requiring all
@@ -7230,7 +7230,9 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
// -fuse-cxa-atexit is default.
if (!Args.hasFlag(
options::OPT_fuse_cxa_atexit, options::OPT_fno_use_cxa_atexit,
- !RawTriple.isOSAIX() && !RawTriple.isOSWindows() &&
+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: None (modiking)
Changes
Adds support for new Shared Cluster Memory Address Space (SHARED_CLUSTER,
addrspace 7). See
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#distributed-shared-memory
for details.
Follow-up to http
https://github.com/mstorsjo approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135701
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -180,35 +170,14 @@ bool InitHeaderSearch::AddUnmappedPath(const Twine &Path,
IncludeDirGroup Group,
return false;
}
-void InitHeaderSearch::AddMinGWCPlusPlusIncludePaths(StringRef Base,
- StringRef Arch,
-
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135691
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahatanak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136771
Handle the case where the base expression is a pointer to a vector type.
rdar://149223362
>From c8df1a51efd6349c5905b337059d597d3c1d7146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12
https://github.com/modiking edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135444
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Akira Hatanaka (ahatanak)
Changes
Handle the case where the base expression is a pointer to a vector type.
rdar://149223362
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136771.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/A
https://github.com/modiking edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135444
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ahatanak wrote:
clang crashes compiling the following code.
```
typedef float float4 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(4)));
constexpr float4 v{1,2,3,4};
constexpr const float4 *p = &v;
constexpr float f = p->x;
```
I created a PR that fixes the crash:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (modiking)
Changes
Adds support for new Shared Cluster Memory Address Space (SHARED_CLUSTER,
addrspace 7). See
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#distributed-shared-memory
for details.
Follow-up to htt
jeremyd2019 wrote:
To me, the general theory is that Cygwin is more UNIXy than Windowsy, so I
based this off of actually the Hurd.h/cpp (as it had pretty limited amounts of
special cases).
It looks to me like the #74933 PR followed the from-scratch ToolChain idea, and
that probably accounts f
erichkeane wrote:
> > Also, we have `getIfCondMutable` in a number of places as well, which is
> > now inconsistent with skipping the 'operand'.
>
> I am not sure I follow - are you saying that for consistency, you think that
> the word 'operand' should be included in the name of `ifCond` (or
vsapsai wrote:
> > What would happen if both A-1.pcm and A-2.pcm are built for the same files
> > (e.g., from Sysroot) but have different file names? Not saying it is a
> > valid use case to support, just curious what would happen.
>
> I tried this, where basically `A-1.pcm` is built again but
@@ -9197,7 +9197,10 @@ bool LValueExprEvaluator::VisitExtVectorElementExpr(
if (Success) {
Result.setFrom(Info.Ctx, Val);
-const auto *VT = E->getBase()->getType()->castAs();
+QualType BaseType = E->getBase()->getType();
+if (E->isArrow())
er
https://github.com/t-rasmud approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136170
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vsapsai wrote:
Does the described test case look like a build system problem? In my
understanding at step 4 we should have re-scanned B to know that we need some
B'.pcm depending on A-2.pcm. Regardless of the answer I don't want to block the
change as it is still an improvement. Just thinking
https://github.com/raoanag updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136026
>From 3221715ed9c06f6ef05414ae79a6e3bc576d4ba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anagha Rajendra Rao
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:47:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Refract implementation
---
clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/bu
jeremyd2019 wrote:
> > I don't have experience with llvm's test suite though, but if it's just a
> > matter of adding additional cases to existing tests or maybe copying some
> > existing tests I might be OK figuring it out.
>
> Yeah it's usually not that hard to figure out. A couple general p
Author: modiking
Date: 2025-04-22T16:50:45-07:00
New Revision: 3d04da5bc022269b3238b2a84347dce7a7afd51b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d04da5bc022269b3238b2a84347dce7a7afd51b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d04da5bc022269b3238b2a84347dce7a7afd51b.diff
LOG:
hnrklssn wrote:
Right, yeah. Thanks for working on this! We have quite a few diagnostics for
bounds safety to help guide users, so good diagnostics are important to us.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134769
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
https://github.com/modiking closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136768
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rjmccall wrote:
That's fine with me, yeah.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136038
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clangd-ubuntu-tsan`
running on `clangd-ubuntu-clang` while building `clang,llvm,mlir` at step 6
"test-build-clangd-clangd-index-server-clangd-in...".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/134
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-runtime-cuda-clang`
running on `as-builder-7` while building `clang,llvm,mlir` at step 7
"build-flang-default".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/7/builds/13803
Here is the releva
https://github.com/s-perron updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127675
>From 2a288bc3528ae63f05551492518cbf500689108d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Perron
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:45:32 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [HLSL] Use hlsl_device address space for getpointer.
We ad
ilya-biryukov wrote:
@kadircet let's team up tomorrow and poke at what's happening with the smaller
reproducer to figure out if this is the right fix?
@AaronBallman I was initially concerned that it would be incorrect to consider
the compound literal expression a full expression even if it fix
https://github.com/shafik created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136728
Static analysis flagged this use after move. It is undefined behavior and I
don't see any possible performance gains here to attempt to do anything else
but simply remove it.
>From 693a1f38d9a28ef515ccb738bee62
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Shafik Yaghmour (shafik)
Changes
Static analysis flagged this use after move. It is undefined behavior and I
don't see any possible performance gains here to attempt to do anything else
but simply remove it.
---
Full diff: https://github
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2025-04-22T10:06:28-07:00
New Revision: c05da6e8611e4da7b16729cc2b8d2dc6c77ba4be
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c05da6e8611e4da7b16729cc2b8d2dc6c77ba4be
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c05da6e8611e4da7b16729cc2b8d2dc6c77ba4be.diff
LO
https://github.com/jhuber6 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136729
Summary:
Currently we build the OpenMP device runtime as part of the `offload/`
project. This is problematic because it has several restrictions when
compared to the normal offloading runtime. It can only be buil
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136728
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
> @kadircet let's team up tomorrow and poke at what's happening with the
> smaller reproducer to figure out if this is the right fix?
>
> @AaronBallman I was initially concerned that it would be incorrect to
> consider the compound literal expression a full expression even
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136729
>From ee6ca9501a07746c446a106619567d3faff07e98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:05:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] Change build of OpenMP device runtime to be a
separate
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
Currently we build the OpenMP device runtime as part of the `offload/`
project. This is problematic because it has several restrictions when
compared to the normal offloading runtime. It can on
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
Currently we build the OpenMP device runtime as part of the `offload/`
project. This is problematic because it has several restrictions when
compared to the normal offloading runtime. It can only be b
jeremyd2019 wrote:
I tried to exercise both the -msys and -cygwin directory structures in these
tests - I alternated between i686 and x86_64 in the normal and cross basic
trees.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135691
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135691
>From 949ec2a683faf53652b21a4c90206befa498bf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Drake
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:37:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] [Driver] add a Cygwin ToolChain
Add a new Cygwin
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-04-23T14:16:23+08:00
New Revision: 832ca744f2f25a7a5334f2f04380c84e41f71678
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/832ca744f2f25a7a5334f2f04380c84e41f71678
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/832ca744f2f25a7a5334f2f04380c84e41f71678.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/tclin914 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp,c,h --
clang/lib/Headers/arm_acle.h
clang/test/CodeGen/
https://github.com/ilovepi commented:
For the new test files, is it possible to precommit them? I think it will be
easier to review the delta.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jofrn updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123609
>From 210b6d80bcfbbcd216f98199df386280724561e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jofernau
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 04:51:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [TargetVerifier][AMDGPU] Add TargetVerifier.
This pass verifies
modiking wrote:
Thanks for the thorough review! I'm splitting this so that this change only
contains the addrspace + new instructions/intrinsics and the follow-up PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136768 is updating the existing
intrinsics.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135701
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Félix?= Cloutier ,
=?utf-8?q?Félix?= Cloutier
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/apple-fcloutier updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135864
>From 7e15ec24e6de96b9828f13f21099446e55831591 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?F=C3=A9lix=20Cloutier?=
Date: T
https://github.com/modiking edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136768
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -116,6 +117,13 @@ CXStringSet *createSet(const std::vector
&Strings) {
return Set;
}
+CXStringSet *createSet(const std::vector &Strings) {
+ return createSetImpl(Strings);
+}
+
+CXStringSet *createSet(const std::vector &Strings) {
+ return createSetImpl(Strings);
-
jeremyd2019 wrote:
> I see that that patch also contains some similar cleanups to
> InitHeaderSearch.cpp - do these patches share some common ancestry (e.g. some
> cygwin specific clang patchsets that have been floating around somewhere?).
No, I wasn't aware of that PR, I noticed that using Ge
https://github.com/V-FEXrt approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: modiking
Date: 2025-04-22T15:14:39-07:00
New Revision: d6a68be7af0e1cec95e5fb9442dc1867cbde9f8d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6a68be7af0e1cec95e5fb9442dc1867cbde9f8d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6a68be7af0e1cec95e5fb9442dc1867cbde9f8d.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/modiking closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135444
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp --
clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
``
https://github.com/guy-david edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/guy-david created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136792
Note: the patch is probably amending the wrong piece of code, I've tried to add
it to `buildThisParam` but hit an assertion because of a missing translation
unit context.
Clang, unlike GCC, does not transfor
https://github.com/guy-david edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/guy-david edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/guy-david edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 requested changes to this pull request.
exclude std::array don't resolve problem here. It can also happen in user
defined class.
e.g. https://godbolt.org/z/cn46MT5Mn
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
___
c
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136571
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136612
>From 046b60179ee5eddc6db2193406bfc2ef10fda3df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:20:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][Modules] Report when` lookupModuleFile` fails and
https://github.com/fanju110 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136098
>From 9494c9752400e4708dbc8b6a5ca4993ea9565e95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: fanyikang
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:17:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add support for IR PGO
(-fprofile-generate/-fprofile-use=/file
@@ -625,3 +625,33 @@ def RP2350_HAZARD3 : RISCVProcessorModel<"rp2350-hazard3",
FeatureStdExtZbkb,
FeatureStdExtZcb,
FeatureStdExtZcmp]>;
+
+def ANDES_N
@@ -625,3 +625,33 @@ def RP2350_HAZARD3 : RISCVProcessorModel<"rp2350-hazard3",
FeatureStdExtZbkb,
FeatureStdExtZcb,
FeatureStdExtZcmp]>;
+
+def ANDES_N
@@ -209,3 +209,18 @@ struct S15{
S15(S14& d):d{d}{}
S14& d;
};
+
+//Issue #133715
+namespace std {
HerrCai0907 wrote:
clang-tidy@main will also not give warning for this code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
__
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DeinAlptraum wrote:
@AaronBallman ping/reminder for a review 🙇
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tclin914 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136670
>From df3a0b2bd9cb31fc8e252e250d3107dd1ac2cc0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Lin
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:12:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Add Andes N45/NX45 processor definition
Andes N45/NX45 a
@@ -477,21 +476,21 @@ When the ``-fmodules-embed-all-files`` flag are enabled,
Clang explicitly emits
code into the BMI file, the contents of the BMI file contain a sufficiently
verbose
representation to reproduce the original source file.
-:sup:`1`` Input files: The source
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136719
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
I am not a native speaker. So LGTM generally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136719
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gulfemsavrun wrote:
We started seeing the following failure, and I bisected it to this commit.
```
[1343/43547](319) CXX
host_x64/obj/third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/libprotobuf_lite.generated_message_tctable_lite.cc.o
FAILED: [code=1]
host_x64/obj/third_party/protobuf/src/google/proto
201 - 300 of 379 matches
Mail list logo
